Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant  x

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  o

 

Check the appropriate box:

o

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

 

GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

 

 

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

 

 

(5)

Total fee paid:

 

 

 

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

 

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

 

 

(3)

Filing Party:

 

 

 

 

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

 

April 24, 201526, 2018

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are invited to attend the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Genesis Healthcare, Inc., to be held on June 3, 2015,6, 2018, at 9:008:30 a.m. local time, at our office located at 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348.

 

At this year’s annual meeting you will be asked to:

 

1.              Elect three Class I directors to serve for a three-year term;terms expiring at our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal;

2.              Vote on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in thisthe attached proxy statement;

3.              Vote to approve the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan;

4.Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015;2018; and

5.4.              Transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting, including any continuation, postponement or adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

The accompanying Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement describe these matters. We urge you to read this information carefully. The Boardboard of Directorsdirectors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the three nominees for director in Proposal 1 and “FOR” the approval of each of Proposals 2 3 and 4.3. In addition to the business to be transacted as described above, management will speak about the company and respond to questions from stockholders.

 

We are pleased to take advantage of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Availability Notice”) instead of a paper copy of this proxy statement and our 20142017 Annual Report to Stockholders. The Internet Availability Notice contains instructions on how to access those documents over the Internet. The Internet Availability Notice also contains instructions on how to request a paper copy of our proxy materials, including this proxy statement, our 20142017 Annual Report to Stockholders and a form of proxy card or voting instruction card, as applicable. All stockholders who do not receive an Internet Availability Notice will receive a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail. This process provides a variety of benefits, including enabling us to reduce the costs and environmental impact of our annual meeting.

 

It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the annual meeting whether or not you plan to attend in person. If you are viewing the proxy statement on the Internet, you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet by following the instructions on the Internet Availability Notice and the instructions listed on the Internet site.  If you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, you may vote by completing and mailing the proxy card enclosed with the proxy statement, or you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card.  If your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should review the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials used by that firm to determine whether and how you will be able to submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet.  Submitting a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

 

Michael S. Sherman

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel,

 

Secretary and Assistant Treasurer

 



Table of Contents

 

 

Genesis Healthcare, Inc.

101 East State Street

Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 3, 20156, 2018

 

To the Stockholders of Genesis Healthcare, Inc.:

 

We will hold our 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders at our office located at 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348, on June 3, 2015,6, 2018, at 9:008:30 a.m. local time, to:

 

1.              Elect three Class I directors to serve for three-year terms expiring at our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal;

2.              Vote on an advisory basis to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in the attached proxy statement;

3.              Vote to approve the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan;

4.Ratify the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015;2018; and

5.4.              Transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting, including any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof.

 

These items of business are described in the attached proxy statement. Only our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 8, 2015,9, 2018, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any continuation, postponement or adjournment of the annual meeting. A list of stockholders eligible to vote at our annual meeting will be available for inspection at the annual meeting, and at our executive offices during regular business hours for a period of no less than ten days prior to the annual meeting.

 

Your vote is important.  In accordance with rules and regulations adopted by the SEC, we have elected to furnish our proxy materials to stockholders by providing access to the materials on the Internet. Accordingly, a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Internet Availability Notice”) has been mailed to the majority of our stockholders, while other stockholders have instead received paper copies of the documents accessible on the Internet.  It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person.  If you are the registered holder of your shares and are viewing the proxy statement on the Internet, you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet by following the instructions on the Internet Availability Notice previously mailed to you and the instructions listed on the Internet site.  If you are receiving a paper copy of the proxy statement, you may vote by completing and mailing the proxy card enclosed with the proxy statement, or you may grant your proxy electronically via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card.  If your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, you should reviewfollow the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials usedinstructions provided to you by that firm to determine whether and how you will be able to submit your proxy by telephone or over the Internet.proxy.  Submitting a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing a proxy card will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

 

Michael S. Sherman

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel,

 

Secretary and Assistant Treasurer

 



Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

Page

INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION

1

General

1

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on June 3, 20156, 2018

1

Stockholders Entitled to Vote

12

Voting

12

Revoking Your Proxy; Changing Your Vote

2

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

23

Quorum and Votes Required

3

Solicitation of Proxies

34

Assistance

4

Additional Information Regarding the Internet Availability of Our Proxy Materials

4

Forward-Looking Statements

4

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

5

Board Structure

5

Board Nominees

5

Composition of the Board of Directors

5

Director Biographical Information

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

109

Board Leadership Structure

109

Board Independence

109

Board Meetings

1110

Committees of the Board of Directors

1110

Risk Oversight

1412

Communication with the Board of Directors

1413

Code of Conduct

15

13

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

1614

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

1815

Equity Compensation Plan Information

1816

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

1917

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

2018

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2018

Compensation Committee Report

3226

Summary Compensation Table

3226

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

3327

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

3428

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

3528

Employment Agreements

3629

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

3829

CEO Pay Ratio

31

Director Compensation

4131

Director Compensation Table

4232

Compensation Risk Assessment

4332

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

44

i



Table of Contents

AUDIT MATTERS

45

Audit Committee Report

45

33

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

4634

i



Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

35

PROPOSAL 3:  APPROVAL OF THE GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. 2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

47

Board Recommendation

47

Equity Compensation Plan Information

47

Historical Annual Share Usage

48

Description of the 2015 Plan

49

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

53

New Plan Benefits

54

PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

5536

Board Recommendation

5536

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

55

36

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

5737

Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions

5737

Related Person Transactions

57

37

OTHER MATTERS

6140

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

6140

Householding of Proxy Materials

6241

Incorporation by Reference

62

Exhibit A: GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. 2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

A-142

 

*****

 

ii



Table of Contents

Genesis Healthcare, Inc.

101 East State Street

Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 


 

INFORMATION CONCERNING VOTING AND SOLICITATION

 

General

 

The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the board of directors of Genesis Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for use at our 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on Wednesday, June 3, 2015,6, 2018, at 9:008:30 a.m. local time, or at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof, for the purposes discussed in this proxy statement and any business properly brought before the annual meeting. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the annual meeting. In this proxy statement, the “company,” “Skilled Healthcare,” “Genesis Healthcare,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean Genesis Healthcare, Inc., unless otherwise indicated.  On February 2, 2015, Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. completed its combination (the “Combination”) with FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC (“FC-GEN”), and changed its name to Genesis Healthcare, Inc.  The Combination was effected pursuant to the terms of a Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2014 and amended as of January 5, 2015 (as so amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), by and between Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and FC-GEN.  The Combination, the Purchase Agreement and certain related matters were described in an Information Statement on Schedule 14C that was filed with the SEC on January 9, 2015, and provided to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. stockholders of record as of January 8, 2015.

 

All stockholders of record as of April 8, 2015,9, 2018, are entitled to notice of and to vote at our 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The annual meeting will be held at our office located at 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348.  We intend to mailbegin mailing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or (“Internet Availability Notice,Notice”), to certain of our stockholders, and, alternatively, a paper copy of this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card to all other stockholders, on or about April 24, 2015.27, 2018.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Bebe Held on June 3, 20156, 2018

 

We are pleased to take advantage of SEC rules that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we sent to the majority of our stockholders the Internet Availability Notice regarding Internet availability of the proxy materials for this year’s annual meeting. Other stockholders were instead sent paper copies of the proxy materials accessible on the Internet. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy can be found in the Internet Availability Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” In that case, either the Internet Availability Notice or the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders have been sent directly to you.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” In such case, either a notice similar to the Internet Availability Notice or the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders should have been provided (or otherwise made available) to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record on how to vote your shares by following such intermediary’s instructions for voting.

TheIn addition, please also note that the notice of the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this proxy statement, a proxy card sample and our 20142017 Annual Report to Stockholders are available on the investor relations section of our website at www.genesishcc.comYou are encouragedWe encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting.

Stockholders Entitled to Vote

 

Stockholders of record as of the close of business on April 8, 2015,9, 2018, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the annual meeting. On all matters to be voted upon at the annual meeting, each holder of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock is entitled to one vote for each share of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common stock, respectively, held of record by such holder. You may vote your shares at the annual meeting by attending and voting in person, by voting via the Internet or telephone as described herein, or by having your shares represented at the annual meeting by a valid proxy.

 

Voting

 

You may vote by ballot in person at the annual meeting. Alternatively, if your shares are registered directly in your name, you may submit a proxy and vote by using any of the following methods:

 

·                  By Telephone:  You may use any touch-tone telephone to vote at any time until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the day before the meeting, by calling 1-800-690-6903 and following the voice-guided instructions.

·                  By Internet:  You may use the Internet to vote at any time until 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Time) on the day before the meeting, by going to www.proxyvote.com. To vote on the Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions for Internet voting shown on your proxy card or Internet Availability Notice.

·                  By Mail:  If you received a printed proxy card, you may vote by completing, signing and dating the proxy card and returning it in its accompanying postage-paid envelope to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

1



Table of Contents

To determine how you may revoke or change your vote submitted via telephone, Internet or mail as described above, please refer to the section below entitled “Revoking Your Proxy; Changing Your Vote.”

 

If your shares are not registered directly in your name (e.g., you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other holder of record), you may vote by following the instructions detailed on the notice or voting instruction form you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee.

 

Your vote is very important. Accordingly, whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, you should vote by using one of the methods described above.

 

All properly signed proxies that are received before the polls are closed at the annual meeting and that are not revoked will be voted at the annual meeting according to the instructions indicated on the proxies or, if no instructions are indicated with respect to a particular proposal, they will be voted as follows: (i) “FOR” the election of each of the three nominees for director as described in Proposal 1; (ii) “FOR” the advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in Proposal 2; (iii) “FOR” the approval of the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan as described in Proposal 3; and (iv)(iii) “FOR” the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm as described in Proposal 4.3.

 

The enclosed proxy gives Thomas DiVittorio, our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary, and Michael S. Sherman, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel Secretary and Assistant Treasurer,Secretary, or either of them, discretionary authority to vote your shares with respect to all additional matters that might come before the annual meeting, including any motion made for continuance, adjournment or postponement of the annual meeting (including for purposes of soliciting additional votes).

 

Revoking Your Proxy; Changing Your Vote

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting by taking any of the following actions:

 

·                  delivering to our Corporate Secretary a signed written notice of revocation, bearing a date later than the date of the proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked;

 

·                  properly delivering a subsequent proxy in one of the manners authorized and described in this proxy statement (such as by mail, via the Internet or by telephone), relating to the same shares and bearing a later date than the original proxy; or

 

·                  attending the annual meeting and voting in person, although attendance at the annual meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

 

Written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to the revocation of proxies (other than delivering a subsequent proxy) should be addressed to:

Genesis Healthcare, Inc.

Attn: Michael S. Sherman, Secretary

101 East State Street

Kennett Square, PA 19348

 

If your shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to do so.

 

Attendance at the Annual Meeting

 

All stockholders who choose to attend the annual meeting in person will need to present a valid government-issued photo identification (e.g., a driver’s license, state identification card or passport) at the door to be admitted to the annual meeting. Additionally, if you hold your shares in a stock brokerage account or in the name of a bank or other holder of record and you plan to attend the annual meeting, you will also need to obtain and present a copy of your brokerage account statement (which you can obtain from your broker) reflecting your ownership of our common stock as of the close of business on April 8, 2015,9, 2018, the record date for the annual meeting.

 

2



Table of Contents

Quorum and Votes Required

 

At the close of business on April 8, 2015,9, 2018, there were 73,587,66599,001,650 shares of our Class A common stock, 15,511,603744,396 shares of our Class B common stock and 64,449,38059,700,801 shares of our Class C common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.  Stockholders of record are entitled to one (1) vote, on each proposal, for each share of Class A common stock, Class B common stock and Class C common held by the stockholder. Thus, a total of 153,548,648159,446,847 votes may be cast on each proposal at the annual meeting. All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of elections appointed for the annual meeting. Michael S. Sherman, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer, and Michael T. Berg, our Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, havehas been appointed to serve as inspectorsinspector of election at the annual meeting.

 

The inspector of elections will determine whether a quorum is present at the annual meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of stockholders entitled to cast at least a majority of the votes that all stockholders are entitled to cast at the annual meeting will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Shares of common stock held by persons attending the annual meeting but not voting, shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as to a particular proposal and broker “non-votes” will be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast. Brokers, banks or other nominees who hold shares of common stock in “street name” for beneficial owners of those shares typically have the authority to vote in their discretion on “routine” proposals when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. However, brokers are not allowed to exercise their voting discretion with respect to the approval of matters that Thethe New York Stock Exchange or the NYSE,(the “NYSE”), determines to be “non-routine,” without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. These non-voted shares are referred to as “broker non-votes.” If your broker, bank or nominee holds your common stock in “street name,” your broker, bank or nominee is entitled to vote your shares on “non-routine” proposals only if you provide instructions on how to vote by filling out the voting instruction form sent to you by your broker, bank or nominee with this proxy statement. Proposals 1 2 and 32 are considered “non-routine” matters on which brokers, banks and other nominees may vote only with specific instructions from beneficial owners. The inspector of elections will determine whether a quorum is present.

 

For Proposal 1, directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. Thus, the three nominees receiving the greatest number of votes will be elected, assuming there is a quorum present at the annual meeting. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD ALL” or “FOR ALL EXCEPT,” as the case may be, with respect to the election of the director will not be counted in the number of votes cast on a matter, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Your broker is not entitled to vote on the election of directors without your instruction. As a result, abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted in determining which nominees received the largest number of votes cast.

 

Proposal 2, approval on an advisory basis of the resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes that all stockholders present in person or represented by proxy are entitled to cast at the annual meeting. Therefore, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Thus, broker non-votes will be deemed shares not entitled to vote on the proposal, will not be counted as votes for or against the proposal, and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of the proposal.

 

Proposal 3, approvalthe ratification of the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan,selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes that all stockholders present in person or represented by proxy are entitled to cast at the annual meeting. Therefore, abstentions will have the same effect as votes against the proposal. Brokers do not have discretionary authority to vote on this proposal. Thus, broker non-votes will be deemed shares not entitled to vote on the proposal, will not be counted as votes for or against the proposal, and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of the proposal.

Proposal 4, the ratification of the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015, requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the votes that all stockholders present in person or represented by proxy are entitled to cast at the annual meeting. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes against this proposal. Brokers generally have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of

our independent registered public accounting firm and thus, broker non-votes are generally not expected to result fromin connection with the vote on Proposal 4.

 

No matter currently is expected to be considered at the annual meeting other than the proposals set forth in this proxy statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders. However, if any other matters are properly brought before the annual meeting for action, it is intended that the shares of our common stock represented by proxies will be voted by the persons named as proxies on the proxy card in accordance with their discretion on such matters.

 

Solicitation of Proxies

 

Our board of directors is soliciting proxies for the annual meeting from our stockholders. We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from our stockholders, including the expense of preparing and mailing the Internet Availability Notice and

3



Table of Contents

the proxy materials for the annual meeting. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, we will request that brokers, banks and other nominees that hold shares of our common stock that are beneficially owned by our stockholders send notices, proxies and proxy materials to those beneficial owners and secure those beneficial owners’ voting instructions. We will reimburse those record holders for their reasonable expenses. We may use several of our regular employees, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies from our stockholders, either personally or by telephone, Internet, telegram, facsimile or special delivery letter.

 

Assistance

 

If you need assistance in submitting your proxy or have questions regarding the annual meeting, please contact the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. Investor Relations department at (610) 925-2000 or write to: Genesis Healthcare, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348.

 

Additional Information Regarding the Internet Availability of Our Proxy Materials

We are pleased to take advantage of SEC rules that allow companies to furnish their proxy materials over the Internet. Accordingly, we sent to the majority of our stockholders the Internet Availability Notice regarding Internet availability of the proxy materials for this year’s annual meeting. Other stockholders were instead sent paper copies of the proxy materials accessible on the Internet. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials over the Internet or to request a paper copy can be found in the Internet Availability Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis by going to www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions. A stockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by mail or e-mail will remain in effect until the stockholder terminates it.

Please note that you cannot vote your shares by filling out and returning the Internet Availability Notice.  The Internet Availability Notice does, however, include instructions on how to vote your shares.

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, you are considered, with respect to those shares, the “stockholder of record.” In that case, either the Internet Availability Notice or the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders have been sent directly to you.

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record, you are considered the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” In such case, either a notice similar to the Internet Availability Notice or the Notice of Annual Meeting, this proxy statement and our 2014 Annual Report to Stockholders should have been provided (or otherwise made available) to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record on how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting.

Forward-Looking Statements

 

This proxy statement may contain “forward-looking statements” (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These statements are based on our current expectations and involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many uncertainties that affect our business, particularly those mentioned in the risk factors in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20142017 and in our subsequent periodic reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

4



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1:  ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Board Structure

 

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that our board of directors will consist of not less than three (3) nor more than nineteen (19) members, with the exact number of directors being set by our board of directors. Our board of directors has set the current number of directors at eleven (11) members. The directors are divided into three (3) classes, with each class serving for a term of three (3) years. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. Class I, which currently consists of three (3) members, Robert H. Fish, George V. Hager, Jr., and Arnold Whitman, has a term expiring at the close of our 2015 annual2018 Annual meeting of stockholders. Class II, which currently consists of four (4)has three (3) members, Robert Hartman, Joshua Hausman, James V. McKeon and David Reis, and one (1) vacancy, has a term expiring at the close of our 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders.  Class III, which currently consists of four (4)has three (3) members, James H. Bloem, John F. DePodesta Steven Fishman and Glenn S. Schafer,Terry Allison Rappuhn, and one (1) vacancy, has a term expiring at the close of our 2017 annual meeting2020 Annual Meeting of stockholders.Stockholders.  We do not currently have anytwo vacancies on our board of directors.

 

Board Nominees

 

Based upon the recommendation of our Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee, our board of directors has nominated Robert H. Fish, George V. Hager, Jr. and Arnold Whitman for election as to serve as Class I directors. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons or different persons than the nominees named. If elected, each director nominee would serve a three-year term expiring at our 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until his successor is duly elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation or removal. Biographical information on each of the nominees is furnished below under “Director Biographical Information.”

 

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE THREE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.

 

Composition of the Board of Directors

 

Set forth below is information as of April 8, 201526, 2018 regarding each director nominee and each person whose term of office as a director will continue after the annual meeting.  There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position

 

Director
Since

 

Class

 

Term
Expires

 

Age

 

Position

 

Director
Since

 

Class

 

Term
Expires

Robert H. Fish(3)

 

64

 

Director

 

2013

 

I

 

2015

 

67

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

2013

 

I

 

2018

George V. Hager, Jr.

 

59

 

Chief Executive Officer, Director

 

2015

 

I

 

2015

 

62

 

Chief Executive Officer, Director

 

2015

 

I

 

2018

Arnold Whitman(2)

 

63

 

Director

 

2015

 

I

 

2015

 

66

 

Director

 

2015

 

I

 

2018

Robert Hartman(3)

 

58

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2016

 

61

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2019

Joshua Hausman(3)

 

39

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2016

James V. McKeon(3)

 

50

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2016

James V. McKeon(2)(3)

 

53

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2019

David Reis(2)

 

54

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2016

 

57

 

Director

 

2015

 

II

 

2019

James H. Bloem(1)

 

64

 

Director

 

2015

 

III

 

2017

 

67

 

Director

 

2015

 

III

 

2020

John F. DePodesta(1)(2)

 

70

 

Director

 

2015

 

III

 

2017

 

73

 

Director

 

2015

 

III

 

2020

Steven Fishman

 

59

 

Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

2015

 

III

 

2017

Glenn S. Schafer(1)

 

65

 

Director (Lead Independent Director)

 

2006

 

III

 

2017

Terry Allison Rappuhn(1)(3)

 

61

 

Director

 

2017

 

III

 

2020

 


(1) Member of the Audit Committee.

(2) Member of the Compensation Committee.

(3) Member of the Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee.

 

The Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2014 and amended as of January 5, 2015 (as so amended, the “Purchase Agreement”) entered into between Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. (“Skilled Healthcare”) and FC-GEN in connectionOperations Investment, LLC (“FC-GEN”) pursuant to which the combination of Skilled Healthcare with the CombinationFC-GEN (the “Combination”) was effected provided that each of the parties would take all actions necessary to provide that, at the closing of the Combination (which occurred on February 2, 2015), two (2) individuals designated by Skilled Healthcare, Group, Inc., four (4) individuals designated by FC-GEN and five (5) individuals designated jointly by Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and FC-GEN would be appointed to our board of directors.  TheOther than Ms. Rappuhn, the individuals who are currently serving as the members of our board of directors were appointed consistent withpursuant to that agreement.

5



Table of Contents

Director Biographical Information

 

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Class I)

 

Robert H. FishFish..  Mr. Fish has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2013, when he joined usSkilled Healthcare as Chief Executive Officer.  He served as ourSkilled Healthcare’s Chief Executive Officer until the Combination was completed in February 2015.  During his career, Mr. Fish has served as Chairman, President or CEO of a number of healthcare companies. From 2012 until he joined Skilled Healthcare in 2013, Mr. Fish served as Managing Partner of Sonoma-Seacrest, LLC, a California health care firm specializing in strategic planning, performance improvement and merger and acquisition issues. From 2008 to 2012 he served as Chairman of REACH Medical Holdings, a regional air medical transport company, from 2005 to 2006 he served as Executive Chairman of Coram, Inc., a large home infusion provider, from 2003 to 2007 he served as Lead Director of Genesis HealthCare, LLC (“Genesis LLC”) and from 2002 to 2003 he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. (“Genesis Ventures”), a long-term care and institutional pharmacy company and predecessor in interest to Genesis Healthcare Corporation. Since April 2017, Mr. Fish has served as a director and member of the audit committee of American Renal Associates Holdings, Inc., a publicly-held provider of outpatient dialysis services.  Since 2013, Mr. Fish has served as a member of the board of directors of the non-profit St. Helena Hospital Foundation in Northern California. Mr. Fish has also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of St. Joseph Health System—Sonoma County and Valleycare Health System, both of which are regional hospital systems in Northern California.

 

Mr. Fish has extensive experience as a healthcare company executive, including in the long-term care industry.  For these reasons, and his former role as our Chief Executive Officer, our board of directors concluded that Mr. Fish should serve as a director.

 

George V. Hager, Jr.  Mr. Hager has served as Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. since the Combination was completed in February 2015.  From 2003 until February 2015, Mr. Hager served as Chief Executive Officer of Genesis HealthCare, LLC (“Genesis HealthCare”), a principal subsidiary of FC-GEN, and a successor in interest to Genesis Healthcare Corporation.LLC. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Genesis HealthCare,LLC, and was responsible for corporate finance, information services, reimbursement and risk management. He joined Genesis HealthCareLLC in 1992 as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in 1994. Mr. Hager has over 25 years of experience in the healthcare industry. He spent the first 13 years of his professional career at KPMG, LLP, where he was the partner in charge of the healthcare practice group for the Philadelphia region from 1989 to 1992.

Mr. Hager is a certified public accountant and is a member of the boards of Dickinson College, the Delaware Valley Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association and the Schwartz Center for Compassionate Care. Previously, he was a member of the board and the Audit Committee chair of both REACH Medical Holdings, Inc., a medical transportation company, and Adolor Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company. In addition, Mr. Hager has served as a member of the board of trustees and the Finance Committee, and as chair of the Audit Committee, of The University of the Sciences of Philadelphia.

 

Our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Hager should serve as a director based upon his extensive experience as a healthcare company executive, including his longstanding service as Chief Executive Officer of Genesis HealthCare.LLC.

 

Arnold Whitman.  Mr. Whitman is Co-Founder and Chairman of Formation Capital, LLC (“Formation Capital”). He has over 25 years’ experience in the seniors housing and healthcare industry. In 1999, Mr. Whitman created Formation Capital as an advisory and equity investment firm for seniors housing and healthcare. Since founding the company, Mr. Whitman has overseen the investment of over $5 billion in seniors housing assets managed by Formation Capital.

Prior to co-founding Formation Capital, Mr. Whitman founded Health Care Capital Finance (“HCCF”), a private debt provider, where he developed a successful securitization program for seniors housing assets. Following the merger of HCCF into PRN Mortgage Capital, Mr. Whitman continued to oversee over $2 billion of debt investments into seniors housing and care. Mr. Whitman began his career in healthcare in 1985 as a Director of Acquisitions for MediPlex and then as a Vice President of Meditrust in 1986.

Mr. Whitman is a current board member and Chairman Emeritus of the National Investment Center for Seniors Housing and Care Industries and also serves on the executive board of the American Seniors Housing Association. His other interests in the industry include beingHe is also a partner in Aging 2.0, a principal in Prime Care Properties, LLC and a board member of Care Institute Group, Inc. He served on the board of FC-GEN until the consummation of the Combination in February 2015.

 

Mr. Whitman’s extensive experience in the healthcare industry, and particularly with companies who serve seniors, as well as his significant beneficial ownership in the company’s stock, as described below in “Security Ownership of Directors

6



Table of Contents

and Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners,” led the board of directors to conclude that Mr. Whitman should serve as a member of the board of directors.

Directors Continuing in Office Until the 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Class II)

 

Robert Hartman. Mr. Hartman has been the Chairman of NuCare Services Corp. since 1984,, which provides business and financial consulting services to the long term care industry.

industry, since 1984.  Mr. Hartman has over 35 years of development and operational experience in providing senior services ranging from assisted living to post-acute care. He has been involved with the start-up and creation of over 30 businesses primarily related to the healthcare and real estate fields. He sits on the board of Formation Development Group. Additionally, Mr. Hartman is Principal and Founder of Midway Capital Partners, a private equity fund that invests in real estate, hospitality and healthcare development opportunities. He served on the board of FC-GEN until the consummation of the Combination in February 2015.

Mr. Hartman’s civic responsibilities include servingHartman has served as co-President of the Illinois Council on Long Term Care, a statewide trade association. He served for six years as a Trustee of Northeastern Illinois University and for 18 years as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Keshet, an educational, camping and social service organization for individuals with special needs.  He was recently elected as Trustee of the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

 

The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Hartman should serve as a member of the board of directors due to the great breadth and depth of operational and financial experience that he has in the senior services industry, as well as his significant beneficial ownership in the company’s stock, as described below in “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners.”

 

Joshua Hausman. Mr. Hausman is a Managing Director of Onex Corporation and is actively involved in Onex Corporation’s healthcare investment activities. Mr. Hausman has been with Onex Corporation since 2004 and has served in his current role as Managing Director since January 2013. Prior to joining Onex Corporation, Mr. Hausman worked in the investment banking division of Banc of America Securities LLC as part of the healthcare group. Mr. Hausman has previously served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee for the Center for Diagnostic Imaging.

Based upon Mr. Hausman’s extensive experience with healthcare companies, his experience in finance and auditing and his significant beneficial ownership in the company’s stock, as described below in “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners,” the board of directors has concluded that he should serve as a director.

James V. McKeon. Mr. McKeon is currently the President of Valentine Associates LLC (“Valentine Associates”), a position he has held since January 2009. Valentine Associates is a Pennsylvania-based consulting firm specializing in finance, strategic planning, performance improvement and merger and acquisition issues. Valentine Associates has performed consulting services for both Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and Genesis HealthCare.LLC. From January 2009 until December 2014, Mr. McKeon served as a consultant to and officer of Tech Pharmacy Services, Inc., which services five Genesis HealthCareserviced nursing facilities for pharmacy and related supplies.  From November 2008 to April 2011, Mr. McKeon was the co-owner and Chief Financial Officer of Primo Sport, Inc., a start-up sports technology firm. From December 2003 to October 2008, Mr. McKeon served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Genesis HealthCare.LLC. From June 1994 to December 2003, he held various positions at Genesis Ventures—Health Ventures, LLC (“Genesis Health Ventures”): he was Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller from November 2000 to December 2003, Vice President and Corporate Controller from April 1997 to November 2000 and Director, Finance and Investor Relations from June 1994 to November 1995. Mr. McKeon started his career at KPMG Peat Marwick (“KPMG”), a professional services company, where he worked from September 1986 until June 1994; he1994. He held a variety of positions at KPMG during his tenure and was a senior manager upon departure.

Mr. McKeon also serves as a director for Educational Credit Management Corporation (“ECMC”), a not-for-profit focused on ensuring adequate liquidity to finance secondary education, a position he has held since January 2009. Mr. McKeon also serves as Chairman of the Audit Committee for ECMC, a position he has held since May 2011. From January 2006 to January 2012, he was an officer and a director of Tug McGraw Foundation, a not-for-profit focused on quality of life issues for brain tumor patients and families.

 

The board of directors has concluded that, based upon Mr. McKeon’s extensive experience in the healthcare industry, as well as his familiarity with Genesis Healthcare, Inc.the company and its predecessor companies, cause the board of directors to conclude that he should serve as a director.member of the board of directors.

 

David Reis. Since 1988, Mr. Reis has been the Chief Executive Officer of Senior Care Development, LLC, a company that specializes in the development and turnaround of distressed continuing care retirement communities. Senior Care Development also has over 25 years of experience in developing and owning standalone skilled nursing facilities and assisted

7



Table of Contents

living communities.  Mr. Reis is also the Chief Executive Officer of Falcon Investors, LLC (“Falcon Investors”), a position he has held since 2004. Falcon Investors specializes in the development and turnaround of unique assets, and is the managing member and an owner of the company that developed the St. Regis Deer Valley ski-in/ski-out resort, as well as managing the successful turnaround of MetroSouth Hospital in Blue Island, Chicago. He served on the board of FC-GEN until the consummation of the Combination in February 2015.

 

The board of directors has concluded that, based upon Mr. Reis’ extensive experience in the healthcare industry, particularly with companies that serve seniors, as well as his significant beneficial ownership in the company’s stock, as described below in “Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners,” he should serve as a member of the board of directors.

 

Directors Continuing in Office Until the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Class III)

 

James H. BloemBloem.. Mr. Bloem retired on December 31,has served as a director and business consultant to various public and private companies, mainly in the health-care industry, since his retirement in 2013 after 13 years as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer of Humana, Inc. (“Humana”), one of the nation’s largest health benefithealth-benefit companies. He joinedAt Humana, in 2001 andhe had responsibility for all of the Humana’s accounting, actuarial, analytical, financial, tax, risk management, treasury, and investor relations activities. Mr. Bloem alsocurrently serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors of ResCare, Inc., as well as a director of the following health-care companies that are, or during his tenure were, publicly-held: (1) Allergan plc (not standing for re-election in 2018), a global pharmaceutical company, where he serves on the audit as well as corporate governance and nominating committees; (2) ResCare, Inc. (publicly-held until 2010), a leading provider of services to people with disabilities as well as work-force training and home-care needs, where he serves as

Board Chair; and (3) Rotech Healthcare, Inc. (publicly-held until 2012), a leading provider of home medical equipment and a directorrelated services, where he serves as chairman of Actavis plc.the audit committee. He also previously served as a director of Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. from 2001 to 2003.2001-2003 and NeighborCare from 2003-2005. Mr. Bloem’s financial background and experience qualify him as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.

 

The board of directors has concluded that Mr. Bloem should serve as a director, based upon his extensive experience in the healthcare industry, including as an executive officer of Humana, as well as his leadership skills and financial knowledge, which enable him to serve as a financial expert on and chairperson of our audit committee.Audit Committee.

 

John F. DePodestaDePodesta.Mr. DePodesta co-founded Primus Telecommunications Group, Inc. (“Primus”) in 1994, and served as the company’s Director, Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Corporate Development Officer and Secretary from 1994 to 2010.  In 2009, Primus was listed asfiled a Fortune 1000 company during its fifth yearvoluntary petition in bankruptcy court for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of operation.the United States Bankruptcy Code.  From 1994 to 2002, Mr. DePodesta served as the Chairman of the Board of Iron Road Railways, Inc., which he also co-founded. He served as Senior Vice President, Law and Public Policy, of Genesis Ventures from 1996 to 1998. Additionally, from 1994 to 1999, he served as “of counsel” to the law firm of Pepper Hamilton LLP, where he was previously a partner since 1979. Before Joiningjoining Pepper Hamilton LLP, Mr. DePodesta served as General Counsel of Consolidated Rail Corporation and General Counsel—Reorganization for the Penn Central Trustees during the period from 1970 to 1979. Since 1994, he has served as a director of Educational Credit Management Corporation Group, where he is currently Chairman of the Board, Chairman of the Governance and Compensation Committee and Chairman of the Board of Educational Credit Management Corporation’sCorporation Group’s for-profit and non-profit subsidiaries. Mr. DePodesta also served as a director of Genesis HealthCareLLC from 2003 until 2007, where he was a member of the Audit Committee and the Special Committee. Since AugustFrom 2011 until 2015, Mr. DePodesta has served as a director of Sutron Corporation and is currentlywas Chairman of the Governance and Compensation Committee and a member of the Audit Committee. Since April 2010, Mr. DePodesta has served as Managing Director of Dolomite Group, LLC, which provides advisory services to senior executives and public and private governing bodies.

 

Mr. DePodesta has extensive experience in law and regulation, corporate governance, corporate management, mergers and acquisitions, equity and debt financing, restructuring and working with healthcare and high growth technology companies.  TheBased on this experience, the board of directors has concluded based upon his experience, that he should serve as a director.

 

Steven FishmanTerry Allison Rappuhn. Mr. Fishman is Co-Founder, President and Co-Chairman of Formation Capital. Since Formation Capital’s inception in 1999, Mr. Fishman Ms. Rappuhn has invested over $5 billion, comprising over 55,000 seniors housing beds, in senior housing and healthcare services companies. As President, Mr. Fishman leads Formation Capital’s deal origination and fundraising efforts. In April 2011, Mr. Fishman led the sale of the real estate assets of Genesis HealthCare to Health Care REIT for $2.4 billion. He served on the board of FC-GEN untildirectors and as the consummationchair of the Combination in February 2015. Mr. Fishmanaudit committee of Quorum Health Corporation, a publicly-held operator of general acute care hospitals and outpatient services, since 2017 and as the Chair of the board of directors of Quorum since March 2018.  She has been active in the healthcare and real estate industries for over 30 years. Prior to founding Formation Capital, Mr. Fishman spent 20 yearsserved Akorn, Inc., a publicly-held specialty pharmaceutical company, as a CPA servingdirector and member of the healthaudit committee of since 2015, as a member of the nominating and governance committee since 2016 and as the chairperson of the audit committee since 2017. From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Rappuhn served on the board of directors and audit committee of Span-America Medical Systems, Inc. (previously a publicly held company that was acquired by Savaria Corporation), a manufacturer of beds and pressure management products for the medical market. From 2006 to 2010, she served as a director and chaired the audit committee of AGA Medical Holdings, Inc. (previously a publicly-held company that was acquired by St. Jude Medical), a medical device company.  From 2003 to 2007, she served as a director of Genesis HealthCare Corporation, where she chaired the audit committee. From 1999 to April 2001, Ms. Rappuhn served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Quorum Health Group, Inc., an owner and operator of acute care hospitals. From 1996 to 1999 and real estate industries.from 1993 to 1996, Ms. Rappuhn served as Quorum’s Vice President, Controller and Assistant Treasurer and as Vice President, Internal Audit, respectively. Ms. Rappuhn has 15 years of experience with Ernst & Young, LLP and is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

The board of directors has concluded that Mr. FishmanMs. Rappuhn should serve as a director based on the board based upon hisher extensive experience in the healthcare industry, her financial background and real estate industries,experience which qualifies her as well as his significant beneficial ownership in the company’s stock, as described below in “Security Ownership of Directorsan “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules and Executive Officersher knowledge and Certain Beneficial Owners.”

Glenn S. Schafer. Mr. Schafer has served as a member of our board of directors since April 2006, and served as our Chairman of the Board (non-executive) from November 2013 until February 2015. Since December 2007, Mr. Schafer has served on the board of directors of Janus Capital Group, a NYSE-listed asset manager. He also served on the board of directors of Beckman Coulter, Inc., a NYSE-listed diagnostics and medical device company, from 2002 until the company’s sale in

8



Table of Contents

2011, including as Lead Independent Director beginning in February 2010 and Non-executive Chairman beginning in September 2010. Mr. Schafer serves on the board of directors of the Michigan State University Foundation, a non-profit entity that supports the university’s strategic needs, as well as on the board of directors of GeoOptics, Inc., an environmental earth observation company.

Previously, Mr. Schafer held various positions at Pacific Life Insurance Company (“Pacific Life”), a provider of life insurance products, annuities and mutual funds, having served as Vice Chairman from April 2005 until his retirement on December 31, 2005, President and a director since 1995, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1991 to 1995, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 1987 to 1991 and Vice President, Corporate Finance from 1986 to 1987. Mr. Schafer also served as a director of Scottish Re Group Limited, a publicly traded (OTC) global life reinsurance specialist, from 2001 to 2005 and 2007 to 2008.

Mr. Schafer brings financial expertise and demonstrated leadership and governance experience with large NYSE-listed companies to our board of directors. His experience as President and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Life Insurance Company allows for the contribution of valuable management and financial insight to the board of directors and provides him with a keen understanding of the interplay between our operations and financial results. Mr. Schafer’s experience at Pacific Life, overseeing a wide array of that company’s financial products, coupled with his experience on the audit committee of Janus Capital Group, provide the foundation for applying his knowledge to the day-to-day responsibilities of our audit committee.  For these reasons our board of directors has concluded that Mr. Schafer should serve as a director.corporate governance matters.

9



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Our board of directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines that provide the framework for our overall governance practices. Our board of directors has also adopted a code of conduct, which contains general guidelines for conducting our business that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, our principal accounting officer and our controller.  See “— Code of Conduct.” Our corporate governance guidelines and code of conduct can be found on the corporate governance page in the investor relations section of our website at www.genesishcc.com. The inclusion of ourInformation contained on, or accessible through, any website address in this proxy statementreferenced herein does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website intoconstitute a part of this proxy statement.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Our Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer roles have been separated since November 2013.are separated.  Mr. Hager has served as our Chief Executive Officer since the Combination in 2015, Steven Fishman served as Chairman from 2015 until his resignation from the board of directors in April 2017, and Mr. FishmanFish has served as our Chairman of the Board, since immediately following the consummation of the Combination in February 2015.  From November 2013 until February 2015, Mr. Fish served as our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Schafer served as our Chairman of the Board. Mr. Schafer has served as Lead Independent Director since March 2015.April 2017.   Our board of directors has determined that it is presently desirable for different individuals to hold the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board,board of directors, which enables Mr. Hager to focus more of his time and efforts on his operational leadership responsibilities and enablesallows Mr. FishmanFish to similarly focus on his board leadership responsibilities.  Additionally, we believe that having an independent director such as Mr. Schafer, serve as Lead Independent Director facilitates meaningful participation of independent directors in the leadership and functioning of our board of directors.  Glen Schafer served as Lead Independent Director from 2015 through June 2017, Mr. DePodesta served as Lead Independent Director from June 2017 until February 2018, and Mr. Fish has been the Lead Independent Director since February 2018.

 

FourThe corporate governance guidelines provide that the lead independent director is responsible for periodically scheduling and conducting separate meetings of the independent directors, coordinating the activities of the independent directors, providing input into agendas for meetings of the board of directors and performing various other duties as may be appropriate, including advising the Chairman of the board of directors. The lead independent director also participates in connection with the scheduling of meetings of the board of directors.

Five of our elevennine current directors are “independent” directors, as defined by New York Stock ExchangeNYSE standards. To promote open discussion among our non-management directors, our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without management participation. Mr. Fishman, asAs Chairman of the Board,board of directors, Mr. Fish presides over our board meetings including executive sessions of non-employee directors, and is ablehas the ability to set the agenda of the meetings of the board meetingsof directors and executive sessions and take any follow-up action as he deems necessary.sessions.

 

The board of directors recognizes the importance of regularly evaluating our particular circumstances to determine if our leadership structure continues to serve the best interests of us and our stockholders. To this end, the board of directors from time to time has assessed, and will continue to assess, whether its leadership structure remains the most appropriate for our organization, and it may from time to time elect to make changes to the leadership structure.

During 2014 and through the consummation of the Combination in February 2015, our board of directors consisted of seven members.  Of those seven members, all of the members except Messrs. Schafer and Fish tendered their resignation upon the consummation of the Combination, as contemplated by the agreement governing the transaction.  As contemplated by the Combination and provided in our bylaws, the remaining directors subsequently (following the consummation of the Combination) fixed the number of directors constituting the full board at 11 members, re-designated our Class I directorships as Class III directorships, Class II directorships as Class I directorships, and Class III directorships as Class II directorships, and appointed Messrs. Bloem, DePodesta, Fishman, Hager, Hartman, Hausman, McKeon, Reis and Whitman to fill the resulting vacancies in the applicable classes of directors (as noted in the table above).

 

Board Independence

 

We are a “controlled company,” as that term is set forth in Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, due to the fact that the holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock (the “Voting Group”) have entered into a voting agreementVoting Agreement (as defined below) governing, among other things, the election of our directors (the “Voting Agreement”).directors.  For as long as we continue to qualify as a “controlled company,” we are not required to comply with certain NYSE standards.  UnderSpecifically, under the NYSE rules, a “controlled company” may elect not to comply with certain NYSE corporate governance requirements, including (1) the requirement that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors, (2) the requirement that the our nominating/corporate governance committee (i.e., our Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee) be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (3) the requirement that our Compensation Committee be composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities and (4) the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee and the Compensation Committee.responsibilities.

 

Our board of directors performs an analysis, at least annually, as to whether each member of our board of directors is an “independent director,” as that term is defined in the applicable NYSE listing standards. In making its independence determination, our board of directors considers all relevant facts and circumstances (ofof which it is aware),aware, and not merely from the standpoint of the director, but also from that of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. For example, the board of directors considers transactions and relationships between each director (including nominees for director), or any member of his or her immediate family, and us and our subsidiaries and affiliates in each of the most recent three completed

10



Table of Contents

fiscal years. Our board of directors also considers whether there were any transactions or relationships between directors or any member of their immediate family (or any entity of which a director or an immediate family member is an executive officer, general partner, or significant equity holder). Our board of directors considers that in the ordinary course of business, transactions may occur between us and our subsidiaries and companies at which some of our directors are or have

been officers. Our board of directors also considers any relevant charitable contributions to not-for-profit organizations of which our directors or immediate family members are affiliated. In making its independence determinations, our board of directors considers all relationships between us and the director and the director’s family members of which it was aware.

 

As a result of its review, our board of directors has determined that, of our current directors and nominees, each of Messrs. Bloem, DePodesta, HausmanFish and SchaferMcKeon and Ms. Rappuhn, is an independent member of our board of directors under the applicable listing standards of the NYSE. With respect to the persons who served on our board of directors at any time during 2014 and up until the closing of the Combination in February 2015, our board of directors determined that Michael Boxer, Bernard Puckett, Glenn Schafer, Linda Rosenstock and Bruce Yarwood were each independent members under the aforementioned standards. Please see the relationships discussed under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a description of othercertain relationships considered by our board of directors.directors in making its independence determinations.

 

Board Meetings

 

Our board of directors held 1115 meetings during fiscal year 2014.2017. During fiscal year 2014,2017, all directors who were then serving attended at least 75% of the combined total of (i) all board meetings and (ii) all meetings of committees of our board of directors of which the director was a member. The Chairman of the Boardboard of directors or his designee, taking into account suggestions from other members of the board membersof directors and executive officers, establishes the agenda for each meeting of the board meetingof directors and the agenda is distributed in advance to each member of our board of directors. Each member of the board member is free toof directors may suggest the inclusion of items on the agenda and to raise additional discussion items at the meetings. Our board of directors regularly meets in executive session without management present.  We have a policy that ourOur directors will make reasonable effortsare encouraged to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. Five of our seven board members who were in office at the time of the 2014each annual meeting of stockholders, and each member of our board of directors, with the exception of Mr. Reis, attended that meeting.the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

 

Our board of directors maintains a standing Audit Committee, Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee (the “Corporate Governance Committee”) and Compensation Committee. To view the charter of each of these committees, please visit the corporate governance page in the investor relations section of our website at www.genesishcc.com. The inclusion of ourInformation contained on, or accessible through, any website address in this proxy statementreferenced herein does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website intoconstitute a part of this proxy statement.

 

Because we are a “controlled company,” we elect to utilize some of the exemptions listed above under “—Board Independence,Independence.”  as described below. At all times during 2014 we had a board of directors comprised of a majority of independent directors. Furthermore, at all times during 2014,Since January 1, 2017, all of the members of our Audit Committee and at least one of the members of each of our Compensation Committee and our Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee (which during 2014 was called the Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee) were independent directors, and all members of our Compensation Committee (excluding Robert M. Le Blanc) were independent directors. Currently none of the members of our Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee, and one of the members of our Compensation Committee, are directors who have been deemed to be independent under applicable NYSE rules.

 

11



Table of Contents

The membership of each of our standing committeesAudit Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee as of the April 8, 2015 record date for the annual meeting26, 2018 is as follows:

 

Director

 

Independent
Under NYSE
NYSE Standards

 

Audit
Committee

 

Nominating,
Corporate
Governance,
Quality and
Compliance
Committee

 

Compensation
Committee

James H. Bloem

 

Yes

 

“C”C

 

 

 

 

John F. DePodesta

 

Yes

 

*

 

 

 

*

Robert H. FishC

 

No

“C”

*

Robert Hartman

 

No

 

 

 

*

 

 

Joshua HausmanJames V. McKeon

 

Yes

 

 

 

*C

 

*

 

James V. McKeonTerry Allison Rappuhn

 

No

Yes

 

*

*

 

 

David Reis

 

No

 

 

 

 

 

“C”

Glenn S. Schafer

Yes

*

 

Arnold Whitman

 

No

 

 

 

 

 

*

 


*            Member

“C”C          Chair

 

Audit Committee

 

We have a standing Audit Committee. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm and for reviewing and discussing prior to filing or issuance, with our management and our independent registered public accounting firm our audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and earnings press releases. The Audit Committee carries out its responsibilities in accordance with the terms of its charter. The Audit Committee has authority to retain any independent counsel, experts or advisors (accounting, financial or otherwise) that the committee believes to be necessary or appropriate.

In fiscal year 2014, Messrs. Boxer (Chair), Puckett and Schafer were the members of the Audit Committee. During fiscal year 2014,2017, the Audit Committee held four meetings.12 meetings and took action by unanimous written consent once. The current members of the Audit Committee beginning in February 2015, are Messrs. Bloem (Chair), and DePodesta and Schafer.Ms. Rappuhn. Our board of directors has determined that all members of our Audit Committee are financially literate under the current listing standards of the NYSE and are independent under the NYSE standards and the requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3. Our board of directors has also determined that each of Mr. Bloem and Ms. Rappuhn qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Exchange Act. In fiscal year 2014, all of the then-serving members of the Audit Committee were determined by the board of directors to be financially literate and independent under the aforementioned standards, and Mr. Boxer qualified as an “audit committee financial expert.”(the “Exchange Act”).

 

Nominating Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee

 

We have a standing Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee, or Corporate Governance Committee. In fiscal year 2014, Dr. Linda Rosenstock (Chair), and Messrs. Yarwood and Boxer were the members of the Corporate Governance Committee (which was, at the time, called the Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee). During fiscal year 2014,2017, the Corporate Governance Committee held foursix meetings. The current members of the Corporate Governance Committee beginning in February 2015, are Messrs. FishMcKeon (Chair), and Hartman Hausman and McKeon.Ms. Rappuhn.

 

The purpose of the Corporate Governance Committee is to make recommendations concerning the size and composition of our board of directors and its committees, oversee and evaluate and recommend candidates for election as directors, evaluate and recommend compensation paid to non-employee directors, develop, implement and review our corporate governance policies, evaluate our board of directors and management, oversee succession planning by management and review and oversee our policies and procedures that support and enhance the quality of care provided by our affiliates and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and industry guidelines. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for annually considering the appropriate skills and characteristics required of members of the board membersof directors in the context of the current make-up of our board of directors and its committees and for making board composition and nomination recommendations to the board of directors.

 

Our entire board of directors is responsible for nominating members for election to our board of directors and for filling vacancies on our board of directors that may occur between annual meetings of stockholders. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, screening and recommending candidates to the entire board of directors for prospective board

12



Table of Contents

membership. In evaluating the suitability of individuals, the Corporate Governance Committee considers many factors, including:

 

·                  personal and professional integrity, ethics and values;

·                  experience in corporate management, such as serving as an officer or former officer of a publicly held company, and a general understanding of marketing, finance and other elements relevant to the success of a publicly-traded company in today’s business environment;

·                  experience in the company’s industry;

·                  experience as a board member of another publicly held company;

·                  academic expertise in an area of the company’s operations;

·                  diversity of industry experience, gender, ethnicity and other diversity-related factors the committee may deem appropriate; and

·                  practical and mature business judgment, including ability to make independent analytical inquiries.

 

When formulating its board membership recommendations, the Corporate Governance Committee also considers any advice and recommendations offered by other members of the board members.of directors. The Corporate Governance Committee may also review the composition and qualification of the board of directors of our competitors or other companies and may seek input from industry experts.

 

In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Corporate Governance Committee also considers our board of directors’ and each committee’s annual performance self-evaluations, which address, among other things, the directors’ attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of our board of directors.self-evaluations. All directors are encouraged to attend periodically attend director education programs or seminars.

 

The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of our board of directors as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that it feels can best perpetuate success for our company and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment. Included in this evaluation is a consideration of the diversity each director or nominee brings to our board of directors, with diversity reflecting varied industry and professional experience, ethnicity and viewpoints, and other factors, as applicable.

 

The Corporate Governance Committee will consider stockholder recommendations of candidates for the board of directors on the same basis as it considers other candidates. Stockholder recommendations must be submitted to us under the procedures discussed below in “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations,”Nominations” and should include the information discussed in that section, as required by our bylaws.

Compensation Committee

 

We have a standing Compensation Committee. In fiscal year 2014 the members of the Compensation Committee were Messrs. Puckett (Chair), Le Blanc, Schafer and Yarwood and Dr. Rosenstock. The Compensation Committee held fourfive meetings and took action by unanimous written consent once in fiscal year 2014.2017. The current members of the Compensation Committee beginning in February 2015, are Messrs. ReisDePodesta (Chair), DePodesta, FishMcKeon, Reis and Whitman. Our board has determined that Mr. DePodesta qualifies as anFor most of 2017, the Compensation Committee consisted of one independent director and three non-independent directors as defined under applicable NYSE standards.rules.

 

The Compensation Committee reviews and establishes our compensation philosophy,approves the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and the compensation of all other officers (as that term is defined in Rule 16a-1 under the Securities Exchange ActAct), including the approval of 1934, as amended. The Compensation Committee also has direct access to third-party compensation consultants, and reviews any grant of stock options, restricted stock or other equity awards to eligible employeesthe CEO and other officers under our equity incentive plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews our compensation philosophy and has direct access to third-party compensation consultants.

 

The Compensation Committee also makes recommendations to our board of directors with respect to our incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans and reviews and approves all executive officers’ employment agreements and severance arrangements. The Compensation Committee also manages and periodically reviews all annual bonus, long-term incentive compensation and equity incentive plans (including restricted stock plans, long-term incentive plans, management incentive plans and others). The Compensation Committee also determines annually the annual cash bonuses to be awarded to our executive officers and certain members of senior management based upon pre-established financial and operational performance criteria set under our annual performance bonus program. To assist the Compensation Committee, our Chief Executive Officer may make recommendations regarding our other executive officers’ compensation based on his evaluation of the performance of the other executive officer against objectives established at the beginning of each year, the officer’s scope of responsibilities, our financial performance, retention considerations and general economic and competitive conditions. The Compensation Committee is permitted to delegate certain of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee.

 

13



Table of Contents

In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority to retain consultants and advisors as it may deem appropriate in its discretion, and the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve related fees and other retention terms. In 20142017 and prior years, the Compensation Committee engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC which we refer to as the consultant,(“Pearl Meyer”) to advise the Compensation Committee on an ongoing basis as an independent compensation consultant.  The consultantPearl Meyer reports directly to the Compensation Committee. While conducting assignments, the consultantPearl Meyer interacts with our management when appropriate. Specifically, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary and our senior human resources personnel interacted with the consultant from time to time to provide relevant company and executive compensation data. In addition, the consultant may seek feedback from the Chairman of the Compensation Committee, other members of our board of directors or the Chief Executive Officer regarding its work prior to presenting study results or recommendations to the Compensation Committee. The consultant,Pearl Meyer, when invited, attends, or otherwise participates in, meetings of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines when to hire, terminate or replace the consultant, and the projects to be performed by the consultant. During late 2012 and early 2013, the consultant, at the request of the Compensation Committee, performed a comprehensive review of the competitiveness of our senior management and non-employee director compensation programs.  The consultant was not asked to perform a similar review in 2014. The Compensation Committee may engage the consultant, or another compensation consultant, to conduct reviews of our senior management compensation programs in the future.

 

After review and consultation with the consultant,Pearl Meyer, the Compensation Committee determined there was no conflict of interest resulting from retaining the consultantPearl Meyer during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.  In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in Rule 10C-1 of the Exchange Act.  The Compensation Committee anticipates that it will retain Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC to advise the committeeCompensation Committee on certain compensation matters in 2015,2018.  In making this determination, the Compensation Committee noted that during 2017:

·                  Pearl Meyer did not provide any services to the company or its management other than service to the Compensation Committee, and its services were limited to executive and Board compensation consulting. Specifically, it did not provide, directly or indirectly through affiliates, any non-executive compensation services, including, but undernot limited to, pension consulting or human resource outsourcing;

·                  Fees from the company were less than 1% of Pearl Meyer’s total revenue;

·                  None of the Pearl Meyer consultants who worked on company matters had any business or personal relationship with Compensation Committee members or directly owns company stock; and

·                  None of the Pearl Meyer consultants who worked on company matters, or Pearl Meyer, as a whole, had any business or personal relationship with executive officers of the company.

The Compensation Committee continues to monitor the independence of its charter the committee has the discretion to retain (or not retain) compensation and other advisors as it may choose in its discretion.consultant on a periodic basis.

 

Risk Oversight

 

While our board of directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the board of directors also have responsibility for overseeing specific areas of risk management, as set forth below. Members of management provide regular reports to the board of directors and its committees for discussion, including reports on business operations, strategic planning, personnel matters and benefit plans, financial planning and budgeting, material litigation and succession matters, and will discuss any material risks to the company relating to such matters.   The committees periodically provide updates to the board of directors regarding significant risk management issues and related matters.

Committee

 

Primary Risk Oversight Responsibility

Audit Committee

 

Overseeing financial risk, capital risk, and financial compliance risk and cybersecurity risk and internal controls over financial reporting.

Compensation Committee

 

Overseeing our compensation philosophy and practices and evaluating the balance between risk-taking and rewards to senior officers, as further discussed below.

Nominating, Corporate Governance, Quality and Compliance Committee

 

Evaluating each director’s independence and the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelinescorporate governance guidelines and Codecode of Conduct,conduct, overseeing management’s succession planning and overseeing quality of care and regulatory compliance risks.

 

We continue to utilize and refine our Enterprise Risk Management, or ERM, program, particularly in light of the recently completed Combination. Employing an ERM program has enabled us to formalize our risk governance procedures and risk philosophy, as well as identify and assess enterprise risks and their potential impact and likelihood of occurrence. Our board of directors plays an important role in the oversight of the ERM program. The ERM program has been designed to be dynamic so that management may respond to a broad range of potential risks on an ongoing basis. Our board of directors receives periodic reports on management’s ERM initiatives, including a baseline identification, prioritization and assessment of potential risks in the areas of operations, regulatory, finance, human resources, strategy, legal and technology, among others. An additional component of the reports to our board of directors is the presentation of proposed responses to identified risks, planning and implementation of control activities designed to mitigate identified or potential risks, and an evaluation of the achievement of objectives.

Communication with the Board of Directors

 

We provide a process for stockholders to send communications to the board of directors, the non-management directors as a group,Stockholders or any of the directors individually, including the Lead Independent Director. Stockholdersother interested parties may contact any of our directors, including our non-management directors, by writing to them c/o Office of the General Counsel, Genesis Healthcare, Inc., 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, PA 19348 or by email at lawdepartment@genesishcc.com or by telephone at (610) 925-2000. The Lead Independent Director, with the assistance of the company’s internal legal department, is primarily responsible for monitoring communications from stockholders and providing copies of such communications to the other

14



Table of Contents

directors as he or she considers appropriate. Communications will be forwarded to all directors if they relate to substantive matters and include suggestions or comments that the Lead Independent Director considers to be important for the directors to consider. All communications will be compiled by the Office of the General Counsel and submitted to the board of directors or the individual directors on a periodic basis.

 

Code of Conduct

 

We maintain a code of business conduct and ethics (entitledentitled “The Genesis Healthcare Code of Conduct”),Conduct,” which is applicable to our directors, officers and employees and any independent contractors performing functions similar to those of employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. The code of business conduct and ethics addresses ethical conduct, commitment to quality care, full, fair and accurate disclosure in documents that we file with the SEC and other regulatory agencies, compliance with laws, regulations and professional standards, and the process for reporting suspected violations of the code. You can access our code of business conduct and ethics, free of charge, on the corporate governance page in the investor relations section of our website at www.genesishcc.com. The inclusion of ourInformation contained on, or accessible through, any website address in this proxy statementreferenced herein does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website intoconstitute a part of this proxy statement. In the event of any future amendments to certain provisions of our code of business conduct and ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to our directors and executive officers, we intend to disclose such amendments or waivers at the same location on our website identified above.  Our current code of business conduct and ethics was adopted by our board of directors on February 3, 2015, and it superseded our prior code of business conduct and ethics.in 2015.

15



Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS

 

The following table shows ownership of our common stock as of April 8, 2015, based on 73,587,665 shares of Class A common stock, 15,511,603 shares of Class B common stock, and  64,449,380 shares of Class C common stock outstanding on that date, by9, 2018 by: (i) each person known to us to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of any class of our capital stock; (ii) each director; (iii) our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and each of our other three most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended December 31, 20142017 (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”); and (iv) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group.

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned(1)

 

 

 

Shares of
Class A
Common
Stock

 

Rights to
Acquire
Class A
Common
Stock
(2)

 

Class A
Percentage
(3)

 

Shares of
Class C
Common
Stock

 

Class C
Percentage

 

Percentage of
Outstanding
Vote

 

Stockholders holding 5% or more:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voting Group(4)

 

32,530,736

 

53,796,721

 

56.5

%

53,236,698

 

89.2

%

53.8

%

Isaac Neuberger(5)

 

10,112,210

 

6,603,616

 

15.8

%

6,602,466

 

11.1

%

10.5

%

Welltower Inc. (6)

 

9,564,576

 

 

9.7

%

 

 

6.0

%

Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James H. Bloem

 

59,802

 

52,000

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

John F. DePodesta

 

 

111,802

 

*

 

 

 

 

Robert H. Fish

 

218,639

 

111,802

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

George V. Hager, Jr.(7)

 

32,530,736

 

53,796,721

 

56.5

%

53,236,698

 

89.2

%

53.8

%

Robert Hartman(8)

 

32,530,736

 

53,796,721

 

56.5

%

53,236,698

 

89.2

%

53.8

%

James V. McKeon

 

10,000

 

111,802

 

*

 

 

 

 

David Reis(9)

 

32,530,736

 

53,796,721

 

56.5

%

53,236,698

 

89.2

%

53.8

%

Terry Allison Rappuhn

 

8,425

 

52,000

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

Arnold Whitman(10)

 

32,530,736

 

53,796,721

 

56.5

%

53,236,698

 

89.2

%

53.8

%

Other Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paul Bach

 

336,814

 

422,860

 

*

 

372,996

 

*

 

*

 

Thomas DiVittorio

 

361,262

 

426,685

 

*

 

372,996

 

*

 

*

 

JoAnne Reifsnyder

 

174,610

 

396,395

 

*

 

356,958

 

*

 

*

 

Daniel Hirschfeld (11)

 

91,919

 

 

*

 

 

*

 

*

 

All current executive officers and directors as a group (13 persons)

 

34,032,029

 

55,888,794

 

58.1

%

54,712,644

 

91.6

%

55.7

%


* Less than 1%

(1)                Unless otherwise noted, percentage ownership is based on 99,001,650 shares of Class A common stock, 744,396 shares of Class B common stock, and 59,700,801 shares of Class C common stock outstanding on April 9, 2018. Restricted stock units vesting within sixty days of April 9, 2018 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the share amount and percentage ownership of the person holding such units, but we do not deem them outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except to the extentas otherwise indicated in the footnotes toor in the following table,Schedule 13D/A filed by the Voting Group with the SEC on February 16, 2018, the person or entity listed has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares that are deemed beneficially owned by such person or entity, subject to community property laws, where applicable.

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned

 

 

 

Shares of
Class A
Common
Stock

 

Rights to
Acquire
Class A
Common
Stock
(1)

 

Class A
Percentage
(2)

 

Shares of
Class B
Common
Stock

 

Class B
Percentage

 

Shares of
Class C
Common
Stock

 

Class C
Percentage

 

Percentage of
Outstanding
Vote

 

Stockholders holding 5% or more:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Voting Group(3)

 

36,679,788

 

60,774,363

 

72.5

%

 

 

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.5

%

David Reis(4)

 

4,365,780

 

9,961,608

 

17.1

%

 

 

9,959,874

 

15.5

%

9.3

%

Isaac Neuberger(5)

 

10,112,210

 

6,603,616

 

20.8

%

 

 

6,602,466

 

10.2

%

10.9

%

Onex Corporation(6)

 

 

 

 

14,750,623

 

95.1

%

 

 

9.6

%

Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

James H. Bloem

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John F. DePodesta

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert H. Fish

 

218,639

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

Steven Fishman(7)

 

36,679,788

 

60,774,363

 

72.5

%

 

 

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.5

%

George V. Hager, Jr.(8)

 

36,679,788

 

60,774,363

 

72.5

%

 

 

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.5

%

Robert Hartman(9)

 

36,679,788

 

60,774,363

 

72.5

%

 

 

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.5

%

Joshua Hausman(10)

 

 

 

 

14,750,623

 

95.1

%

 

 

9.6

%

James V. McKeon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David Reis(4)

 

4,365,780

 

9,961,608

 

17.1

%

 

 

9,959,874

 

15.5

%

9.3

%

Glenn S. Schafer

 

35,586

 

73,007

 

*

 

5,917

 

*

 

 

 

*

 

Arnold Whitman(11)

 

36,679,788

 

60,774,363

 

72.5

%

 

 

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.5

%

Other Named Executive Officers:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paxton Wiffler (former COO)

 

117,839

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

Christopher N. Felfe (former CFO)

 

92,589

 

12,326

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

Roland G. Rapp (former CAO)

 

470,801

 

188,808

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

68,311

 

5,233

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

All current executive officers and directors as a group (16 persons)

 

36,934,013

 

60,847,370

 

72.8

%

14,750,623

 

95.1

%

60,763,783

 

94.3

%

63.6

%


* Less than 1%

  Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person named in the table is c/o Genesis Healthcare, Inc., 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, PA 19348.

(1)(2)                With respect to our Mr. Felfe, Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas, represents sharesExcept as otherwise noted, consists of Class A common stock which the person has a right to acquire upon exercise of options that are vested as of April 8, 2015 or will vest within sixty (60) days thereafter. With respect to Mr. Schafer, represents shares of Class A common stock which the person has a right to acquire

16



Table of Contents

upon settlement of restricted stock units, or RSUs, which are vested as of April 8, 2015, or will vest within sixty (60) days thereafter, and for which settlement has been deferred by Mr. Schafer, as one of our non-employee directors, until the director’s date of separation from our board of directors or until another date more than 60 days after April 8, 2015. Shares of Class A common stock subject to options which are currently exercisable or which will become exercisable within sixty (60) days of April 8, 2015 or subject to RSUs which are currently vested or which will become vested within sixty (60) days of April 8, 2015, are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such options for the purposes of computing the percentage of ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage of any other person.  With respect to the Voting Group and to Messrs. Reis, Neuberger, Fishman, Hager, Hartman and Whitman, includes shares of Class A common stock which the person has a right to acquire upon exchange of Class A Common Units of FC-GEN Operations Investment, LLC (“OP Units”) andand/or conversion of shares of our Class B common stock or Class C common stock. Also includes the following shares of Class A common stock upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 9, 2018:  Messrs. Bloem, DePodesta, Fish, Hartman, McKeon, Reis and Whitman and Ms. Rappuhn, 52,000; Mr. Hager, 114,667; Mr. Bach, 49,800; Mr. DiVittorio, 53,625; Ms. Reifsnyder, 39,375; and the Voting Group, 550,754.  In addition, it includes the following number of shares of Class A common stock that the person has a right to acquire upon settlement of restricted stock units that are vested as of April 9, 2018 but for which settlement has been deferred:  Messrs. DePodesta, Fish and McKeon, 59,802; and Messrs. Hartman, Reis and Whitman, 40,000.

(2)(3)                Giving effect to conversion of all shares of our Class B and Class C common stock and exchange of all OP Units held by the named individual or group, including, in the case of the Voting Group and Messrs. Fishman, Hager, Hartman and Whitman, all shares of our Class C

common stock and all OP Units held by all members of the Voting Group. Also includes shares of our Class A common stock to be issued upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of April 9, 2018, as detailed above.

(3)(4)                According to the Schedule 13D filed by the Voting Group with the SEC on February 12, 2015 and the Schedule 13D/A filed by the Voting Group with the SEC on February 27, 2015.16, 2018, and including other transactions of which we are aware.  The Voting Group is comprised of HCCF Management Group, Inc., a Georgia corporation, HCCF Management Group XI, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FC Profit Sharing, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Arnold Whitman, Senior Care Genesis, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, OpCo Rok, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,David  Reis, ZAC Properties XI, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, Steven Fishman, George V. Hager, Jr., the Robert and Debra F. Hartman Family Trust, Midway Gen Capital, LLC, Robert Hartman, Biret Operating LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Grandview Investors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Max Moxi LLC, a New York limited liability company, GRFC Gazelle LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Gazelle Riverside LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Gazelle Light LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Gazelle Herne Hill LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, L Gen Associates, a Delaware partnership, Gazelle Sing LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Gazelle Costa Brazil LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Dreyk LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, GHC Class B LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Sing Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Larts Investments LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

(4)Includes 4,365,780 shares  The address of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire 9,961,608 shares of our Class A common stock and 9,959,874 shares of our Class C common stock held by a limited liability company of which Mr. Reisthe Voting Group is the managing member.c/o Formation Capital, LLC, 1671 JFK Boulevard, Suite 545, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

(5)                According to the Schedule 13D filed by the Voting Group with the SEC on February 12, 2015 and the Schedule 13D/A filed by the Voting Group with the SEC on February 27, 2015.16, 2018.  Includes 10,112,210 shares of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire 6,603,616 shares of our Class A common stock and 6,602,466 shares of our Class C common stock held by limited liability companies of which Mr. Neuberger is the managing member.  The address of Mr. Neuberger is One South Street, 27th Floor, Baltimore, Maryland 21202.

(6)                According to the Schedule 13D/13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 201514, 2018 by (i) Onex Corporation, an Ontario, Canada corporation (“Onex”); (ii) Onex Partners LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“OPLP”); (iii) Onex US Principals LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“USLP”); (iv) Onex Real Estate Holdings IIIWelltower Inc., a Delaware corporation (“OREH”); and (v) Gerald W. Schwartz. Onex controls, directly or indirectly, eachcorporation. The address of OPLP, USLP and OREH. Includes: 11,293,552 shares of our Class B common stock owned by OPLP as to which itWelltower Inc. is deemed to have shared power to vote and direct the disposition, 68,820 shares of our Class B common stock beneficially owned by USLP as to which it is deemed to have shared power to vote and direct the disposition, and 3,388,251 shares of our Class B common stock beneficially owned by OREH as to which it is deemed to have shared power to vote and direct the disposition. All of our shares of Class B common stock are convertible, on a 1-for-1 basis, into shares of our Class B common stock. Mr. Schwartz is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Onex Corporation and owns shares whose collective voting rights entitle him to elect a majority of the members of the Onex board of directors. Onex and Mr. Schwartz each have a pecuniary interest in less than 100% of the shares beneficially owned by OPLP, USLP and OREH. Mr. Schwartz and Onex disclaim beneficial ownership of the reported securities except to the extent of their respective pecuniary interest therein. The addresses of the foregoing are: Onex and Mr. Schwartz — 161 Bay4500 Dorr Street, P.O. Box 700, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1, Canada; OPLP — 712 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10019; and USLP and OREH — 421 Leader Street, Marion,Toledo, Ohio 43302.43615.

(7)                Mr. Fishman is a member of the Voting Group. As a result, Mr. Fishman may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class C common stock held by each member of the Voting Group.

(8)Mr. Hager is a member of the Voting Group. As a result, Mr. Hager may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class C common stock held by each member of the Voting Group.

(9)(8)                Mr. Hartman is a member of the Voting Group. As a result, Mr. Hartman may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class C common stock held by each member of the Voting Group.

17(9)



Table                Mr. Reis is a member of Contents

(10)Mr. Hausman serves as a Managing Director of Onex.the Voting Group. As a result, Mr. HausmanReis may be deemed to beneficially ownbe the reported securities, which includesbeneficial owner of all shares beneficially ownedof our Class A common stock, rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class C common stock held by Onex, OPLP, USLP and OREH. Mr. Hausman has a pecuniary interest in less than 100%each member of such shares, and he disclaims beneficial ownership of these securities.the Voting Group.

(11)(10)         Mr. Whitman is a member of the Voting Group. As a result, Mr. Whitman may be deemed to be the beneficial owner of all shares of our Class A common stock, rights to acquire shares of our Class A common stock and shares of our Class C common stock held by each member of the Voting Group.

(11)        Mr. Hirschfeld resigned from the company effective January 31, 2018.

 

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. Based solely on a review of copies of such forms received with respect to fiscal year 20142017 and the written representations received from certain reporting persons that no other reports were required, we believe that all directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock have complied with the reporting requirements of Section 16(a), except that, due to an administrative oversight, John Mitchell, our former Senior Vice President of Legal Affairs and Chief Compliance Officer, filed a late Form 4 in March 2014 to report his receipt of a grant of restricted stock, subject to our standard time-based vesting requirements, in February 2014, and Laurie Thomas, our former President, Ancillary Business, filed a late Form 4 in January 2015 to report her forfeiture to the company of shares of previously-granted restricted stock to satisfy the tax withholding obligations associated with a vesting of that restricted stock..

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information, as of December 31, 2014,2017, about compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued to employees, consultants or non-employee directors of our board of directors upon exercise of options, warrants or rights.  Upon the consummation of the Combination in February 2015, the vesting of substantially all of the then-outstanding awards reflected in the table below was accelerated.

 

Plan Category

 

Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights(a)

 

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and
Rights(b)

 

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))(c)

 

 

Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options, Warrants and
Rights(a)

 

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and
Rights(b)

 

Number of Securities
Remaining
Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (c)

 

Plans approved by stockholders

 

782,622

 

$

9.35

 

1,110,274

 

 

9,665,849

 

$

N/A

 

11,641,714

 

Plans not approved by stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Total

 

782,622

 

$

9.35

 

1,110,274

 

 

9,665,849

 

$

N/A

 

11,641,714

 

 


(a)         Represents options to purchase 372,152restricted stock units covering 9,665,849 shares of common stock and restricted stock units covering 356,470 shares of common stock in each case outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 under the Amended and Restated Skilled2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan of Genesis Healthcare, Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan,, or the 20072015 Plan.

(b)Represents the weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options under the 2007 Plan.         No exercise price is payable in connection with the issuance of shares covered by the restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2014.2017.

(c)          Represents the number of shares that remained available for issuance under the 20072015 Plan as of December 31, 2014.2017. As of April 18, 2015, 1,827,8109, 2018, 12,285,136 shares remained available for issuance under the 2007such Plan.

18



Table of Contents

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

The following sets forth biographical information regarding our executive officers (as defined in applicable SEC rules) as of April 8, 2015,26, 2018, other than our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hager, whose biographical information is set forth above under “Director Biographical Information.”  All of our current executive officers assumed their respective roles, as they relate to Genesis Healthcare, Inc., upon the completion of the Combination in February 2015.

 

Thomas DiVittorio, 46,49, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. DiVittorio has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofsince the Combination and he served in the same capacity for Genesis HealthCare since 2008.LLC from 2008 to 2015. He has served in various corporate finance positions since joining Genesis HealthCareLLC in 1996. Before becoming Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. DiVittorio served as Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer and was responsible for Genesis HealthCare’sLLC’s accounting policy, financial reporting and budgeting. Prior to joining Genesis HealthCare,LLC, Mr. DiVittorio was employed by KPMG, LLP. Mr. DiVittorio is a certified public accountant.

 

Robert A. (“Mike”) Reitz, 65,Paul D. Bach, 59, Chief Operating Officer — Genesis HealthCare. Mr. Bach has served as our Chief Operating Officer — Genesis Healthcare since January 1, 2017.  He previously served the company as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Reitz has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Genesis HealthCare since 2003, and in the same capacity for Genesis Healthcare, Inc. since the consummation of the Combination in February 2015. He hasMid-Atlantic/Southeast Division from 2006 through 2016.  From 1997 to 2006, Mr. Bach served in multiple operating positions since joining Genesis HealthCare in 1992. Prior to joining Genesis HealthCare, Mr. Reitz served in various positions in the long-term care field, including in day to day operations andcompany as an Administrator, Regional Director, Corporate Director of Human Resources,the Senior Vice President of Operations andthe Capital Region.  From 1984 to 1997, Mr. Bach served the company in various roles, including Regional Vice President, of AdministrationRegional Director and Product Development. Mr. Reitz has also had significant involvement in the Alzheimer’s Association of Greater Maryland, where he has served as a Board member and Chapter President.Nursing Home Administrator.

 

Michael S. Sherman, 46,49, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer.Mr. Sherman has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer of Genesis HealthCare since 2009,the Combination and he served in the same capacity for Genesis Healthcare, Inc. since the consummation of the Combination in FebruaryLLC from 2009 to 2015. Mr. Sherman previously served as Genesis HealthCare’sLLC’s Assistant General Counsel from 1997 to1999, as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, Strategic Development, from 1999 to 2004, and as Senior Vice President, Mergers and Acquisitions, from 2006 until 2009.

 

JoAnne Reifsnyder, PhD., 56, SeniorRN, FAAN, 59, Executive Vice President, Clinical Operations, and Chief Nursing Officer.Dr. Reifsnyder has served as Seniorour Executive Vice President, Clinical Operations, and Chief Nursing Officer since the Combination and she served as Senior Vice President, Clinical Operations of Genesis HealthCare sinceLLC from 2012 and as Chief Nursing Officer of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. since the consummation of the Combination in Februaryto 2015.  Prior to joining Genesis HealthCare,LLC, Dr. Reifsnyder was Senior Vice President of Care Transitions for CareKinesis and Program Director, Health Policy, at Jefferson School of Population Health, and has held numerous other administrative, clinical and academic positions spanning a 35-year career. She was formerly the President of the Board of Directors for the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, and currently serves on the Board of the Hospice Foundation of America. She is a member of the American Nurses Association, (ANA), the American Organization of Nurse Executives, (AONE), the National Gerontological Nurses Association (NGNA) and Sigma Theta Tau International, the Honor Society of Nursing. Dr. Reifsnyder completed a postdoctoral fellowship in psychosocial oncology at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, and holds a PhD in nursing from the University of Maryland, a Master’s Degree in nursing from Thomas Jefferson University, and a BSN from Holy Family College. She holds an appointment as Adjunct Assistant professor in the School of Nursing at the University of Pennsylvania.

Dan Hirschfeld, 57, Executive Vice President and President, Genesis Rehabilitation Services, Respiratory Health Services and CareerStaff Unlimited. Mr. Hirschfeld joined Genesis HealthCare Dr. Reifsnyder was inducted as a Fellow in 2005 as Senior Vice Presidentthe American Academy of Rehab Services. He has servedNursing in his current capacity of Executive Vice President and President, Genesis Rehab Services, which is one of our wholly owned subsidiaries, since 2008. Prior to joining Genesis HealthCare, Mr. Hirschfeld held senior executive positions with a variety of privately held and publicly held companies with operations throughout the United States. Mr. Hirschfeld serves on the Board of Directors for The National Association for the Support of Long Term Care (NASL), the Assisted Living Federation of America (ALFA) and Regal Bancorp Inc., and on the Board of Trustees of Harcum College.2015.

19



Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Named Executive Officers

 

This Compensation Discussion & Analysis describes our executive compensation programs for our 20142017 fiscal year Named Executive Officers, who were:

 

·                  Robert H. Fish,George V. Hager, Jr., Chief Executive Officer;

·                  Christopher N. Felfe,Thomas DiVittorio, Chief Financial Officer;

·                  Paxton Wiffler,Paul Bach, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (beginning May 2014);Officer;

·                  Roland G. Rapp,Daniel Hirschfeld, Executive Vice President Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary;President, Genesis Rehabilitation Services; and

·                  Laurie A. Thomas,JoAnne Reifsnyder, PhD, Senior Vice President Ancillary Business.Clinical Operations and Chief Nursing Officer.

 

As indicated under “Executive Officers” above, the service of each of the foregoing individuals as an executive officer of our company ended in February 2015.

The 2014 compensation decisions were made by our Compensation Committee as it existed prior to the Combination. None of the persons who were members of the Compensation Committee at that time are members of our Compensation Committee post-Combination. Unless otherwise expressly noted, this Compensation Discussion and Analysis relates to compensation decisions made for 2014 by the Compensation Committee that was in place prior to the Combination. In connection with the Combination, we entered into employment agreements with our current executive officers in February 2015. Our recently reconstituted Compensation Committee and board of directors are in the process of evaluating our executive compensation programs and may make changes to those programs for 2015, as well as from time to time thereafter.Executive Summary

 

Executive Compensation Highlights2017 Business Results and Achievements

 

AtFiscal 2017 continued to be a challenging environment for post-acute health care service providers.  We did not achieve our annual stockholder meetingbonus plan financial performance target for 2017, although we achieved our financial performance threshold for purposes of the annual bonus plan.  Our 2017 revenue was $5.4 billion and our 2017 Adjusted EBITDAR (see “2017 Executive Compensation Program in 2014, our stockholders approvedDetail — Annual Cash Bonus — 2017 Performance Objectives and Criteria” for definition) was $632.4 million, both of which were decreases from 2016.  However, in spite of the advisory vote on executive compensationchallenges that we faced in 2017, we accomplished many of our Named Executive Officers, with over 95%strategic objectives as part of shares eligible to vote on the matter being cast in favor of approval. In light of this support, and the overall facts and circumstances relating to our business at the time, the Compensation Committee did not change the overall design of our compensation programs during 2014. The Compensation Committee took a measured approach by not increasing any base salaries, bonus opportunities or target equity award values for our Named Executive Officers.

Good Governance and Best Practices

We are committed to strong governance standards for our compensation programs, as evidenced by the practices and policies listed below.transformation, including:

 

·                  Named Executive Officers were not entitled to additional severance benefits upon a change in control.Divesting 30 underperforming centers, completely exiting four non-strategic states;

·                  Our annual performance bonus program for 2014 emphasized quality carePaying down $100 million of debt; and risk mitigation by providing:

·                  for a reduction in the size of the total bonus poolReducing overhead and of each individual’s bonus opportunity following the decertification of any facility or agency, as applicable;

·the Compensation Committee with the authority to recoup performance-based compensation in the event of a material restatement of our financial statements; and

·a cap on the amount of bonus a Named Executive Officer may earn based on our achievement of certain corporate performance objectives.

·Historically, a significant component of our equity incentives granted to Named Executive Officers consisted of long-term performance-based awards.

·We have maintained meaningful stock ownership guidelines that are intended to align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and discourage excessive risk-taking.operating expenses by approximately $50 million.

 

20142017 Compensation Programand Governance Highlights

Role of the Compensation Committee

 

The Compensation Committee of our board of directors develops our executive compensation policies and determinestook the amounts and elements of compensationfollowing compensation-related actions for fiscal 2017:

·                  Approved an increase in base salaries for our Named Executive Officers. OurOfficers in June 2017;

·                  Approved the grant of time-based and performance-based restricted stock units in May, 2017 to our Named Executive OfficersOfficers. The Compensation Committee determined the amount and terms of these restricted stock units using a “hypothetical” $3.00 stock price, in order to avoid excessive dilution, as our stock price was $1.73 at the time of grant and required a 70% increase in the stock price before the first tranche of performance-based units would be eligible to vest; and

·                  Made preliminary determinations that some, but not all, of the eligibility criteria for our fiscal year 2014 are listed above.the awarding of bonuses under the 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan were achieved, and certain criteria remain under consideration.  As described below, the Compensation Committee has not, as of April 26, 2018, approved the payment of any such bonuses.

 

20These actions demonstrate the Compensation Committee’s commitment to aligning executive pay with company performance and shareholder interests.  For additional details regarding these 2017 compensation actions, please refer to the “2017 Executive Compensation Program in Detail” section below.

We believe our executive compensation program promotes good governance and operates in the best interests of our stockholders.  A summary of our compensation governance practices is as follows:



Table of Contents

We do

We do not

ü  Place heavy emphasis on variable compensation, which includes cash and equity awards that are dependent on the achievement of short-term financial and long-term stock price goals as well as individual performance goals

×    Offer compensation-related tax gross ups

ü  Use performance-related long-term compensation in the form of performance-based units subject to three stock price hurdles before they can vest

×    Have any significant perquisites or retirement programs

ü  Have stock ownership requirements for directors that reinforce alignment with stockholders

×      Allow pledging, hedging, or trading in derivatives of Genesis securities, except in limited circumstances (see “- Compensation Policies - Restrictions on Pledging and Hedging” below)

ü  Have an independent compensation consultant advising the Compensation Committee

×    Guarantee bonuses

 

In 2014,determining whether changes should be made to our executive compensation program for 2017, the Compensation Committee consistedtook into account the fact that, last year, 98% of three independent directors and one non-independent director as defined under NYSE rules. Thethe votes cast on our shareholder advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers were voted in favor of the proposal, which the Compensation Committee’s duties and responsibilities include evaluating executive, non-employee director and non-executive compensation plans, policies and programs for us and our subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee’s function is described in detail in its charter, which has been approved by our boardCommittee considered to be a strong endorsement of directors.the existing program.

 

Executive Compensation Program Framework

Compensation Philosophy & Objectives

 

We believe that compensation should reinforce businessreward performance and attract retain and reward the performance ofretain executives and employees who we believe are critical to our success. Our philosophy and approach to compensation seeks to:is grounded in the following principles:

 

·                  ProvideCompetitiveness: provide competitive total compensation opportunities that allow us to attract, retain and motivate critical executive talent;

 

·                  TiePerformance-based: tie a significant portion of executive compensation to company and individual performance via short- and long-term incentive programs and equity awards; and

 

·                  ProvideAligned with shareholders:  provide incentives, particularly equity incentives, thatwhich align our executives’ and employees’ interests with those of our stockholders, creating an ownership culture focused on building our long-term value.

 

Our general goal is to provide compensation opportunities that position the company near the 50th percentile of market over time, and targeting a mix of compensation that is balanced, with greater emphasis on variable elements, in particular equity incentives.  We monitor achievement of these strategies and our competitive posture relative to the market through the market review process described below under “— Determination“The Decision Making Process — Role of FormsBenchmarking and Amounts of Compensation — Compensation Levels and Market Competitiveness Review.Peer Groups.

 

Compensation StructureProgram Elements

 

Although the structure may vary over time, including in light of the Combination, ourOur 2017 executive compensation program has historically contained four main components:

 

·                  Base salary — fixed pay that takes into account an individual’s duties and responsibilities, experience, expertise and individual performance;

 

·                  Annual cash bonus an opportunity to receive variable cash incentive compensation designed to reward attainment of company and individual performance objectives, with target award opportunities expressed as a percentage of base salary;

 

·                  Long-term equity incentives stock-based awards, including stock options and restricted  stock units that vest in part over time and performance-vested restrictedin part based on achievement of stock that reflect the performance of our common stock,targets to align executive officer and stockholder interests and encourage executive retention during the vesting period; and

 

·                  Benefits and limited perquisites — including severance benefits, insurance benefits and certain other perquisites.

We believe that the elements of compensation identified above produce a well-balanced mix of security-oriented, retentive and at-risk compensation through base salary, benefits and perquisites and both short- and long-term performance incentives.incentives based upon company and individual performance goals. Base salary, benefits and perquisites provide our executives with a measure of security as to the minimum level of remuneration they will receive. The annual cash incentive and long-term equity incentive components are intended to motivate the executive to focus on the business metrics, individual performance and the provision of quality care that will produce a high level of value creation over the long-term. We believe that this approach not only enhances stockholder value, and long-term wealth creation for our executives, but also reduces the risk that our critical executives will leave us to pursue other opportunities with competitors or otherwise.

 

Pay Mix

The charts below show that the majority of our Named Executive Officers’ target total direct compensation (TDC), i.e. base salary, target bonuses and annual long-term equity incentives, is variable:  67% for our CEO and an average of 55% for our other Named Executive Officers.

We have historically considered the following factors when determining the allocation among current and long-term (equity) and cash and non-cash compensation each year: our short and long-term businessoperating objectives, our compensation philosophy, competitive trends within our industry, the dilutive effect of equity grants and the importance of creating a performance-based environment that ties a significant portion of each executive’s compensation to the achievement of company and individual performance targets and increasing stockholder value. When considering a proposed compensation package for an executive or key employee, we consider the compensation package as a whole, as well as each element of total compensation individually.

Determination of Forms and Amounts of Compensation

The level and mix of compensation for our Named Executive Officers is also determined based on the Compensation Committee’s understanding of compensation levels for similar positions in the industry and the marketplace at large.

 

The Decision Making Process

Role of the Compensation Consultants. Committee.  The Compensation Committee of our board of directors develops our executive compensation policies and determines the amounts and elements of compensation for our Named Executive Officers.  For most of 2017, the Compensation Committee consisted of one independent director, who served as Chair of the Compensation Committee, and three non-independent directors as defined under NYSE rules.  The Compensation Committee’s duties and responsibilities include evaluating executive and non-executive compensation plans, policies and programs for us and our subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee works closely with management and the Compensation Committee’s independent consultant to examine the effectiveness of our executive compensation program throughout the year.  The Compensation Committee’s function is described in detail in its charter, which has been approved by our board of directors.

Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage the services of independent compensation consultants to provide advice in connection with making executive compensation determinations.  In late 2012,recent years, the company has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“Pearl Meyer”) to conduct compensation reviews and provide advice, and as such, Pearl Meyer is familiar with our industry.  In 2016, the Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (“PM&P”) to conduct areview the compensation review of our then-current executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, who were with our company at that time.  PM&P delivered its reportand to provide recommendations regarding the compensation of such officers (the “2013 Report”) to the Compensation Committee in early 2013.  The 2012/2013 engagement built on previous compensation reviews and advice that PM&P had periodically provided to the Compensation Committee since 2007.  The 2013 Report was a comprehensive review of all components of our“2016 executive compensation programs.  From timereview”).  Pearl Meyer continued to time, PM&P also providesadvise the Compensation Committee with guidance regardingregards to compensation decisions made during 2017.  See “Corporate Governance — Committees of the administrationBoard of our executive compensation programs.  ConsistentDirectors — Compensation Committee”.

As necessary and when appropriate, Pearl Meyer interacted with the 2013 Report, the Compensation Committee did not significantly alter the compensation

21



Table of Contents

programs applicable to our Named Executive Officers for 2014, which largely continued the compensation programs unchanged, in both types and potential amounts of compensation, from 2013.  The Compensation Committee also consulted with PM&P from time to time later in 2013, including in conjunction with our hiring of Mr. Fish to serve as our Chief Executive Officer in late 2013 and establishing his compensation.

While conducting assignments, PM&P has historically interacted with our management when appropriate. Specifically, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary and our senior human resources personnel have interacted with PM&P to provide relevant company and executive compensation data. In addition, from time to time PM&P hasPearl Meyer sought feedback from the chairman of the Compensation Committee other members of our board of directors orand our Chief Executive Officer in connection with PM&P’sPearl Meyer’s work prior to presenting study results or recommendations to the Compensation Committee.

 

Role of Benchmarking and Peer GroupsIn the years PM&P has been retained, PM&P has provided only services directed by the Compensation Committee related to2016 executive compensation and services directed by the Corporate Governance Committee related to director compensation. PM&P has not provided any other services to us.

Market Competitiveness Review. In preparing the 2013 Report,review, Pearl Meyer analyzed competitive compensation levels were analyzed utilizing a combination of data reported for a peer group of industry competitors and compensation survey data.  The survey data augmented the peer group data in order to develop “market consensus” compensation levels for each applicable executive. Market consensus levels generally represented an equal (50%/50%) blend of peer group and survey data. The Compensation Committee historically targeted total direct compensation between the 50th and 75th percentile market levels forthat our top executives as a group, assuming company, business unit and individual performance objectives are met at target levels.

Peer Group/Market Levels. For the 2013 Report, peer group data was analyzed from public filings (i.e., peers’ proxy statements reporting on fiscal year 2011 compensation) for specific companies thatmanagement, the Compensation Committee considered appropriate comparisons for the purposes of evaluating the market competitiveness of our executive compensation. Our management and the Compensation Committee worked with PM&P to develop a list of peer companies that the Compensation CommitteePearl Meyer had determined to be appropriate to include in our peer group because they arewere similar to us in terms of industry and size. The peer group included companies with retirement/aged care, medical nursing homes, medical outpatient/home medicine, and/or physical therapy/rehabilitation center operations, with comparable market capitalizationenterprise values and revenues. The following companies comprised our peer group for purposes of the 2013 Report:2016:

 

Advocat, Inc.
Amedisys, Inc.

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

AmSurg Corp.

Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings

Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.
Capital Senior Living,

LifePoint Health, Inc.
Emeritus Corp.

Chemed Corporation

National HealthCare Corporation

The Ensign Group, Inc.

Quest Diagnostics, Inc.

Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc.

Select Medical Holdings Corporation

Five Star Quality Care, Inc.
Gentiva

Team Health Services, Inc.
LHC Group, Inc.
Lincare Holdings, Inc.
National Healthcare Corp.
Sun Healthcare Group Inc.
Sunrise Senior Living,

HealthSouth Corporation

Universal Health Services, Inc.

 

22



TableFollowing is a summary of Contents

The median market capitalizationthe enterprise values (as of our peer group was approximately $453 millionOctober 31, 2016) and revenues (trailing 12 months as of October 31, 2012. The trailing twelve month revenue of our2016) for the peer group rangedrelative to the company:

Peer Group Percentile

 

Enterprise
Value
(in millions)

 

Revenue
(in millions)

 

25th percentile

 

$

2,168

 

$

1,589

 

50th percentile

 

$

5,383

 

$

4,238

 

75th percentile

 

$

7,385

 

$

6,583

 

Genesis Healthcare, Inc.

 

$

5,221

 

$

5,657

 

Pearl Meyer obtained data from approximately $298 million to approximately $2.7 billion, with the median revenuepublic filings of the peer group being approximately $1.4 billion. Ourcompanies for the purposes of evaluating the market capitalization was approximately $307 million, and our trailing twelve month revenue was approximately $868 million, as of October 31, 2012.  Additionally, two other companies, Kindred Healthcare, Inc. and Select Medical Corp., were considered for comparisons to certain featurescompetitiveness of our annual incentive and long-term incentive programs, as well as equity share utilization and ownership.  Those two companies are in our industry, but are considerably larger than we are, and therefore including them for comparison purposes was deemed useful and appropriate for some portions of the review but not for others.executive compensation.

 

As discussed above, compensation survey data augmented theIn addition to peer group data, in ordersix published or private compensation surveys were also utilized by Pearl Meyer, and comparisons to develop “market consensus” compensation levels for each applicable executive.

The survey databenchmark positions were made based on five surveys, including the following two published compensation surveys, plus two private survey sourcescompany’s size. Pearl Meyer completed its review in December 2016 and presented its analysis of the company’s executive compensation data from companies across all industries,program relative to peer and an additional private survey source of manager25th, 50th and executive compensation in hospitals and health systems:

·Towers Watson — 2012 Top Management Compensation (all industries); and

·Mercer — 2011 Integrated Health Network Compensation (hospital/facility system).

PM&P matched our executive officer positions to survey data for75th percentile levels. Overall, the comparable positionscompany’s target TDC was approximately at organizations whose revenue level was similar to ours.  Equal weighting was given to the general and healthcare industry survey sources.

The25th percentile market levels based on the results of the 2013 competitive review indicated that total target direct compensation — base salaries, annual target performance-based bonuses and the annual value of long-term incentive/equity awards — for our Named Executive Officers as a group (all five positions combined) was close to the 50th percentile market level. In addition, the 2013 Report indicated that, in the aggregate but with some variation by position, our executive officers’:

·Base salaries were at approximately the 50th percentile market level;

·Actual bonuses for 2011 (the most recent year then available) fell between the market 50th and 75th percentile market level;

·Target bonuses approximated the market 75th percentile for actual bonuses, but their target bonus percentages were generally aligned with market 50th percentile target bonuses;

·Actual cash compensation was approximately 6% above the market 50th percentile;

·Target total cash compensation was approximately 12% below the market 75th percentile actual total cash compensation;

·Long-term incentive award values for 2012 were approximately 21% below the market 50th percentile;

·Actual total direct compensation was approximately 7% below the market 50th percentile; and

·Target total direct compensation is at approximately the market 50th percentile.study.

 

In making its Named Executive Officer compensation decisions, for 2014, the Compensation Committee considered the information contained inpeer group analysis and the 2013 Report. Consistent with 2013,factors discussed below under “- Role of Management.”

Role of Management. At the request of the Compensation Committee, did not significantly alter the compensation programs applicable to our Named Executive Officers from the programs that were previously established by the Compensation Committee.  Salaries and target bonus levels for the Named Executive Officers were not changed from 2013.

Management Involvement. The Compensation Committee has from time to time requested certain of our senior executives, including our Chief Executive Officer to bewas present at Compensation Committee meetings in 2017 where executive compensation and company, business unit and individual performance arewere discussed and evaluated.  Executives may provide insight, suggestions or recommendations regarding executive compensation if present during these meetings or at other times. However, only Compensation Committee members vote on decisions made regarding executive compensation and in some instances only the independent members of the Compensation Committee vote on applicable matters. Compensation decisions for all the Named Executive Officers are made by the Compensation Committee.

To supplement their deliberations and analysis regarding executive compensation, the Compensation Committee from time to time requests that our Chief Executive Officer provideprovided recommendations orand input to the Compensation Committee regarding other Named Executive Officers’ compensation, based on his evaluations of the other Named Executive Officers’ performance relative to their individual performance objectives established under our annual performance bonus program and in consideration of other past achievements and other subjective factors.    As part of the Compensation Committee’s discussions with our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee considered the following factors in making its compensation decisions:

·                    the competitive environment for executives of both public and private companies in our industry,

·                    the compensation paid to our officers in prior years to help ensure consistency from year to year,

·                    our acquisitions over the past few years and the integration efforts required to consolidate those acquisitions,

·                    the difficult operating conditions during the current economic climate and the resultant reductions in reimbursements,

·                    the amount of dilution resulting from equity awards;

·                    retention risks, and

·                    the performance of the executive officers.

The Compensation Committee will from time to time requestsrequest that the Chief Executive Officer provide a self-assessment of his performance as well.

23



Table  The Chief Executive Officer does not participate in the deliberations of Contentsthe Compensation Committee regarding his own compensation.

 

2014 Named2017 Executive Officer Compensation Program in Detail

 

TotalOur 2017 executive compensation for our Named Executive Officers consists ofprogram contained four main components: base salary, annual cash performance bonus, long-term equity incentives and equity awards.benefits and limited perquisites.

 

Base Salary

 

Base salary levels and any adjustments to those levels for each individual Named Executive Officer are reviewed each year by the Compensation Committee, and may be based on factors such as our overall performance, new roles and/or responsibilities assumed by the Named Executive Officer, the performance of the Named Executive Officer’s area of responsibility, the Named Executive Officer’s impact on strategic goals, the length of service with us, whether our employees in general have recently received wage increases, orand whether there have been revisions to our compensation philosophy. However, no specific weighting is applied to any one factor and the process ultimately relies on the subjective judgment of the Compensation Committee. The results of the 2016 executive compensation review indicated that base salaries for each of the Named Executive Officers were generally between the 25th and 50th percentiles of market levels.  In June 2017, the Compensation Committee determined that increases to not increase the base salaries of our Named Executive Officers in 2014, other than for Ms. Thomas, whose base salary was increased from $340,000 to $375,000 in lightwere warranted as a result of the Compensation Committee’s further assessmentcompany’s performance in spite of the significantly increased roleschallenging environment and responsibilities that she assumed in connection with a promotion she received in late 2013,given our competitive positioning and forthe lack of increases over the past several years.  The Compensation Committee approved increases of approximately 9% to Mr. Felfe, whose base salary was increased from $340,000Hager, 22% to $375,000 when his Chief Financial Officer role was no longer “interim.”  The salary amount reflected in the table for Mr. Wiffler, who joined our company in May 2014, is an annualized amount.DiVittorio, 24% to Mr. Bach, 18% to Mr. Hirschfeld and 16% to Ms. Reifsnyder.

 

Name

 

2014 Base Salary

 

Robert H. Fish

 

$

700,000

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

$

500,000

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

$

375,000

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

$

400,000

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

$

375,000

 

The table below sets forth the annual base salaries for Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2017.

Name

Base Salary ($)

George V. Hager, Jr.

900,016

Thomas DiVittorio

525,000

Paul Bach

525,000

Daniel Hirschfeld

525,000

JoAnne Reifsnyder

425,000

 

Annual PerformanceCash Bonus Program

 

We believe that annual performance-based cash bonuses play an important role in providing incentives to our executives to achieve near-term performance goals. Our Named Executive Officers arewere and remain eligible to receive cash bonuses based upon the achievement of certain company and individual objectives under our Annual Performance Bonus Program, or Performance Program. 2017 Incentive Compensation Plan (“2017 ICP”).

The Compensation Committee determines a target bonus as a percent of base salary fordetermined the Named Executive Officers.

In the first quarter of 2014, the Compensation Committee established a detailed set of company and individual performance objectives applicable to eachthe executive officers for the year,2017 based, in part, on company and individual objectives established as part of the annual operating plan process. With respect to executive level new hires and mid-year promotions, the Compensation Committee has historically established a similar set of individual performance objectives in connection with their hire or promotion (if applicable). The Compensation Committee works with the Chief Executive Officer to develop finalthe performance goals that are tied to our annual budget planning process and set at levels the Compensation Committee believes are challenging, but reasonable, for management to achieve. AtIn the end of eachsubsequent year, the Compensation Committee determines the level of achievement for each performance goal, and determines the resulting bonus levels. Actual bonuses are approved by thelevels, after receipt of audited financial statements and any other applicable information. The Compensation Committee also determines if and typicallywhen any bonuses shall be paid to the executives, depending upon the availability of cash to pay any such bonuses, and other issues at the Compensation Committee’s discretion. In addition, the Committee has the discretion to pay bonuses in cash and/or other forms of consideration, including restricted stock units or other forms of equity.

For 2017, the first quarterCompensation Committee  modified the structure of the subsequent fiscal year.ICP, including:

·                  Making payouts for the “individual goals” portion of the bonus independent of achieving the Adjusted EBITDAR threshold; and

·                  Implementing a pro-rata payout schedule for “stretch” performance achievement, i.e. performance above the Adjusted EBITDAR target.

 

20142017 Target Bonus Opportunities

In the first quarter of 2014,March 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the Performance Program2017 ICP.  Pursuant to the decision-making process described herein, the Compensation Committee established target cash bonuses for calendar year 2014.each of the Named Executive Officers that were generally around the 25th percentile of market, with the exception of Mr. Hager, who was between the 25th and 50th percentiles.  The table setbelow sets forth below showsthe target bonus opportunities as a percentage of each Named Executive Officer’s base salary.  Ofsalary in the applicable target bonus percentage, 50% (or, in Ms. Thomas’ case, 20%) was based onevent that the achievement of consolidated company financialachieved its targeted performance objectives for fiscal 2017 and the remaining portion was basedrespective officer achieved his or her individual goals.  In the event that the company attained at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its targeted Adjusted EBITDAR for fiscal 2017 (the “EBITDAR Target” discussed below), then the Compensation Committee could approve bonuses on the achievement of individual objectives, which included financiala pro-rated basis, starting at 25% payout for 90% attainment and other operational, quality and compliance objectives relatedincreasing to the particular participant’s area of oversight. For Mr. Wiffler, who commenced employment with our company on May 8, 2014, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement his bonus payment, if any, for 2014 would be prorated downward by 1/3 to reflect that he joined our company after roughly 1/3 of the year had elapsed.

24



Table of Contents

Name

Target Bonus
Opportunity
(% of
Base Salary)

Robert H. Fish

100

%

Paxton Wiffler

75

%

Christopher N. Felfe

60

%

Roland G. Rapp

60

%

Laurie A. Thomas

50

%

2014 Performance Objectives and Criteria

The performance objectives under our 2014 Performance Program were established for the following three major areas:

·2014 consolidated adjusted earnings per diluted share, or adjusted EPS (in90% payout at 99% attainment.   In addition, Ms. Thomas was eligible to receive a bonus based on our rehabilitation therapy segment achieving a specified adjusted EBITDA target in 2013);

·working capital as measured by free cash flow (or, in the case of Ms. Thomas, days sales outstanding, or DSO, targets individualized for her areas of responsibility); and

·individual objectives that were tailored to each executive’s role, as noted above.

Additionally, in order for any of the Named Executive Officers to bewere eligible for a total bonus of up to 60% (100% for 2014,Mr. Hager) of their respective base salaries in the event that the company was required to meet or exceed an adjusted EBITDA targetexceeded the achievement of 90% of our budgeted consolidated EBITDA for the year.EBITDAR Target.

 

Adjusted EPS. Given the emphasis that stockholders place on earnings per share, or EPS, and the potential effect EPS performance may have on our stockholder value, the Compensation Committee utilized an adjusted EPS measure as the performance criteria for determining a portion of the 2014 cash bonuses for our Named Executive Officers as illustrated by the table below. We define adjusted EPS as net income/loss (determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP) per diluted share, adjusted for gains/losses on asset sales, discontinued operations, provision for income taxes and other items that we believe are not indicative of our underlying business performance. For 2014, adjusted EPS included adjustments for organization restructuring costs, exit costs related to divested facilities, legal expenses for non-routine matters, losses at a skilled nursing facility not at full operation, governmental investigation expense, impairment of long-lived assets, debt modification/retirement costs and Combination-related expenses.

Adjusted EBITDA (Laurie Thomas). For Ms. Thomas, an adjusted EBITDA measure of performance for our rehabilitation therapy segment and for our hospice and home health segment was selected as additional performance criteria because the Compensation Committee determined it to be a relevant indicator of the operational achievements of those segments, which were key focuses of Ms. Thomas’ position. We define EBITDA as net income/loss (determined in accordance with GAAP) before depreciation, amortization, interest expense (net of interest income) and provisions for income taxes, and adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA adjusted for discontinued operations, gains/losses on asset sales, changes in accounting principle, debt retirement costs and other items that we believe are not indicative of our underlying business performance, including those referenced above.

Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS are non-GAAP measures. For a reconciliation of these measures to their GAAP counterparts, see Item 6 (Selected Financial Data) of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 20, 2015 (in the case of adjusted EBITDA) and the reconciliation tables in our earnings release for the quarter ended December 31, 2015, furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to our Current Report filed on Form 8-K on February 20, 2015 (in the case of adjusted EPS, also referred to as adjusted net income per diluted share).

Working Capital. The working capital target for the Named Executive Officers, other than Ms. Thomas, was a function of a target free cash flow amount established by the Compensation Committee. For Ms. Thomas, the working capital target was a function of days sales outstanding, or DSO, targets individualized for our rehabilitation therapy segment and hospice and home health segment. The working capital targets for each executive could be characterized as “attainable,” meaning that based on historical performance, although attainment of this performance level is uncertain, it could reasonably be anticipated that target performance would be achieved.

25



Table of Contents

2014 Total Bonus Potential

 

 

Bonus Opportunity as Percentage of Base Salary

 

Name

 

Threshold Bonus
Opportunity
(% of
Base Salary)

 

Target Bonus
Opportunity
(% of
Base Salary)

 

Maximum Bonus
Opportunity
With Stretch (%
of Base Salary)

 

George V. Hager, Jr.

 

25

%

100

%

100

%

Thomas DiVittorio

 

10

%

40

%

60

%

Paul Bach

 

10

%

40

%

60

%

Daniel Hirschfeld

 

10

%

40

%

60

%

JoAnne Reifsnyder

 

10

%

40

%

60

%

 

The table below outlines each performance objective andsets forth the potential cash bonus that could be awarded for the attainment ofto each objective for 2014.

 

 

Potential Bonus Based on
2014 Adjusted EPS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Threshold
($0.25)
(1)

 

Target
($0.31)
(1)

 

Stretch
For
Each
$0.01
over
Target
(2)

 

Potential
Bonus for
Achieving
Segment
Performance
Target

 

Potential
Bonus for
Achieving
Working
Capital
Target

 

Potential
Bonus for
Achieving
Individual
Objectives
(3)

 

Target Bonus
Potential
(4)

 

Robert H. Fish

 

$

87,500

 

$

350,000

 

$

17,500

 

n/a

 

$

35,000

 

$

315,000

 

$

700,000

 

Paxton Wiffler(5)

 

$

46,875

 

$

187,500

 

$

9,375

 

n/a

 

$

18,750

 

$

168,750

 

$

375,000

 

Christopher N. Felfe(6)

 

$

28,125

 

$

112,500

 

$

5,625

 

n/a

 

$

11,250

 

$

101,250

 

$

225,000

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

$

30,000

 

$

120,000

 

$

6,000

 

$

n/a

 

$

12,000

 

$

108,000

 

$

240,000

 

Laurie A. Thomas(6)

 

$

9,375

 

$

37,500

 

$

1,875

 

$

56,250

(7)

$

18,750

 

$

75,000

 

$

187,500

 


(1)The threshold 2014 adjusted EPS of $0.25 was required to be met in order to be eligible for the cash bonus for the adjusted EPS performance metric. In the event the 2014 adjusted EPS was greater than $0.25, the amount of cash bonus for the adjusted EPS component would be interpolated for adjusted EPS between $0.25 and $0.31.

(2)The Compensation Committee determined that for every $0.01 of adjusted EPS in excess of $0.31 (the 2014 Performance Program adjusted EPS target), up to a maximum adjusted EPS of $0.51, the executive would be awarded a “stretch bonus” that is above the target adjusted EPS bonus potential provided above.

(3)The Compensation Committee established individual objectives, tailored to gauge the operational performance of each executive in their respective role, as well as quality and compliance objectives intended to manage risks related to the particular participant’s area of oversight. The executive was required to accomplish each of these objectives, as determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, to be eligible to receive the full amount of this portion of the cash bonus. The Compensation Committee also had sole discretion to award a partial amount of the bonus related to the achievement of the individual objectives if the executive achieved some, but not all, of the objectives.

(4)Represents the amount that would be earned for achieving the target adjusted EPS for 2014, achieving the applicable working capital targets, achievement of all individual objectives, and, in Ms. Thomas’s case, achieving the rehabilitation therapy segment and hospice and home health adjusted EBITDA performance targets.  Does not reflect or represent any assumption that a “stretch” bonus with respect to 2014 adjusted EPS or 2014 segment EBITDA, as applicable, would be earned.

(5)For Mr. Wiffler, who commenced employment with our company on May 8, 2014, pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement his bonus payment, if any, for 2014 would be prorated downward by 1/3 to reflect that he joined our company after roughly 1/3 of the year had elapsed.

(6)As noted above under “—2014 Named Executive Officer Compensation—Base Salary,” Mr. Felfe’s and Ms. Thomas’ base salaries were each increased during 2014 to $375,000.  Whileunder the structures of their respective bonus plans were not changed in connection with their salary increases, their salary increases effectively increased their potential bonus payouts because the potential payouts are a function of their base salaries.  The information for Mr. Felfe and Ms. Thomas in this table reflects their respective potential bonus payouts on a post-increase basis.  Their bonuses were not prorated to give effect to the mid-year salary increases.

(7)Under the 2014 Performance Program, Ms. Thomas was entitled to receive a bonus of $14,063 if the adjusted EBITDA of our rehabilitation therapy segment was at least 90.0% of the segment’s budgeted EBITDA for 2014. She was also entitled to receive a bonus of $14,063 if the adjusted EBITDA of our hospice and home health segment was at least 90.0% of the segment’s budgeted EBITDA.  Furthermore, if the respective segment’s adjusted EBITDA for 2014 was 100% of budget, then the respective bonus for that segment would be $28,125. Ms. Thomas’ rehabilitation therapy segment adjusted EBITDA-based threshold and target bonus amount could be characterized as “attainable,” meaning that based on historical performance, although attainment of the performance level was uncertain, it could reasonably be anticipated that target performance would be achieved. Her hospice and home-health segment adjusted EBITDA-based threshold and target bonus amount could be characterized as being less likely to be attained.  Furthermore, amounts in excess of 100% of budget for the respective segments were considered less likely to be attained, but still reasonable, and in consideration thereof the Compensation Committee imposed a cap (at 115.0% of budget) on Ms. Thomas’ respective segment adjusted EBITDA-based bonus component.2017 ICP.

 

 

 

Amount of Potential Bonus

 

Name

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

George V. Hager, Jr.

 

$

225,004

 

$

900,016

 

$

900,016

 

Thomas DiVittorio

 

$

52,500

 

$

210,000

 

$

315,000

 

Paul Bach

 

$

52,500

 

$

210,000

 

$

315,000

 

Daniel Hirschfeld

 

$

52,500

 

$

210,000

 

$

315,000

 

JoAnne Reifsnyder

 

$

42,500

 

$

170,000

 

$

255,000

 

The following table briefly outlines the individual performance objectives established for

2017 Performance Objectives and Criteria.  For each of the Named Executive Officers, for 2014. The Compensation Committee may take into account these and any other factors it deems appropriate in determining the executives’75% of his or her target bonus payoutswas based on the company’s achievement of consolidated Adjusted EBITDAR of $701.0 million during fiscal 2017 (the “EBITDAR Target”).  The remaining 25% of the target bonus was based on the achievement of individual performance. The Compensation Committee does not attempt togoals, which goals included among others increasing the company’s liquidity position and increasing the 5-star ratings for the company’s centers.

 

26



TableAdjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP measure and is defined as net income or loss before depreciation and amortization expense, interest expense, lease expense, loss (or gain) on extinguishment of Contentsdebt, other (income) loss, transaction costs, long-lived asset impairment, income tax expense (or benefit) and loss from discontinued operations, as adjusted for (i) the conversion to cash basis leases, (ii) newly acquired or constructed businesses with start-up losses and (iii) other adjustments to provide a supplemental valuation measure.

 

quantify, rank or assign relative weight to the various individual objectives for a Named Executive Officer and no individual objective was material to the Compensation Committee’s bonus decision.

Name

Individual Performance Objectives

Robert H. Fish

(1) Fill key roles and develop management team; (2) Develop and obtain board approval of new strategic direction; (3) Evaluate and take action with respect to underperforming assets; (4) Coordinate revised strategy to mitigate legal and regulatory risks; and (5) Attend to quality and compliance initiatives in area(s) of responsibility.

Paxton Wiffler

(1) Drive operating efficiencies; (2) Optimize capital spending; (3) Improve communications with applicable governmental authorities; (4) Develop and strengthen operational management team; and (5) Attend to quality and compliance initiatives in area(s) of responsibility.

Christopher N. Felfe

(1) Continue HUD financing efforts; (2) Execute on appropriate refinancing and working capital management; (3) Ensure compliance with debt covenants; (4) Lead information technology department restructuring, including hiring of new Chief Information Officer; (5) Evaluate cost structure and implement appropriate cost reduction strategies; (6) Develop and strengthen direct reports; and (7) Attend to quality and compliance initiatives in area(s) of responsibility.

Roland G. Rapp

(1) Ensure that we operate ethically and in compliance with SEC requirements; (2) Direct compliance with SEC and NYSE filing requirements; (3) Collaborate with Chief Executive Officer to coordinate management of significant legal and regulatory matters; (4)  Manage legal aspects of acquisitions and divestitures efficiently and effectively; (5) Resolve lawsuits at prudent levels and with efficient utilization of insurance programs and without adverse effects on participation in healthcare programs; and (6) Attend to quality and compliance initiatives in area(s) of responsibility.

Laurie A. Thomas

(1) Work with Chief Executive Officer to evaluate strategic opportunities for areas of responsibility; (2) Fill key roles and develop management team; (3) Complete rollout of point of service handheld technology for rehabilitation therapy segment; (4) Drive effectiveness in hospice operations; (5) Coordinate with legal and compliance departments to manage risk; and (6) Attend to quality and compliance initiatives in area(s) of responsibility.

The 2014 Performance Program, continuing policies previously adopted in 2009, included the following features designed to link pay to performance and, in the case of (iii) and (iv) below, link incentive compensation opportunities to quality services and minimize incentives to engage in excessive risk-taking behavior:

(i)

the adjusted EPS “stretch bonus” portion of the program provides for an additional bonus for every $0.01 that adjusted EPS exceeds the targeted adjusted EPS of $0.25, which was intended to result in a stretch bonus (if applicable) that more closely correlates to a percentage of overall target bonus rather than a percentage of salary;

(ii)

the bonus payouts were capped in the event adjusted EPS exceeded $0.51;

(iii)

a 25% reduction of the adjusted EPS bonus component in the event of any involuntary decertification of an affiliated nursing facility and/or hospice/home health agency, as applicable; and

(iv)

includes a bonus clawback provision with respect to the adjusted EPS and adjusted EBITDA components, as applicable, in the event of a material restatement of our financial statements, pursuant to which the Compensation Committee could seek reimbursement on an after-tax basis of any portion of performance-based compensation paid or awarded to designated executives that is greater than what would have been paid or awarded if calculated based on the restated financial results.

27



Table of Contents

Analysis of 20142017 Performance Period.

In January 2015,March 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed our 20142017 performance and determinedmade preliminary determinations that our consolidated adjusted EBITDA exceeded the 90%we achieved 90.2% of our budgeted consolidated EBITDAEBITDAR Target for the year, which was aexceeded the threshold requirement for the Named Executive Officers being eligible to receive bonuses,bonuses; and that our 2014 adjusted EPS was $0.40, which exceeded the target amount of $0.31 as set forth in the 2014 Performance Program. The Compensation Committee determined that the working capital targets for each applicable Named Executive Officer were met. The Compensation Committee also determined that the maximum stretch bonus related to the rehabilitation therapy segment’s adjusted EBITDA had been achieved, but that the threshold target related to the hospice and home health segment’s adjusted EBITDA had not been achieved. The Compensation Committee also reviewed the performance of each individual against his or her individual performance objectives, including with respect to the applicable quality and compliance initiatives, and approved bonus amounts related thereto after determining that those objectives were satisfied.

The following table summarizes the 2014 bonus amounts for each of the Named Executive Officers, based on these determinations:

 

 

Actual Bonus Based on Adjusted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPS

 

Actual Bonus

 

Actual

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 

Target ($0.31)

 

Additional
“Stretch” Bonus
For Exceeding
Target

 

for
Segment
Performance
Targets

 

Bonus for
Working 
Capital 
Target

 

Actual
Bonus for
Individual
Objectives

 

Actual Total
2014 Bonus

 

Robert H. Fish

 

$

350,000

 

$

157,500

 

n/a

 

$

35,000

 

$

315,000

 

$

857,500

 

Paxton Wiffler(1)

 

$

125,000

 

$

56,250

 

n/a

 

$

12,500

 

$

112,500

 

$

306,250

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

$

112,500

 

$

50,625

 

n/a

 

$

11,250

 

$

101,250

 

$

275,625

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

$

120,000

 

$

54,000

 

n/a

 

$

12,000

 

$

108,000

 

$

294,000

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

$

37,500

 

$

16,875

 

$

56,250

 

$

 

$

75,000

 

$

210,625

(2)


(1)The amounts shownother than Mr. Hirschfeld, had achieved their individual goals.  However, certain additional criteria, such as the availability of cash to pay any bonuses, the form (cash or equity) and timing of any bonuses, remain under consideration as of April 26, 2018.  As a result, the Compensation Committee has not yet made a final determination regarding incentive bonuses pursuant to the 2017 ICP, provided, however, that Mr. Hirschfeld is not eligible for Mr. Wiffler are prorated amounts, reflecting that he received a prorated 2014 bonus due to commencing employment with our company in May 2014.

(2)In light of her efforts with respect tohis resignation from the hospice and home health segment in 2014, in January 2015 the Compensation Committee granted an additional $25,000 discretionary bonus to Ms. Thomas.company.

2015 Annual Performance Bonus ProgramLong Term Equity Incentives

In light of the Combination and related management changes and reconstitution of the board of directors, the Compensation Committee is considering the Performance Program to be adopted for 2015.

Equity Awards

 

We believe that an ownership culture in our company is important to provide our Named Executive Officers with long-term incentives to build value for our stockholders. We believe stock-based awards create such a culture and help to align the interests of our management and employees with the interests of our stockholders, and also provide a retention benefit to us as a result of their vesting features.

 

We have historically (including in 2014) granted equityEquity Grant Procedures. The Compensation Committee awards through our 2007 Plan, which was adopted by our boardrestricted stock units pursuant to the terms of directorsthe company’s Amended and stockholders to permit the grant of stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance awards to our officers, non-employee directors, employees and consultants. Future awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan. However, if our stockholders approve our newRestated 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Equity Plan”), as further described below under “Proposal 3: Approval of. The Compensation Committee administers the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan and establishes the provisions for all awards granted after the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders willthereunder, including targeted grant values, vesting schedules and other provisions.  We expect to grant awards to executive officers on an annual basis.  Awards may also be granted under the 2015 Plan.to executive officers and eligible employees upon hire, promotion and on an ad hoc basis when deemed appropriate. The Compensation Committee approves all equity awards.

 

20142017 Equity Award Program.  ProgramConsistent with our prior practice,In May 2017, the 2014 annualCompensation Committee approved the 2017 equity incentive awards thatgrants for each Named Executive Officer.  The Compensation Committee established a target equity award value for each of the Named Executive Officers based upon a percentage of the person’s base salary, and the targeted amounts were grantedgenerally around the 25th percentile of market levels.

The Committee determined the number of shares to be awarded to the Named Executive Officers were madeby using a “value” approach whereby the amount of the particular equity awards were determined based on a dollar value at the time of grant.  In March 2014, the Compensation Committee approved

28



Table of Contents

the target equity grant valuesaward amount was divided by $3.00, which was approximately 70% higher than the actual price per share of $1.73 at that time.  The Committee determined that the higher stock price, which resulted in a substantially lower number of shares awarded, would be more appropriate to use for 2014 for each Named Executive Officer (excluding Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler) based upon its assessment of the respective executive’s overall compensation level, the level of equity awards previously grantedthese purposes in order to the executive, and the industry data provided by PM&P in the 2013 Report.  Mr. Fish was not granted an equity award in 2014 because he had previously been granted an equity award at the time of his hiring in November 2013.  Mr. Wiffler was granted an equity award in May 2014 in connection with his hiring.avoid excessive dilution.  The table below reflects the amount of equity awards, which were made in the form of restricted stock units that were granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2014.

The target equity award value for the equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officers besides Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler was allocated equally between restricted stock with a combination of performance- and time-based vesting criteria, and restricted shares with only time-based vesting criteria.2017.  The vesting and other terms of the awards are described in more detail below.   Mr. Fish’s 2013 equity

Named Executive Officer

 

Target
Value of
Awards ($)

 

Number of
Units
Granted(1)

 

% Apportioned to
Performance-
Based Awards

 

% Apportioned to
Time-Based
Awards

 

George V. Hager, Jr.

 

900,000

 

300,000

 

50

%

50

%

Thomas DiVittorio

 

446,250

 

148,750

 

50

%

50

%

Paul Bach

 

446,250

 

148,750

 

50

%

50

%

Daniel Hirschfeld

 

446,250

 

148,750

 

50

%

50

%

JoAnne Reifsnyder

 

318,750

 

106,250

 

50

%

50

%


(1)         The number of units was calculated by dividing the target value by $3.00 per share.  At the time of award, grant, which is also described below,the stock price was negotiated with him and granted in connection with his hiring as our Chief Executive Officer in November 2013.  Mr. Wiffler’s 2014 equity award grant, which is also described below, was negotiated with him and granted in connection with his hiring as our Chief Operating Officer in May 2014.  $1.73 per share.

The vesting and other terms of the aforementioned awardsrestricted stock units were granted to Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler are different than the awards that were made to the other Named Executive Officers in March 2014.

Named Executive Officer

 

Target 2014
Equity Award
Value

 

Number of Shares
Granted

 

% Apportioned to
Performance-Based
Awards

 

% Apportioned to
Time-Based Awards

 

Robert H. Fish

 

 

 

 

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

 

400,000

 

100

%

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

$

300,000

 

61,350

 

50

%

50

%

Roland G. Rapp

 

$

400,000

 

81,800

 

50

%

50

%

Laurie A. Thomas

 

$

400,000

 

81,800

 

50

%

50

%

on May 30, 2017.  50% of such units were performance-based units and 50% were time-based units.  The performance-based restricted stock granted in March 2014 to Mr. Felfe, Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas providedunits provide that theone-third of such shares would vest,will cliff-vest, if at all, on May 30, 2020 if and when, within the three year period following the date of grant, the company’s stock trading price on the New York Stock Exchange closedNYSE closes at or above $7.50 per shareeach of the thresholds of $3.00, $3.75 and $4.00 for 30 consecutive trading days or if withinprior to May 30, 2020.  Importantly, any units that three-year periodhave not met the company consummated a merger or sale in which the value ascribed to the company’s common stock was at or above $7.50 per share.price thresholds for vesting by May 30, 2020 will be forfeited.  The time-based restricted stock units granted to those individuals in March 2014 providedon May 30, 2017 provide that the shares wouldwill vest ratably over a four yearthree-year period from the date of grant, with 25%one-third vesting on each anniversary of the grant date, generally subject to the grantee’s continued service to the company.

The grants were intended to tie a portion of the grantee’s compensation to our financial performance, align the interests of the grantee and our stockholders generally, and provide a meaningful retention incentive to the grantee.  In January 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that the 30-day closing stock price criteria had been satisfied with respect to the performance-based awards granted to Mr. Felfe, Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas in March 2014, and those awards therefore vested in full.  The time-based awards granted to Mr. Felfe, Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas in March 2014 vested in full upon the closing of the Combination in February 2015, in accordance with the terms of the 2007 Plan and the related award agreements.

 

As referenced above, in connection with his hiring as our Chief Executive Officer and as negotiated in his employment agreement, in November 2013, Mr. Fish was granted an award of 800,000 shares of restricted stock.  The award was subject to both time-based and performance-based vesting requirements.  The performance-based component would be satisfied in cumulative installments with respect to one-third of the shares subject to the award in the event that the company attained per share stock price targets of $7.50, $10.00 and $12.50, respectively, for thirty consecutive trading days during the four-year period commencing on the grant date. If the first stock price target was attained during the four year period, then one-third of the shares would vest, subject to Mr. Fish’s continued service, on the date on which the Compensation Committee certified that the target had been attained. If the second or third stock price target was attained during the four year period, then the one-third installment of shares subject to the applicable stock price target would vest with respect to 50% of that installment on the date on which the Compensation Committee certified attainment of the target and 50% of that installment would vest on the first anniversary of the certification date, in each case subject to Mr. Fish’s continued service.

If Mr. Fish’s service were to be terminated due to his death or disability, then his November 2013 restricted stock award would remain, for the one-year period or six-month period, respectively (but in no event beyond the last day of the performance period), following the termination date, outstanding and eligible to vest upon the attainment of the applicable performance goals (or upon a change in control, as described below). If Mr. Fish’s service were to be terminated due to his death or disability, by the company without cause or by Mr. Fish for good reason, then any shares that only remained subject to time-vesting requirements would accelerate and vest. In the event of a “change in control” (as defined in the award agreement, which is filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014) during the four-year period from the date of grant, then (i) the first third of the award would accelerate and vest (if it hadn’t already vested due to the criteria noted above) immediately

29



Table of Contents

prior to the change in control, (ii) the second third of the award would accelerate and vest in full (if it hadn’t already vested due to the criteria noted above) if the per share transaction price was at least $10.00, and would accelerate and vest on a straight-line pro rata interpolation basis if the per share transaction price was between $7.50 and $10.00, and (iii) the last third of the award would accelerate and vest in full (if it hadn’t already vested due to the criteria noted above) if the per share transaction price was at least $12.50, and would accelerate and vest on a straight-line pro rata interpolation basis if the per share transaction price was between $10.00 and $12.50.

In May 2014, upon his commencement of employment with us, Mr. Wiffler received an award of 400,000 shares of restricted stock.  The terms of Mr. Wiffler’s stock grant were essentially the same as the terms of Mr. Fish’s grant described above, except that the performance period applicable to Mr. Wiffler’s stock grant was three years (as opposed to four years for Mr. Fish’s award), and Mr. Wiffler’s award did not include a provision accelerating vesting upon Mr. Wiffler terminating his employment for “good reason.”  A copy of Mr. Wiffler’s award agreement is filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-K for fiscal year 2014.

The Compensation Committee, pursuant to its authority under the 2007 Plan and in light of the pending closing of the Combination, accelerated to December 2014 the vesting of the first third of the respective aforementioned awards granted to Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler.  In light of the Combination constituting a “change of control” for purposes of the 2007 Plan and related award agreements, 44.5% of the second third of the aforementioned awards to Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler (i.e., 118,684 shares for Mr. Fish and 59,342 shares for Mr. Wiffler) also accelerated upon the closing of the Combination in February 2015.  Upon the completion of the Combination in February 2015, Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler’s employment with the company was terminated, and as a result the remaining unvested portions of their respective restricted stock awards were terminated.

2015 Equity Award Program.  In light of the Combination and related management changes and reconstitution of the board of directors, the Compensation Committee will be changing the Performance Program for 2015. If our stockholders approve our 2015 Plan, we will issue restricted stock unit awards which will vest, as they relate to grants to our executive officers and certain other employees, based on achievement of stock price performance conditions and passage of time and, with respect to certain other non-executive employees, solely based on passage of time.

Equity Grant Procedures. Executives and employees have historically been eligible to receive long-term equity awards pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Plan, which was approved by our stockholders in 2008 and subsequently further amended and restated (with stockholder approval) in 2011 and again in 2013. The Compensation Committee administers the 2007 Plan and establishes the provisions for all awards granted thereunder, including targeted grant values, vesting schedules and other provisions.

Grants to executives and eligible employees have generally been made upon hire, promotion and annually. The Compensation Committee determines and approves all equity awards, which have generally been granted on the second business day following our first quarterly earnings release following the grant approval. The exercise price of any stock option grants that have been made have been set at 100% of the closing market price of a share of our Class A common stock on the date of grant.

In light of the Combination and related management changes and reconstitution of the board of directors, the Compensation Committee is considering whether to continue or modify our equity grant procedures for grants that it may approve in the future.

Benefits and Limited Perquisites

 

The Named Executive Officers have historically beenare eligible to participate in our benefit plans on the same terms as other employees. We also provide other benefits toemployees, including our Named Executive Officers that are intended to be part401(k) program. In addition, we paid the premiums on a $3.0 million whole life insurance policy on behalf of a competitive overall compensation program. For 2014, these included:Mr. Hager and reimbursed certain continuing education expenses of Dr. Reifsnyder.

 

·Annual executive physical examinations;

·Four weeks paid vacation; and

·Payment of term life insurance premiums.

In addition, the Named Executive Officers have been eligible to participate in our 401(k) program, but historically have been unable to make contributions due to qualified plan limitations.  Beginning in 2013, we shifted 100% of responsibility for the employee portion of the premium payments for our health plans to the Named Executive Officers, should they elect to participate in the plans.  That policy continued in 2014. During 2014, we continued to pay the employer portion of the healthcare plan premiums.

Severance and Related Benefits

 

Each of our Named Executive Officers hadhas an employment agreement with us that providedprovides for severance payments if the executive’s employment wasis terminated by us without cause or if we declineddecline to extend the executive’s employment term. The

30



Tableseverance benefits are an essential element of Contents

In connectionour employment agreements with the Combination, our Compensation Committee modified the severance arrangements with our Named Executive Officers asand are intended to assist us in recruiting and retaining talented executives. The amount of severance benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers is described below. below in more detail under the heading “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Each of the Named Executive Officers is generally subject to certain non-compete and non-solicitation obligations following the termination of his or her employment, as provided in his or her respective employment agreement. The post-termination duration of the applicablesuch non-compete and non-solicitation obligations varies by individual, but ranges from six monthsone to two years.  The vesting of awards of restricted stock and optionsunits granted under our long-term performance program prior to the CombinationNamed Executive Officers accelerates in full or in part depending on the particular award, upon a change in control or death or disability of a Named Executive Officer.  In addition,The Chief Executive Officer of the awards would have continued to vest for an additional six months or year, depending on the particular award, in the event of disability. The Compensation Committee hadcompany has discretion over the vesting of a portion of these awards in the event of a termination without cause, a voluntary resignation or retirement. All unvested awards are immediately forfeited upon a termination for cause. These severance benefits were determined at the time of our initial public offering, their hiring, or their promotion to an executive officer position, whichever was later.  The severance benefits were an essential element of our employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers, and remain so with respect to our current executive officers, and are intended to assist us in recruiting and retaining talented executives. However, in November 2014, in connection with the Combination the Compensation Committee adopted a retention and enhanced severance program that applied to the Named Executive Officers, among other employees, which is discussed below under “— Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control—Combination Retention and Separation Program.”

 

Compensation Policies

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

StockThe company does not have stock ownership guidelines for the Named Executive Officers were established in 2007.its executive officers.  The Named Executive Officers had five years from July 24, 2007 (or their date of hire/promotion, if later) to accumulate and retain minimum value in common stock shares, equivalent to a multiple of each executive’s base salary, as outlined below.  All of our Named Executive Officers were in compliance with the guidelines in 2014.

Named Executive Officer

Position

Multiple of Base Salary

Robert H. Fish

Chief Executive Officer

5 times

Paxton Wiffler

Chief Operating Officer

4 times

Christopher N. Felfe

Chief Financial Officer

3 times

Roland G. Rapp

Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

3 times

Laurie A. Thomas

President, Ancillary Business

3 times

In March 2015, the board of directorscompany has adopted a stock ownership policy requiring our non-employee directors to ownhold at least three (3) times their annual retainer60,000 shares of company stock within three (3) years of joining the board.

Stock ownership guidelines for independent directors established in 2007 were in place prior to the adoption of the March 2015 stock ownership policy. Under the prior guidelines, independent directors were required to accumulate (and thereafter retain) at least three (3) times their annual retainer within three (3) years of joining our board. For purposesboard of determining stock ownership under such guidelines, ownership shares were made up of all forms of common stock (including unvested restricted stock awards, unvested restricted stock units and unvested performance-based restricted stock). Ownership shares did not include vested or unvested stock options. All of our directors who served in 2014 were in compliance with these guidelines.directors.

 

Restrictions on Pledging and Hedging

The company has adopted a policy that prohibits directors and executive officers from pledging shares of company securities as collateral, although upon request the company will allow pledges of company securities to non-margin accounts in limited situations.  The company’s policies also prohibit directors and executive officers from entering into hedging transactions involving company securities.

Impact of Tax and Accounting

 

As a general matter, the Compensation Committee takes into account the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation vehicles employed by us.

When determining amounts of long-term incentive grants to executives and employees, the Compensation Committee examines the accounting cost associated with the grants. Under Financial Accounting Standard Boards Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” or “FASB ASC Topic 718,” grants of restricted stock awards and stock options result in a recognition of a compensation expense, which is taken into account in determining the mix of equity grants to be made to Named Executive Officers.

 

Prior to the passage of the 2017 federal tax legislation, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the “Code,” does not permitgenerally prohibited publicly-traded companies to takefrom taking income tax deductions for compensation paid to the Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer and any of the three most highly paid executive officers, other than the Chief Financial Officer,chief financial officer, to the extent that annual compensation exceedsexceeded $1 million in any taxable year and does not otherwise qualify asunless it qualified for an exception, including one for certain performance-based compensation.  Our 2007 PlanWhile that performance-based compensation exception generally has been repealed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, because of the way that the employment of executive officers of the company is structured following the Combination, we believe that the compensation paid to allow us to pay

31



Table of Contents

performance-based compensation not subject to the $1 million limitation. In addition, our Performance Program and structured long-term equity performance program have been designed and have generally been implemented with the intent to meet the performance-based criteria of Section 162(m) of the Code.

The Compensation Committee intends to maximize tax effectiveness of our executive incentive plans, and will continue to consider steps that might be in our best interests to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code. However, in establishing the cash and equity incentive compensation programs for the Named Executive Officers the Compensation Committee believes that the potential deductibility of the compensation payable under those programs should be only one of a number of relevant factors taken into consideration, andis not the sole or primary factor. The Compensation Committee believes that cash and equity incentive compensation must be maintained at the requisite levelcurrently subject to attract and retain the executive officers essential to our financial success, even if all or part of that compensation may not be deductible by reason of the limitations of Section 162(m) in any event.

Recoupment (“Clawback”) Policy

In September 2017, the company adopted a “clawback” policy providing generally that, where the company’s financial statements contain a material error that was the result of fraud, gross negligence or intentional misconduct by a current or former executive officer, the company will require the executive to repay to the company the amount of certain incentive compensation granted after adoption of the Code.policy and paid during the three years preceding the triggering event to the extent the payment was in excess of the amount that would have been paid had the financial statement error not occurred.

Compensation Committee Report

 

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis above with our management. Based on the review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

 

Submitted by:

David ReisJohn F. DePodesta (Chair)

 

John F. DePodestaJames V. McKeon

 

Robert H. FishDavid Reis

 

Arnold Whitman

 

Members of the Compensation Committee

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to our Named Executive Officers by us or our subsidiaries during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, 2016 and 2012.2015.

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Stock
Awards
(1)

 

Option

Awards
(1)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(2)

 

All Other
Compensation
(3)

 

Total

 

Robert H. Fish

 

2014

 

$

700,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

857,500

 

$

7,379

 

$

1,564,879

 

Chief Executive Officer (commencing November 2013)

 

2013

 

$

61,923

 

$

2,296,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,357,293

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

2014

 

$

311,538

 

$

1,960,000

 

$

 

$

306,250

 

$

7,592

 

$

2,585,380

 

Chief Operating Officer (commencing May 2014)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

2014

 

$

363,462

 

$

300,002

 

$

 

$

275,625

 

$

6,816

 

$

945,905

 

Chief Financial Officer (commencing July 2013)

 

2013

 

$

284,615

 

$

139,999

 

$

 

$

45,251

 

$

6,496

 

$

476,361

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

2014

 

$

400,000

 

$

400,002

 

$

 

$

294,000

 

$

7,834

 

$

1,101,836

 

Executive Vice President,

 

2013

 

$

400,000

 

$

400,000

 

$

 

$

120,000

 

$

6,527

 

$

926,527

 

General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Secretary

 

2012

 

$

400,000

 

$

299,997

 

$

100,000

 

$

76,000

 

$

6,738

 

$

882,735

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

2014

 

$

372,308

 

$

400,002

 

$

 

$

210,625

 

$

7,761

 

$

990,696

 

President, Ancillary Business (commencing September 2013)

 

2013

 

$

303,500

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

120,700

 

$

6,690

 

$

630,890

 

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Stock
Awards
(1)($)

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)

 

All Other
Compensation
($)

 

Total
($)

 

George V. Hager, Jr.

 

2017

 

888,908

 

429,000

 

(2)

41,604

(3)

1,359,512

 

Chief Executive Officer (commencing

 

2016

 

822,263

 

324,500

 

 

15,375

 

1,162,138

 

February 2, 2015)

 

2015

 

756,670

 

540,705

 

 

15,375

 

1,312,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas DiVittorio

 

2017

 

514,230

 

212,713

 

(2)

 

726,943

 

Chief Financial Officer (commencing

 

2016

 

429,998

 

143,960

 

 

 

573,958

 

February 2, 2015)

 

2015

 

386,712

 

244,035

 

 

 

630,747

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paul Bach

 

2017

 

510,908

 

212,713

 

(2)

 

723,621

 

Executive Vice President and Chief

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Officer (commencing January 1, 2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daniel Hirschfeld

 

2017

 

515,526

 

212,713

 

 

 

728,239

 

Executive Vice President and President

 

2016

 

444,327

 

148,680

 

 

 

593,007

 

Genesis Rehabilitation Services

 

2015

 

407,730

 

220,110

 

 

 

627,840

 

(commencing February 2, 2015)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JoAnne Reifsnyder

 

2017

 

424,040

 

151,937

 

(2)

 

575,977

 

Executive Vice President Clinical

 

2016

 

364,998

 

108,560

 

 

42,763

 

473,558

 

Operations and Chief Nursing Officer

 

2015

 

329,327

 

181,830

 

 

 

511,157

 

(commencing February 2, 2015)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)               The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the respective stock and optionequity awards granted in the year indicated, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value of the performance-vested restricted stock awardsunits granted in February 2014 for the 2014-2017 performance period2016 is based on the probable outcome of the performance criteria calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. If performance had been assumed at the maximum level of attainment, the amounts reported would have been: Mr. Hager, $519,000; Mr. DiVittorio, $257,337; Mr. Bach, $257,337; Mr. Hirschfeld, $257,337; and Ms. Reifsnyder, $183,812. For a discussion of the valuation assumptions for the 20142017 awards, see Footnote 12, “Stock-Based Compensation”14, Stock-Based Compensation, to our 20142017 consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017. For additional information regarding equity awards granted in 2014,2017, including a description of the vesting terms of the performance-vested restricted stock, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Awards.”

32



Table of Contents

 

(2)               The amounts shown represent the performance-based bonus awards earned under our Performance Programs for the applicable year. For a more complete description of the Performance Programs seeAs explained above (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Annual Performance Bonus Program.”Cash Bonus”), no non-equity incentive compensation plan amounts have been paid or are currently payable to such Named Executive Officers, but payment may be made to them in the future in amounts determined by the Compensation Committee.

 

(3)               The amounts shown consistConsists of our cost forpremiums paid by the provision to the Named Executive Officerscompany on a $3.0 million whole life insurance policy on behalf of life/accidental death and dismemberment (AD&D) insurance premiums, and other benefits, which for 2014 were as follows:Mr. Hager.

Name

 

Life/AD&D
Insurance

 

Other*

 

Robert H. Fish

 

$

804

 

$

6,575

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

$

241

 

$

7,351

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

$

241

 

$

6,575

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

$

483

 

$

7,351

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

$

410

 

$

7,351

 


* For 2014, includes amounts for the employer portion of health and disability insurance premiums.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2014.2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

 

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of

 

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of

 

Exercise
or Base

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-

 

Under Equity Incentive Plan

 

Shares of

 

Securities

 

Price of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

Awards(2)

 

Stock or

 

Underlying

 

Option

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold
($)

 

Target
($)

 

Maximum
($)

 

Threshold
(#)

 

Target
(#)

 

Maximum
(#)

 

Units
(#)(2)

 

Options
(#)

 

Awards
($/Sh)

 

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Approval
Date
(3)

 

Performance Cash Bonus Program

 

Performance Based
Restricted Stock

 

Time Based
Restricted
Stock

 

Stock Options

 

and Option
Awards
($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert H. Fish

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

$

437,500

 

$

700,000

 

$

1,050,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

5/8/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,960,000

(4)

 

 

5/8/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

$

234,375

 

$

375,000

 

$

562,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

30,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

144,786

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

30,675

 

 

 

$

144,786

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

$

140,625

 

$

225,000

 

$

337,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

40,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

193,048

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,900

 

 

 

$

193,048

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

$

150,000

 

$

240,000

 

$

360,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

40,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

193,048

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,900

 

 

 

$

193,048

(4)

 

 

3/24/2014

 

3/24/2014

 

$

131,251

 

$

187,500

 

$

281,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-

 

Estimated Future
Payouts
Under Equity

 

All Other
Stock Awards:
Number
of Shares

 

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

Incentive Plan

 

of Stock

 

And Option

 

 

 

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Awards(2)

 

or Units(3)

 

Awards

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

($)

 

($)

 

($)

 

(#)

 

(#)

 

($)(4)

 

Mr. Hager

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

150,000

 

 

169,500

 

 

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

 

150,000

 

259,500

 

 

 

3/7/2017

 

225,004

 

900,016

 

900,016

 

 

 

 

Mr. DiVittorio

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

 

84,044

 

 

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

128,669

 

 

 

3/7/2017

 

52,500

 

210,000

 

315,000

 

 

 

 

Mr.  Bach

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

 

84,044

 

 

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

128,669

 

 

 

3/7/2017

 

52,500

 

210,000

 

315,000

 

 

 

 

 

Mr. Hirschfeld

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

 

84,044

 

 

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

 

74,375

 

128,669

 

 

 

3/7/2017

 

52,500

 

210,000

 

315,000

 

 

 

 

 

Ms. Reifsnyder

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

53,125

 

 

60,031

 

 

 

5/30/2017

 

 

 

 

 

53,125

 

91.906

 

 

 

3/7/2017

 

42,500

 

170,000

 

255,000

 

 

 

 

 


(1)         The amounts shown representThese columns address the potential value of performance cash bonuses under our 2014 Performance Program based on achievement of the following pre-established performance measures and targets: (a) 2014 consolidated adjusted earnings per share (EPS) threshold of $0.25, target of $0.31, and maximum of $0.51; (b) 2014 working capital objective, as measured by free cash flow, or days sales outstanding targets individualized for the applicable Named Executive Officer’s areas of responsibility; and (c) individual performance objectives tailored to each Named Executive Officer’s role. For 2014, we established targetannual cash bonus opportunities, which are expressed as a percentage of base salary, of 100% for Mr. Fish, 75% for Mr. Wiffler, 60% for each of Messrs. Felfe and Rapp, and 50% for Ms. Thomas. Mr. Felfe and Ms. Thomas each received base salary increases to $375,000 per year in 2014, and their Performance Program participation amounts were based on that annualized base salary amount.

The threshold and target amounts shown in the table above are based on achievement of each Named Executive Officer’s threshold

33



Table of Contents

and target objectives, respectively. The maximum amount shown is based on an additional 1% of base salary payable for every $0.01 of incremental adjusted EPS growth above the target amount, up to a maximum of $0.51 adjusted EPS.

Additionally, Ms. Thomas was entitled to receive a bonus of $14,063 if the adjusted EBITDA of our rehabilitation therapy segment was at least 90.0% of the segment’s budgeted EBITDA for 2014. She was also entitled to receive a bonus of $14,063 if the adjusted EBITDA of our hospice and home health segment was at least 90.0% of the segment’s budgeted EBITDA. Furthermore, if the respective segment’s adjusted EBITDA for 2014 was 100% of budget, then the respective bonus for that segment would be $28,125. The bonus amount for each respective segment would be prorated if the respective segment’s adjusted EBITDA for 2014 was between 90.0% and 100.0%, and for each 1.0% that the respective segment’s adjusted EBITDA exceeded 100% of budget (up to a maximum of 115.0%), if any, Ms. Thomas would receive an additional $1,875 “stretch” bonus (for an aggregate maximum bonus based on the respective segment’s adjusted EBITDA of $56,250).  The amounts set forth in the threshold, target and maximum columns for Ms. Thomas above reflect the assumptions that she would earn the threshold, target and maximum amounts available, respectively, for these components of her bonus program.

See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation - Annual Performance Bonus Programs”Cash Bonus” for a more complete description of the 2014 Performance Program2017 ICP and the  actual 20142017 bonus payouts to the Named Executive Officers.payouts.

 

(2)         The executives, other than Mr. Fish, were granted restricted stock under our 2007 Plan in 2014. The grants of restricted stock reflected inThis column addresses the tableequity awards that are performance-vested restricted stock, other than one of the March 24, 2014 grants to each of Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas for 40,900 shares, and to Mr. Felfe for 30,675 shares, which were time-vested restricted stock.performance-based.  See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation - Long Term Equity Awards — 2014 Equity Awards”Incentives” for a more information on the vesting of these awards.

 

(3)         ReflectsThis column addresses the dateequity awards that are solely time-based.  See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - 2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation - Long Term Equity Incentives” for more information on which the grants were approved by the Compensation Committee.vesting of these awards.

 

(4)With respect to the restricted stock, reflects the grant date fair value calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. With respect to performance-vested restricted stock, we assumed that the performance criteria would be achieved.         The actual value, if any that an executive may realize upon the vesting of the applicable stock depends on the stock price on the date of vesting. There is no assurance that the value realized by an executive will be at or near the grant date fair value, or that the particular awards wouldwill actually vest either in whole or in part.  However, in connection with the Combination, all or a portion of each of the awards granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2014 vested.  See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Awards — 2014 Equity Awards” for more information.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our Named Executive Officers at December 31, 2014.2017.

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Exercisable(#)

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
Unexercisable
(#)

 

Option
Exercise
Price
($/Option)

 

Option
Expiration
Date

 

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)

 

Market
Value of
Shares or

Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)

 

Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)

 

Market or Payout
Value of
Unearned Shares,

Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested ($)

 

Name

 

Stock Options

 

Time-Based
Restricted Stock

 

Performance-Based Restricted Stock

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert H. Fish

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

533,334

(1)

$

4,570,672

(1)

Paxton Wiffler

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

266,667

(1)

$

2,285,336

(1)

Christopher N. Felfe

 

5,000

(2)

 

$

15.50

 

5/14/2017

 

30,675

(4)

$

262,885

(4)

3,895

(5)

$

33,380

(5)

 

 

3,664

(3)

3,662

(3)

$

6.74

 

2/15/2022

 

 

 

30,675

(6)

$

262,885

(6)

Roland G. Rapp

 

27,704

(7)

 

$

10.04

 

2/13/2019

 

40,900

(4)

$

350,513

(4)

11,128

(5)

$

95,367

(5)

 

 

124,870

(8)

 

$

5.91

 

2/11/2020

 

 

 

40,900

(6)

$

350,513

(6)

 

 

11,343

(9)

3,780

(9)

$

12.87

 

2/16/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,466

(3)

10,465

(3)

$

6.74

 

2/15/2022

 

 

 

 

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

2,617

(3)

2,616

(3)

$

6.74

 

2/15/2022

 

1,942

(10)

$

16,643

(10)

2,782

(5)

$

23,842

(5)

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,164

(11)

$

138,525

(11)

40,900

(6)

$

350,513

(6)

 

 

 

 

 

 

40,900

(4)

$

350,513

(4)

 

 

34



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Incentive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Market

 

Equity Incentive

 

Plan Awards;

 

 

 

 

 

Number of

 

Value of

 

Plan Awards;

 

Market or Payout

 

 

 

 

 

Shares or

 

Shares or

 

Number of

 

Value of

 

 

 

 

 

Units of

 

Units of

 

Unearned Shares,

 

Unearned Shares,

 

 

 

 

 

Stock That

 

Stock That

 

Units or Other

 

Units or Other

 

 

 

 

 

Have Not

 

Have Not

 

Rights That Have

 

Rights That Have

 

 

 

 

 

Vested (#)(1)(2)

 

Vested ($)

 

Not Vested(#)(3)(2)

 

Not Vested ($)

 

 

 

 

 

Time Based

 

Performance Based

 

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Mr. Hager

 

5/30/2017

 

150,000

 

114,000

 

150,000

 

114,000

 

 

 

6/8/2016

 

91,666

 

69,666

 

137,500

 

104,500

 

 

 

6/3/2015

 

18,834

 

14,314

 

56,500

 

42,940

 

Mr. DiVittorio

 

5/30/2017

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

 

 

6/8/2016

 

40,666

 

30,906

 

61,000

 

46,360

 

 

 

6/3/2015

 

8,500

 

6,460

 

25,500

 

19,380

 

Mr. Bach

 

5/30/2017

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

 

 

6/8/2016

 

35,350

 

2,683

 

53,024

 

40,298

 

 

 

6/3/2015

 

7,333

 

5,573

 

22,000

 

16,720

 

Mr. Hirschfeld

 

5/30/2017

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

74,375

 

56,525

 

 

 

6/8/2016

 

42,000

 

31,920

 

63,000

 

47,880

 

 

 

6/3/2015

 

7,666

 

5,826

 

23,000

 

17,480

 

Ms. Reifsnyder

 

5/30/2017

 

53,125

 

40,375

 

53,125

 

40,375

 

 

 

6/8/2016

 

30,666

 

23,306

 

46,000

 

34,960

 

 

 

6/3/2015

 

6,333

 

4,813

 

19,000

 

14,440

 

 


(1)         Consists of time-based restricted stock units that vest ratably over a three-year period from the date of grant, with one-third vesting on each anniversary of the grant date, subject to the grantee’s continued service to the company.

(2)         The number of shares shown in this column reflects the maximum number of shares of performance-vested restricted stock that could vest after December 31, 2014,2017 if the applicable performance criterion isvesting criteria are met.  The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57,$0.76, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock ExchangeNYSE on December 31, 201429, 2017 (the last business day of the year). These awards were granted

(3)         Consists of performance-based restricted stock units that vest at a rate of 33%, if at all, three years after the date of grant if prior to Messrs. Fish and Wiffler upon their commencement of employment, and their vesting is subject to performance criteria. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Equity Awards — 2014 Equity Award Program” for a description of these awards. The vesting of a portion of this award was accelerated uponsuch date the consummation ofcompany’s stock trading price on the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(2)       The option vested and became exercisable in four equal installments, subject to continued service, onNYSE closes at or above each of three specified thresholds for 30 consecutive days within the three year period following the date of grant.  The specified thresholds are $3.00, $3.75 and $4.00 for the May 14, 2007, 2008, 200930, 2017 awards, $3.60, $4.50 and 2010.

(3)       The option vests$4.80 for the June 8, 2016 awards and was to become exercisable in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on each of February 15, 2013, 2014,$8.70, $11.00 and $12.00 for the June 3, 2015 and 2016.  The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(4)       The shares reflected are the unvested portion of a March 24, 2015 grant of 30,675 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Felfe (40,900 shares in the case of Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas) that was to vest in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on March 24, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018. The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2014 (the last business day of the year). The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(5)       The shares reflected are the unvested portion of the 2012-2015 performance-vested restricted stock award of 15,579 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Felfe (44,510 shares in the case of Mr. Rapp and 11,218 in the case of Ms. Thomas) granted in 2012 that would vest if the applicable performance criterion were met, subject to continued service.  The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2014 (the last business day of the year). The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(6)       The shares reflected are the unvested portion of the 2014-2017 performance-vested restricted stock award of 30,675 shares of restricted stock (40,900 shares in the case of Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas) granted in 2014 that would vest if the applicable performance criterion were met, subject to continued service.  The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2014 (the last business day of the year). The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(7)       The option vested and became exercisable in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on each of February 13, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013.

(8)       The option vested and became exercisable in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on each of February 11, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014.

(9)       The option vests and becomes exercisable in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on each of February 16, 2012, 2014, 2014 and 2015. The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(10)     The shares reflected are the unvested portion of a prior grant of 7,770 shares of restricted stock that vests in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on February 16, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2014 (the last business day of the year). The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

(11)     The shares reflected are the unvested portion of a prior grant of 21,552 shares of restricted stock that vests in four equal installments, subject to continued service, on November 6, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. The corresponding value shown was calculated by multiplying the number of shares shown in the table by $8.57, the closing price of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2014 (the last business day of the year). The remaining vesting of this award was accelerated upon the consummation of the Combination on February 2, 2015.awards.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

The following table summarizes the vesting of restricted stock awardsunits for each of our Named Executive Officers for the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.  None of our Named Executive Officers held or exercised any stock options during the year ended December 31, 2014.2017.

 

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting(1)

 

Value Realized on
Vesting(2)

 

Robert H. Fish

 

266,666

 

$

2,285,327

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

133,333

 

$

1,142,664

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

11,760

 

$

80,776

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

36,543

 

$

235,039

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

12,894

 

$

83,820

 

35



Table of Contents

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting(#)

 

Value Realized on
Vesting($)(1)

 

Mr. Hager

 

64,667

 

109,852

 

Mr. DiVittorio

 

28,834

 

48,984

 

Mr. Bach

 

25,008

 

42,484

 

Mr. Hirschfeld

 

28,666

 

48,676

 

Ms. Reifsnyder

 

21,667

 

36,807

 


(1)         The reflected shares for Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler vested on December 31, 2014. Mr. Felfe’s shares vested on January 1, 2014 (3,895 shares), February 11, 2014 (1,250 shares) and December 31, 2014 (6,615 shares). Mr. Rapp’s shares vested on January 1, 2014 (11,128 shares), February 11, 2014 (8,460 shares) and December 31, 2014 (16,955 shares). Ms. Thomas’s shares vested on January 1, 2014 (2,782 shares), February 16, 2014 (1,942 shares), November 6, 2014 (5,388 shares) and December 31, 2014 (2,782 shares).

(2)The value realized was calculated by multiplying the number of shares that vested on the particulardate of vesting date by the closing market price per share of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the vesting date, which was $4.81 on January 1, 2014, $4.28 on February 11, 2014, $4.49 on February 16, 2014, $7.03 on November 6, 2014, and $8.57 on December 31, 2014.such date.

Employment Agreements

 

Employment Agreements with the Named Executive Officers

 

We entered into employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers. The following provides a description of the material terms of the employment agreements we entered into with our Named Executive Officers other than certain severance benefits that are also provided under the employment agreements and described below under “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.” The employment agreements for each of our Named Executive Officers provided for eligibility to participate in our equity plans and an annual performance-based bonus plan established by our board of directors.  In addition, we paid our Named Executive Officers’ term life insurance premiums. Copies of our employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers are filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. We also have employment agreements with our current executive officers, each of whom has served Genesis Healthcare, Inc. in their current position since the Combination was completed on February 2, 2015.  Those employment agreements are also described below.

Robert H. Fish.  Mr. Fish’s employment with us ended on February 2, 2015, in connection with the closing of the Combination. Mr. Fish’s employment agreement provided for an initial term ending on November 20, 2014, which was subject to automatic one-year renewal periods unless either we or Mr. Fish gave written notice of non-extension. Under the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Fish received an annual base salary of $700,000 and was eligible to participate in our annual performance-based bonus plan with a target bonus opportunity equal to 100% of his annual base salary (pro-rated for any partial calendar year).

In the event Mr. Fish’s employment was terminated as a result of his death or disability, Mr. Fish would have been entitled to receive a bonus representing a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year and, if his employment had been terminated due to disability, (i) a lump sum equal to the amount Mr. Fish would have received in respect of his base salary upon a termination by the company without cause, less certain disability plan benefits paid to him and (ii) a lump sum amount equal to the health insurance premium cost for Mr. Fish and his spouse and dependents for a 12-month period following his date of termination. If Mr. Fish’s employment had been terminated due to non-extension of the term by the company, Mr. Fish would have been eligible to receive a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year, as well as a lump sum amount equal to the annual base salary he would have been entitled to receive had he continued employment for a period of 12 months following the date of termination. If Mr. Fish had been terminated without “cause” by the company or if Mr. Fish had terminated his employment for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Fish would have been entitled to receive (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the then-current annual salary he would have been entitled to receive for a period of 24 months following the date of termination; (ii) a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year; and (iii) a lump sum amount equal to the health insurance premium cost for Mr. Fish and his spouse and dependents for a 12-month period following his date of termination.

Mr. Fish’s right to receive the severance payments described above was subject to his delivery of an effective general release of claims in favor of the company. His employment agreement also contained customary confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions. The company also entered into an indemnification agreement with Mr. Fish that was the same in all material respects as the indemnification agreements it had entered into with its other directors and executive officers.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, the company granted Mr. Fish 800,000 shares of the company’s restricted Class A common stock.  Details regarding vesting and other terms of the restricted stock award are provided above.

Paxton Wiffler.  Mr. Wiffler’s employment with us ended on February 2, 2015, in connection with the closing of the Combination.  Mr. Wiffler’s employment agreement provided for an initial term of two years ending on May 8, 2016, and was subject to automatic one-year renewal periods unless either the company or Mr. Wiffler gave written notice of non-extension. Mr. Wiffler received receive an annual base salary of $500,000 (annualized) and was eligible to participate in the company’s

36



Table of Contents

annual performance-based bonus plan with a target bonus opportunity equal to 75% of his annual base salary (pro-rated for any partial calendar year).

If Mr. Wiffler’s employment had been terminated as a result of his death or disability, he would have been entitled to receive a bonus representing a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year and, if his employment had been terminated due to disability, (i) a lump sum equal to the amount he would have received in respect of his base salary upon a termination by the company without cause, less certain disability plan benefits paid to him and (ii) a lump sum amount equal to the health insurance premium cost for him and his spouse and dependents for a 12-month period following his date of termination. In the event his employment had been terminated due to non-extension of the term by the company, he would have been eligible to receive a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year, as well as a lump sum amount equal to the annual base salary he would have been entitled to receive had he continued employment for a period of 12 months following the date of termination. In the event that Mr. Wiffler had been terminated without “cause” (as defined in his employment agreement) by the company, Mr. Wiffler would have been entitled to receive (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the then-current annual salary he would have been entitled to receive for a period of 24 months following the date of termination; (ii) a pro-rated portion of the bonus that he would have received had he been employed for the full year; and (iii) a lump sum amount equal to the health insurance premium cost for Mr. Wiffler and his spouse and dependents for a 12-month period following his date of termination.

Mr. Wiffler’s right to receive the severance payments described above was subject to his delivery of an effective general release of claims in favor of the company. His employment agreement also contained customary confidentiality and non-solicitation provisions. The company also entered into an indemnification agreement with Mr. Wiffler that was the same in all material respects as the indemnification agreements it has entered into with its other directors and executive officers.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, the company granted Mr. Wiffler 400,000 shares of the company’s restricted Class A common stock.  Details regarding vesting and other terms of the restricted stock award are provided above.

Christopher N. Felfe. Mr. Felfe’s employment with us ended on March 4, 2015, following the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015. Our employment agreement with Mr. Felfe appointed him as our Chief Financial Officer, and was not for a specified term. Under the agreement, Mr. Felfe’s salary was subject to review and upward adjustment by the board of directors from time to time. Mr. Felfe’s salary in 2014 was increased to $375,000 per year.

Roland G. Rapp. Mr. Rapp’s employment with us ended on March 4, 2015, following the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015. Our employment agreement with Mr. Rapp appointed him as our General Counsel, Secretary and Chief Administrative Officer and automatically extends for successive one-year periods until written notice of non-extension is given by either us or Mr. Rapp no later than 60 days prior to the expiration of the then applicable term. Under the agreement, Mr. Rapp’s salary was subject to review and upward adjustment by the board of directors from time to time. Mr. Rapp’s salary in 2014 was $400,000.

Laurie A. Thomas. The employment agreement with Ms. Thomas appointed her to serve as our President, Ancillary Business.  It was for an original term of one year, and automatically extended for successive one-year periods until written notice of non-extension was given by either us or Ms. Thomas no later than 60 days prior to the expiration of the then applicable term. Under the agreement, Ms. Thomas’ salary was subject to review and upward adjustment by the board of directors from time to time. Ms. Thomas’ salary in 2014 was increased to $375,000 per year.  Since the closing of the Combination, Ms. Thomas has entered into a new employment agreement with a subsidiary of the company, which supersedes her employment agreement that was in effect in 2014. In Ms. Thomas’ new role, she is no longer an “officer” of the company, as that term is defined in Rule 16a-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Employment Agreements with Current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

George V. Hager, Jr. On February 2, 2015, in connection with the closing of the Combination, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hager which sets forth the terms and conditions of his service with the company as its Chief Executive Officer following the closing of the Combination.  Mr. Hager’s agreement became effective as of the closing and will continue in effect for an initial term until March 31, 2020, subject to automatic renewals of additional successive one-year periods unless either party provides at least 90 days’ advance notice of non-renewal. Mr. Hager’s employment agreement provides for athat his base salary, of $810,105.72, which is currently $900,016, will be reviewed periodically and may be increased, but not decreased, in an effort to maintain Mr. Hager’s compensation level isat market as compared to other CEOs in companies of a similar size and in the same industry. Mr. Hager is eligible for a target annual bonus of 100% of his base salary. In addition, Mr. Hager will be eligible to participate in company sponsored long-term incentive plans, including equity incentive plans, on terms and conditions similar to other executive officers generally, the amount and terms of which will be set by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Hager will also be entitled to participate in any welfare benefit plans and pension, retirement, profit sharing,

37



Table of Contents

deferred compensation or savings plans sponsored by the company and will be entitled to receive perquisites generally provided to other executive officers of the company, as well as $3 million of “whole life” life insurance coverage.

 

Mr. Hager’s employment agreement provides that if his employment is terminated by the company without cause or due to disability or by Mr. Hager for good reason (each as definedshall pay severance benefits in the agreement), and he executes a mutual release of claims (if required by the company) and he continues to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, he will receive (i) the greater of (a) his base salary for the remainder of his employment term, plus the bonus amount for the previous year, or (b) two times Mr. Hager’s highest base salary from the prior three years of service plus two times his target bonus for the year of termination, in each case payable over a two-year period after termination; (ii) a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination; (iii) the continuation of certain insurance benefit plans for two years following termination; and (iv) full vesting of all equity-based awards, to the extent unvestedsituations upon his termination. In the casetermination of Mr. Hager’s death, the company will payemployment.  See below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for a lump sum equal to his base salary from the datedescription of termination to the end of his employment term and a pro rata bonus for the year of termination. Mr. Hager’s employment agreement provides that if his employment term is terminated by non- renewal by the Company or by Mr. Hager, he will receive continued base salary for one year after termination.such severance benefits.

 

Mr. Hager’s employment agreement includes a non-competition provision that states that Mr. Hager will not, subject to certain listed exceptions, compete with the company or solicit the company’s customers or employees during employment and for the two-year (one-year in the case of non-renewal of the term by the company) period following the termination of employment (provided that the non-competition restriction does not apply upon non-renewal of the term by Mr. Hager). The employment agreement also contains covenants relating to the treatment of confidential information and 2-year post-termination cooperation provisions.

 

Thomas DiVittorio, Paul Bach and JoAnne Reifsnyder.  On February 2, 2015, in connectionwe entered into an employment agreement with the closingeach of the Combination,Messrs. DiVittorio and Ms. Reifsnyder.  On March 2, 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. DiVittorio in connection with his service as our Chief Financial Officer. The employment agreement became effective asBach.  Each of the closing and will continue in effectemployment agreements provide for an initial term of two years subject to automatic renewals of additionaland will automatically renew for successive one-year periods unless either party provides at least 90 days’ advance notice of non-renewal. The employment agreements provides that Mr. DiVittorio will have the title described above and will have the duties and provide services that are customary for such positions. However, he may be assigned other duties by the Chief Executive Officer or his designee. In addition, his employment can be transferred among the company, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or any businesses operated by them. Mr. DiVittorio’s employment agreement further provides that he will receive an annual base salarysalaries for the current executives are currently $525,000 for each of $375,001.12. Mr. DiVittorio’s annualMessrs. DiVittorio and Bach and $425,000 for Ms. Reifsnyder. Their base salary was subsequently increased by the Compensation Committee to $430,000. The base salarysalaries will be reviewed periodically and may be increased, but not decreased, by the company.  In addition, Mr. DiVittorio isthey are eligible to participate in company sponsored long-term incentive plans, including equity incentive plans, on terms and conditions similar to other senior executive officers generally and at a level generally consistent with his or her position.

 

Mr. DiVittorioEach of the executives is eligible to participate in any welfare benefit plans, pension, retirement, profit sharing, deferred compensation or savings plans sponsored by the company and is entitled to receive perquisites generally provided to other senior officers of the company. HisThe employment agreement providesagreements provide that if histhe officer’s employment is terminated by the company without “cause”cause or by non-renewal or by the executives for “good reason”good reason (each as defined in the agreement), and he or she executes a mutual release of claims, he or she will be eligible to receive: (i) his average base salary over the prior two years, payable over a one-year period after termination; (ii) the average total of all of his annual bonuses earned as incentive compensation (but not any long-term incentive awards) over the most recent two years, payable over a one-year period after termination; (iii) the continuation ofreceive certain insurance benefit plans for two years following termination; and (iv) full vesting of all equity-based awards, to the extent unvested upon his termination. In the case of his deathseverance benefits, which are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or disability, the company will pay him a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination and all of his equity-based awards will fully vest, to the extent unvested upon termination.Change in Control.”

 

Mr. DiVittorio’sThe employment agreement includesagreements include a non-competition provision that states that hethe executive will not, subject to certain listed exceptions, compete with the company or solicit the company’s customers or employees during employment and for the one-year period following termination (provided that the non-competition restriction does not apply upon non-renewal of the term by Mr. DiVittorio)such officer). The agreementagreements also containscontain covenants relating to the treatment of confidential information and two-year post-termination cooperation provisions. The form of the release also contains a non-disparagement covenant.

 

Mr. Hirschfeld.  On February 2, 2015, in connection with the closing of the Combination, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr.  Hirschfeld.  Mr. Hirschfeld’s employment with us terminated on January 31, 2018, and accordingly his employment agreement is no longer in effect, though he presently remains subject to certain noncompetition, nonsolicitation, confidentiality and other covenants.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

 

OurMr. Hager’s employment agreements with each ofagreement provides that if his employment is terminated by the Named Executive Officers provided for certain severance payments and benefits. The employment agreements with the Named Executive Officers did not provide payments to the Named Executive Officers solely upon a change of control of our company. However, as discussed below under “—Combination Retention and Separation Program,” our Compensation Committee adopted certain programs designed to retain the services of our Named Executive Officers (and certain other employees) during the period leading up to the closing of the Combination and for specified transition periods thereafter.

38



Table of Contents

Payments upon Termination. Under the terms of their employment agreements, the Named Executive Officers would have received severance benefits if we terminated their employmentcompany without cause or if we did not extend theirdue to disability or by Mr. Hager for good reason (each as defined in the agreement), and he executes a mutual release of claims (if required by the company) and he continues to comply with all applicable restrictive covenants, he will receive (i) the greater of

(a) his base salary for the remainder of his employment agreement term. In addition,term, plus the bonus amount for the previous year, or (b) two times Mr. Hager’s highest base salary from the prior three years of service plus two times his target bonus for the year of termination, in each of the Named Executive Officers is subject tocase payable over a two-year non-solicitperiod after termination; (ii) a pro-rated annual bonus for the year of termination; (iii) the continuation of certain insurance benefit plans for two years following termination; and (iv) full vesting of all equity-based awards, to the extent unvested upon his termination. In the case of Mr. Hager’s death, the company will pay a lump sum equal to his base salary from the date of termination to the end of his or her employment other than Mr. Fish, who is not subject to a contractual non-compete, Mr. Felfe, whose non-compete obligation is six monthsterm and his non-solicit obligation is one year, and Ms. Thomas, whose non-compete obligation is one year and her non-solicit obligation is two years. The following table sets forth the benefits (other than pro-rata bonus, as noted below) provided in the applicable employment agreements:

Element

R. Fish

P. Wiffler

C. Felfe

R. Rapp

L. Thomas

Severance Provision Upon Termination Without Cause

Base Salary:

24 months

24 months

12 months

18 months

12 months

Benefits:

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

12 months

Severance Provision Upon Non-Extension of Employment Term by Company

Base Salary:

12 months

12 months

n/a

12 months

12 months

In addition, in the event of a qualifying termination (termination without cause or if we do not extent the applicable officer’s employment agreement term, as applicable), then any bonus amount to which the officer would have been entitled had his or her employment continued throughout the applicable bonus year would become payable, on a pro rata basis proportionate tobonus for the numberyear of days worked during the calendar year through the termination date,termination. Mr. Hager’s employment agreement provides that if and when bonuses would have otherwise been paid had the officer’s employment not terminated.

For purposes of these severance agreements: “cause” was generally defined as one of the following: (i) the executive’s failure to perform substantially his duties, (ii) the executive’s failure to carry out in any material respect any lawful and reasonable directive of our board of directors, (iii) the executive’s conviction of a felony, or, to the extent involving fraud, dishonesty, theft, embezzlement or moral turpitude, or any other crime, (iv) the executive’s violation of a material regulatory requirement relating to us that is injurious to us in any material respect, (v) the executive’s unlawful use or possession of illegal drugs on our property or while performing such executive’s duties, (vi) the executive’s breach of his employment agreement,term is terminated by non-renewal by the company or (vii) the executive’s commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation, willful misconduct, gross negligence or breach of fiduciary duty with respect to us.

by Mr. Hager, he will receive continued base salary for one year after termination. The employment agreements didagreement does not include provisions for payments upon a change in control or termination following a change in control, other than the severance benefits described above. However, as described under “Combination Retention

The employment agreements for each of Messrs. DiVittorio and Separation Program” below, our Compensation Committee provided for enhanced severance in connection withBach and Ms. Reifsnyder provide that if the Combination. The following chart summarizes the applicable severance (other than retention bonus and outplacement benefits) payable in connection with a termination in connection with the Combination; provided, however, that the items noted for Ms. Thomas were subsequently further modified when she entered into a newofficer’s employment agreement withis terminated by the company without cause or by non-renewal or by the executives for good reason (each as defined in the agreement), and he or she executes a mutual release of claims, he or she will be eligible to receive: (i) his or her average base salary over the prior two years, payable over a one-year period after termination; (ii) the closingaverage total of all of his or her annual bonuses earned as incentive compensation (but not any long-term incentive awards) over the Combination.

Element

R. Fish

P. Wiffler

C. Felfe

R. Rapp

L. Thomas

Severance Provision Upon Termination Without Cause in Connection with Combination

Base Salary:

24 months

24 months

18 months

18 months

18 months

Benefits:

24 months

24 months

24 months

24 months

24 months

Undermost recent two years, payable over a one-year period after termination; (iii) the termscontinuation of our equity incentive program, thecertain insurance benefit plans for two years following termination; and (iv) vesting of equity-based awards continues on applicable vesting date(s) provided that he or she executes a separation and release of claims agreement. In the performance-vested restricted stock accelerated immediatelycase of his or her death or disability, the company will pay him or her a pro-rata bonus for the year of termination and all of his or her equity-based awards will fully vest, to the extent unvested upon termination.  The employment agreements do not include provisions for payments upon a change in control. In addition,control or termination following a change in the event of disability, the awards will continue to vest for an additional year. The Compensation Committee has discretion to accelerate any awards upon termination without cause or resignation. Under the 2007 Plan, in the event of a “change in control” as defined in the 2007 Plan, each outstanding awardcontrol, other than sharesthe severance benefits described above.

The equity award agreements for each of restricted stock, which are subject to automatic accelerated vesting, will be assumed, or substituted for an equivalent award, by the successor corporation. If the successor corporation does notNamed Executive Officers provide for the assumption or substitution of the awards, the administrator may cause all awards to become fully exercisable prior to the consummation of the transaction

39



Table of Contents

constitutingimmediate vesting, upon a change in control. As more fully described above,control, of the vestingexecutive’s unvested time-based restricted stock units and unvested performance-based restricted stock units for which the performance targets have been achieved as of certain equity awards was acceleratedthe date of the change in connection with the Combination.control.

 

In accordance with the requirements of the rules of the SEC, the following table presents our reasonable estimate of the benefits payable to the Named Executive Officers under our employment agreements assuming that the following occurredemployee was terminated on December 31, 2014, the last business day of fiscal year 2014: (i) we terminate the executive’s2017 (other than Mr. Hirschfeld, who received no severance upon his employment without cause; (ii) we do not extend the executive’s employment agreement and (iii) a sale of the company occurs or in the event of death.

termination on January 31, 2018).   Excluded from the table below are benefits provided to all employees, such as unused accrued vacation. While we have made reasonable assumptions regarding the amounts payable, there can be no assurance that in the event of a termination of employment the Named Executive Officers (other than Mr. Hirschfeld) would receive the amounts reflected below.

 

Name

 

Trigger

 

Salary(1)

 

Continuation
of Welfare
Benefits(2)

 

Acceleration of
Equity
Awards(3)

 

Acceleration of
Equity
Options(4)

 

Total Value(5)

 

Robert H. Fish

 

Termination of Employment

 

$

1,400,000

 

$

17,266

 

 

 

$

1,417,266

 

 

 

Non-Extension of Term

 

$

700,000

 

 

 

 

$

700,000

 

 

 

Sale of the Company or Death

 

 

 

$

3,520,548

 

 

$

3,520,548

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paxton Wiffler

 

Termination of Employment

 

$

1,000,000

 

$

9,029

 

 

 

$

1,009,028

 

 

 

Non-Extension of Term

 

$

500,000

 

 

 

 

$

500,000

 

 

 

Sale of the Company or Death

 

 

 

$

1,631,728

 

 

$

1,631,728

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christopher N. Felfe

 

Termination of Employment

 

$

375,000

 

$

14,342

 

 

 

$

389,342

 

 

 

Non-Extension of Term

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

 

 

Sale of the Company or Death

 

 

 

$

559,150

 

$

6,701

 

$

565,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Roland G. Rapp

 

Termination of Employment

 

$

600,000

 

$

22,250

 

 

 

$

622,250

 

 

 

Non-Extension of Term

 

$

400,000

 

 

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

 

Sale of the Company or Death

 

 

 

$

796,393

 

$

19,151

 

$

815,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Laurie A. Thomas

 

Termination of Employment

 

$

375,000

 

$

15,828

 

 

 

$

390,828

 

 

 

Non-Extension of Term

 

$

375,000

 

 

 

 

$

375,000

 

 

 

Sale of the Company or Death

 

 

 

$

880,036

 

$

4,787

 

$

884,823

 

 

 

Involuntary Termination by Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

without Cause or by Employee for Good Reason

 

Non-Extension of Employee’s Employment Agreement

 

 

 

Cash
Severance
($)

 

Bonus
Payment
($)

 

Equity
Acceleration
($)(1)

 

Health
Benefits
($)(2)

 

Total
($)

 

Cash
Severance
($)

 

Bonus
Payment
($)

 

Equity
Acceleration
($)(1)

 

Health
Benefits
($)(2)

 

Total
($)

 

Mr. Hager

 

1,800,032

 

1,800,032

 

232,813

 

15,000

 

3,847,877

 

900,016

 

 

232,813

 

15,000

 

1,147,829

 

Mr. DiVittorio

 

477,500

 

(3)

109,344

 

15,000

 

601,844

 

477,500

 

(3)

109,344

 

15,000

 

601,844

 

Mr. Bach

 

474,250

 

(3)

102,397

 

15,000

 

591,647

 

474,250

 

(3)

102,397

 

15,000

 

591,647

 

Mr. Hirschfeld

 

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

(4

)

Ms. Reifsnyder

 

395,000

 

(3)

80,148

 

15,000

 

490,148

 

395,000

 

(3)

80,148

 

15,000

 

490,148

 

 


(1)          Represents, for Mr. Hager, the dollaraggregate value of cash severance basedhis unvested restricted stock units that accelerate upon the appropriate multipletermination of employment and, for the executive, multiplied byother Named Executive Officers, the executive’s annual base salary. Amounts do not include a pro-rated bonusaggregate value of his or her unvested restricted stock units that remain eligible for fiscal year 2014 ascontinued vesting post-termination. The value of the trigger eventrestricted stock units is assumed to occurbased on the closing price of our common stock on December 29, 2017 ($0.76), which was the last trading day of 2014 and thus the payout would be the same as if the trigger event had not occurred.2017.

(2)          Represents the estimated payments for continued medical, dental, vision, life and disability insurance coverage, each for a period of one year, after termination of employment without cause,two years, based on our current estimated costs to provide such continued coverage.

(3)          RepresentsThe payment upon termination is based upon the aggregate valueamount of bonuses paid, if any, to the acceleration of vesting ofofficer for the participant’s unvested restricted stock based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2014 ($8.57)prior two years.  As explained above (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2017 Named Executive Officer Compensation — Annual Cash Bonus”), which was the last trading day of 2014, assuming,no non-equity incentive compensation plan amounts have been paid or are currently payable to such officers for 2017, but payment may be made to them in the case of a sale of our company, thatfuture in amounts determined by the successor corporation does not provide for the assumption or substitution of the awards and that the per share value paid for common stock (or ascribed to our common stock) in the transaction was $8.57 per share. Also assumes, in the case of Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler, that no portion of their respective restricted stock awards outstanding on December 31, 2014 would have previously vested.Compensation Committee.

(4)          RepresentsMr. Hirschfeld did not receive any severance upon his resignation from the aggregate valuecompany on January 31, 2018.

CEO Pay Ratio

Set forth below is (i) the 2017 annual total compensation of Mr. Hager, our chief executive officer, (ii) the 2017 annual total compensation of our median employee, (iii) the ratio of the acceleration of vesting of the participant’s unvested in-the-money stock options based on the closing priceannual total compensation of our common stock on December 31, 2014 ($8.57), which wasCEO to the last trading day of 2014, assuming, in the case of a saleannual total compensation of our company,median employee, excluding our CEO, and (iv) the methodology that the successor corporation does not provide for the assumption or substitution of the awards, that the per share value paid for common stock (or ascribedwe used to our common stock) in the transaction was $8.57 per share, and our Compensation Committee elects to accelerate the vesting of the unvested stock options.

(5)Excludes the presently unquantifiable value to the executive of a continued right to indemnification by us and the executive’s right to continued coverage under our directors’ and officers’ liability insurance.

Combination Retention and Separation Program. In November 2014, the Compensation Committee approved retention bonuses forcalculate each of the Named Executive Officers (and a number of other employees ofabove.

CEO Annual Total Compensation (1)

 

$

1,359,512

 

Median Employee Annual Total Compensation (2)

 

$

30,511

 

CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio

 

45:1

 


(1)         The annual total compensation is the company and itsamount reported in the Summary Compensation Table above.

 

40(2)



Table         The annual total compensation of Contentsthe median employee was determined in the same manner as was used to calculate the annual total compensation of the CEO.

 

affiliates)We used the following methodology and process to determine the CEO pay ratio:

·Determined Employee Population. We began by identifying the individuals employed by our company or its consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017, including full-time, part-time, seasonal and temporary workers (approximately 65,000 employees in order to incentivize them to remain employed through the closingUnited States), but excluding our CEO and all of the Combinationemployees located outside the United States (approximately 100 employees in China).

·Identified the Median Employee and His/her Annual Compensation. We used 2017 IRS Form W-2 Box 5 amounts (Medicare wages) to identify the Median Employee in that population. We annualized compensation for permanent (full- or part-time) employees hired during a specified transition period thereafter, if applicable. The individual Named Executive Officers’ retention bonuses2017 but not for seasonal or temporary employees (regardless of when they were hired).

·Calculated CEO Pay Ratio. We then calculated our Median Employee’s annual total compensation for 2017 in an amount equalaccordance with the SEC’s executive compensation disclosure rules (the same rules used to one-twelfth of their respective 2014 targetdetermine our CEO’s annual bonus multiplied by the number of monthstotal compensation as reflected in the retention period after January 1, 2015. Summary Compensation Table above). On that basis, the 2017 annual total compensation for our CEO was $1,359,512 (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table above), and the 2017 total annual compensation for our Median Employee was $30,511. Accordingly, for purposes of this disclosure, the ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to the annual total compensation of our Median Employee for fiscal year 2017 is approximately 45 to 1.

The maximum retention period was set at six months beyond the closingapplicable SEC rules do not specify a single methodology for identification of the Combination. The Combination closed on February 2, 2015. Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler had no post-closing retention period.  Mr. Felfe and Mr. Rapp had a one-month post-closing retention period. Ms. Thomas was offered and accepted continued employment with the company post-closing, albeit in a different role, and as a result she had no post-closing retention period. The retention bonuses were to be paid in the event that the officer remained employed until the endmedian employee or calculation of the retention period or, ifCEO pay ratio, and other companies may use assumptions and methodologies in calculating their pay ratio that are different from those used by us. Accordingly, the combined company terminated the officer’s employment during the retention period due to synergy efforts, but wouldCEO pay ratio disclosed by other companies may not be paid incomparable to the event that the officer resigned before the end of the retention period. The Named Executive Officers’ 2014 target annual bonuses werecompany’s CEO pay ratio as follows: Mr. Fish—$700,000; Mr. Wiffler—$375,000; Mr. Felfe—$225,000; Mr. Rapp—$240,000; and Ms. Thomas—$187,500. As a result, the Named Executive Officers’ retention bonuses, which were paid following their termination of employment in February or March 2015, as applicable (except for Ms. Thomas, whose was paid in due course after the closing), were as follows: Mr. Fish—$58,333; Mr. Wiffler—$31,250; Mr. Felfe—$37,500; Mr. Rapp—$40,000; and Ms. Thomas—$15,625.disclosed above.

 

Furthermore, as noted above, each of the Named Executive Officers had an employment agreement with the company that provided for severance payments in certain circumstances. Although the employment agreements did not include provisions for any payments upon a change in control of the company or any enhanced severance benefits upon a termination following a change in control of the company, in November 2014, the Compensation Committee approved increased separation benefits for each of our Named Executive Officers should the respective officers not be offered continuing employment with the combined company in a comparable position, with a comparable salary and at a comparable location. The enhanced separation pay provisions were intended to facilitate the officers remaining focused on operating the business through the closing of the Combination. The following severance benefits were to be paid if the officer was not offered continuing post-closing employment in a comparable position with the combined company: (1) 24 months of base salary for Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler and 18 months of salary for Mr. Felfe, Mr. Rapp and Ms. Thomas; (2) COBRA coverage (health benefits continuation) paid by the company for 24 months; (3) outplacement assistance services through a third party vendor contracted by the company, valued at approximately $15,000; and (4) payment for four weeks of the officer’s vacation less any vacation taken by the officer in 2015. The severance and vacation payouts were to be made in a lump sum. Each officer was required to sign a customary general release of claims in order to receive the severance benefits. In addition, the applicable officers are subject to post-employment non-competition and non-solicitation covenants of the following duration: Mr. Felfe—six-month non-competition and one-year non-solicitation; Mr. Rapp—two-year non-competition and two-year non-solicitation; Ms. Thomas—one year non-competition and two-year non-solicitation; and Mr. Fish and Mr. Wiffler—two-year non-solicitation and no non-competition. The severance payments to the officers pursuant to the arrangement described above were in lieu of, and not in addition to, severance payments to the officers under their employment agreements.

Messrs. Fish, Wiffler, Felfe and Rapp were not offered continued employment with the combined company, and as a result their foregoing severance benefits were triggered. Ms. Thomas was offered continuing employment with the combined company on comparable terms, and did not receive severance benefits as a result of the Combination. The total amount of severance paid to or payable on behalf of, the applicable Named Executive Officers (i.e., taking into account the various severance components described above) as a result of the Combination and their related dismissal from service was as follows: Mr. Fish—$1,495,822; Mr. Wiffler—$1,066,307; Mr. Felfe—$643,344; and Mr. Rapp—$682,768.

Director Compensation

 

2014 Director Compensation

In 2014 and consistent with our prior practice, our directors who were also employees of our company were not separately compensated for their services as directors. As such, Mr. Fish did not receive separate compensation for services as a director during fiscal year 2014. In addition, we did not pay Robert M. Le Blanc any compensation for his service on our board and board committees because his service to us as a board member was provided as a part of the consulting service provided to us under an agreement with Onex Partners Manager LP that was then in effect.  The remaining individuals who served on our board of directors in 2014 (Michael E. Boxer, M. Bernard Puckett, Linda Rosenstock, Glen S. Schafer and Bruce A. Yarwood) were non-employee directors, and thus received the retainers, meeting fees and other compensation described below for their service on the board of directors.

Effective August 1, 2009, our board approved the following compensation for our non-employee directors, excluding Mr. Le Blanc: an annual cash retainer of $40,000, a $1,500 payment per meeting attended in person and a $500 payment for each meeting attended via teleconference, unless the meeting lasts more than two hours, in which case the compensation is $1,500. In addition, Chairpersons of our various standing board committees receive additional annual cash retainers of $15,000. Our board of directors from time to time also provides for cash compensation payable to members of ad hoc committees of the board.  In 2014 we had one such ad hoc committee, whose members included Mr. Schafer, Mr. Boxer and Mr. Le Blanc. Mr. 

41



Table of Contents

Le Blanc did not receive any additional compensation for his service on the ad hoc committee, but the board of directors approved meeting attendance compensation for Mr. Schafer and Mr. Boxer in the amounts described above for other committee service, as well as an additional $15,000 retainer paid to Mr. Boxer for his service as chair of the ad hoc committee.

In addition to cash compensation, each non-employee director, excluding Mr. Le Blanc, has received restricted stock units with a value of approximately $80,000 (as of the grant date) each year. The restricted stock units are generally granted each year after our second quarter earnings release, subject to service as a member of our board of directors at that time. The number of units subject to the award is determined by dividing the designated value of the grant by the per share stock price at close of the market on the grant date. The restricted stock units awarded vest fully on the first anniversary of the grant date. The awards are generally settled (and unrestricted shares of Class A common stock issued) upon vesting, subject to any settlement deferral election made by the grantee as permitted by applicable tax laws.

In February 2014, and in light of the fact that Mr. Schafer assumed the role of Chairman of the Board following the retirement of our prior Chief Executive Officer (and Chairman of the Board) in November 2013, our board, with input from PM&P, approved increasing Mr. Schafer’s aggregate retainer compensation to $180,000 beginning in 2014.  Of that amount, $60,000 was paid in the form of an annual cash retainer and $120,000 in value was in the form of restricted stock units.  The amounts were provided consistent with our existing non-employee director compensation policy as described above.

2015 Director Compensation

In March 2015, our board of directors, as newly-reconstituted following the completion of the Combination, adopted a new non-employee director compensation policy, effective February 2, 2015, which superseded the non-employee director compensation policy described above. Pursuant to the company’s current non-employee director compensation policy, members of our board of directors who are not employed by us or any of our subsidiaries will receive an annual cash retainer of $75,000, payable in equal quarterly installments, for their service on the board.board of directors. Additionally, the chairpersons of our Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance Committee will receive an additional $20,000 annual fee for their service in that capacity, and the other members of those respective committees will receive an annual fee of $8,000 for their service on the committees, in each case payable in equal quarterly installments. The chairperson of our Audit Committee will receive an additional $30,000 annual fee for his or her service in that capacity, and the other members of the Audit Committee will receive an annual fee of $12,000 for their service on the Audit Committee, in each case payable in equal quarterly installments. Furthermore, our Chairman of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors will receive an additional $100,000 annual fee for his or her service in that capacity. This additional fee to our Chairman of the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors will be payable in equal quarterly installments, and may be made, at the Chairman’s election, either in cash or in shares of our Class A common stock. For 2015 the Chairman has elected to receive this additional fee in cash. For future years he must make an irrevocable election with respect to the form of payment of this additional fee prior to the commencement of the applicable year. Our Lead Independent Director will also receive an annual cash fee of $10,000 for his or her service in that capacity.   Our directors who were also employees of our company were not separately compensated for their services as directors.

 

In addition to the foregoing compensation that our applicable directors will receive, under our non-employee director compensation policy adopted in March 2015,provides that each non-employee director will alsoannually receive an annual award$120,000 of restricted stock valued (basedunits on the closing priceor as of our Class A common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant) at $120,000.our annual meeting of shareholders determined using either (i) the average sale price of company common stock for the 40 trading days before the trading day before the annual meeting, or (ii) such other price as the Governance Committee shall determine.  The policy provides that the awards will be made on an annual basis on the date that our Compensation Committee grants regular annual equity awards to the company’s applicable officers and other employees. The sharesunits granted to the non-employee directors will vest in full one year from the date of grant (subject to

continued service), and the vesting of the sharesunits will accelerate in full upon the death or disability of the grantee, or upon a change in control of our company (as defined in the applicable equity incentive plan under which the awards are granted).  If our stockholders approve our 2015 Plan, we will issueIn accordance with the non-employee director compensation policy, on June 7, 2017 the company granted 52,000 restricted stock unit awardsunits to each non-employee director, which will vest in full one year fromwas calculated based on the date40 trading-day average share price of grant, subject to continued service at that time. $2.31.

Lastly, each of our non-employee directors will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred for attendance at board and committee meetings.  We do not offer our non-employee directors any perquisites or other forms of compensation for service on our board of directors.

 

Director Compensation Table

 

The following table summarizes the compensation received by our non-employee directors for their services during fiscal year 2014.2017.  As noted above, Mr. Hager, as an employee directors (i.e., Mr. Fish), and Mr. Le Blanc,director, did not receive additional compensation for theirhis service on our board of directors in 2014.  Each of the directors noted in the table below, except Mr. Schafer, resigned from our board of directors upon the closing of the Combination in February 2015.2017.

 

42



Table of Contents

Director

 

Fees Earned or
Paid In Cash(1)

 

Stock Awards(2)

 

Other
Compensation

 

Total

 

Michael E. Boxer

 

$

93,500

 

$

80,000

 

 

$

173,500

 

Robert M. Le Blanc

 

 

 

 

 

M. Bernard Puckett

 

$

70,500

 

$

80,000

 

 

$

150,500

 

Linda Rosenstock, M.D.

 

$

71,000

 

$

80,000

 

 

$

151,000

 

Glenn S. Schafer

 

$

82,500

 

$

120,003

 

 

$

202,503

 

Bruce A. Yarwood

 

$

58,000

 

$

80,000

 

 

$

138,000

 

Director

 

Fees Earned or
Paid In
Cash($)(1)

 

Stock
Awards ($)(2)

 

Other
Compensation ($)

 

Total ($)

 

James H. Bloem

 

105,000

 

82,680

 

 

187,680

 

John F. DePodesta

 

112,630

 

82,680

 

 

195,310

 

Robert H. Fish

 

157,082

 

82,680

 

 

239,762

 

Steven Fishman (3)

 

47,106

 

 

 

47,106

 

Robert Hartman

 

83,000

 

82,680

 

 

165,680

 

James V. McKeon

 

89,000

 

82,680

 

 

171,680

 

Terry Allison Rappuhn (4)

 

53,486

 

82,680

 

 

136,166

 

David Reis

 

83,000

 

82,680

 

 

165,680

 

Glenn S. Schafer (5)

 

42,321

 

 

 

42,321

 

Arnold Whitman

 

83,000

 

82,680

 

 

165,680

 

 


(1)         Represents fees paid to directors for their service on theour board of directors and its committees as described above.

(2)         The amounts shown represent the aggregate grant date fair value of all stock awards granted in 2014,2017, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, which for each non-employee director consisted of an award of 13,24552,000 restricted stock units (19,868 restricted stock units for Mr. Schafer) granted on August 13, 2014June 7, 2017 (based on the closingaverage sale price of our Class Acompany common stock of $6.04 on that date).for the 40 trading days before the trading day before the annual meeting. Each restricted stock unit represents the contingent right to receive one share of our Class A common stock. The restricted stock units would, pursuant to their terms, typically vest in full on August 13, 2015. However, as a resultJune 7, 2018.  As of December 31, 2017, each of the Combination, the vesting of thedirectors who was then serving held 52,000 unvested restricted stock units and no other than those granted tounvested equity compensation awards.

(3)         Mr. Schafer (because he continues to serve onFishman resigned from our board of directors after the closing of the Combination) accelerated and the units were settled upon the closing of the Combination.on April 7, 2017.

 

The members of our board of directors also are entitled(4)         Ms. Rappuhn was elected to reimbursement of their expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings and conferences with our senior management.  We do not offer our non-employee directors and any perquisites or other forms of compensation for servicethe Board on our board of directors.June, 7, 2017.

 

The following table sets forth the number of unvested restricted stock units held by each of our non-employee directors(5)         Mr. Schaefer’s term as of December 31, 2014. None of our non-employee directors held any stock options or other unvested awards as of December 31, 2014.a director expired on June 6, 2017.

 

Name

Unvested Restricted Stock Units Outstanding
at 12/31/14 (# of units)

Michael E. Boxer

13,245

Robert M. Le Blanc

M. Bernard Puckett

13,245

Linda Rosenstock, M.D.

13,245

Glenn S. Schafer

19,868

Bruce A Yarwood

13,245

Compensation Risk Assessment

 

In 2014,2017, our Compensation Committee and management reviewed the design and operation of our compensation programs. The review included an assessment of the level of risk associated with our executive compensation program as well as incentive plans at other levels of the organization. As part of this review, and assessment, the Compensation Committee identified the following features among others, that workof our compensation programs which serve to avoid, discourage, or mitigate excessive or unnecessary risk taking:

 

·                  OurWe believe that we have an appropriate mix of pay philosophy targets compensation at market competitive levelselements, well-balanced between fixed and emphasizes performance-based awards;

variable, and short- and long-term elements;

·                  The elements of our compensation programs (base pay, short-termWe intend base salaries to be sufficient to discourage undue risk-taking to meet incentive and long-term incentives) are balanced.

goals;

·                  The timing ofOur incentive award payouts and/or vesting is generally linked to future performance.

·Incentive plans utilizeand equity awards use a diversified set of financial, nonfinancial (including quality of care) and non-financialindividual performance metrics that are measured at combinationsa combination of organizational and individual levels.

organization levels;

·                  Long-term incentive awards provide a mix of equity vehicles, including stock options, performance-vesting restricted stock and time-vesting restricted stock, whichIncentive plan goals are all subjectintended to multi-year vesting schedules.

create long-term value for stockholders;

·                  Individual awards under our performance incentive plansFinancial goals and opportunities are cappedset at specified maximum levels.

levels that are attainable without taking inappropriate risks;

·                  Incentive opportunities are capped so that upside potential does not encourage detrimental risk-taking;

·                  Incentive plans define a range of performance over which payouts may be earned, including at levels below target, rather than an “all-or-nothing” approach;

·                  Long-term incentive (equity) awards include both performance-based and time-vested restricted stock units, which are vested or earned over a multi-year period;

·                  Different performance measures are used in the short- and long-term incentive plans (financial performance targets for the annual incentive plan and stock price hurdles for our performance-based equity awards), providing balance and mitigating risks associated with focusing on a single metric; and

·Award accruals and payments are monitored on an ongoing basis by management, and with respect to our executive officers, by the Compensation Committee.

 

Additional features of our executive compensation program include:

 

·                  The Compensation Committee provides ongoing oversight.

43



Table of Contents

oversight;

·                  The Compensation Committee sets performance measures and goals under ourthe annual performance bonus plansincentive plan to ensure resulting payouts are appropriate for a given level of achievement.

the performance achieved;

·                  The Compensation Committee considers information from comparable companies when evaluating compensation levels and incentive opportunities, thereby avoiding unusually high pay opportunities relative to our peers or the market generally; and

·Our performance bonusincentive plans incorporate the exercise of negative(negative) discretion on the part of the Compensation Committee, which allows them discretion to make downward adjustments of payouts in response to our financial or operationaloperating performance.

·Our stock ownership guidelines promote long-term ownership of our stock and further align our executives’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders.

·Our policy to claw back certain bonus amounts in the event of a restatement of our financial statements helps to ensure executives act in the best interests of our company and its stockholders.

·A prohibition on insider trading.

 

We believe that our compensation programs effectively link performance-based compensation to the achievement of long-term and short-term goals and doesdo not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking. Based on the foregoing review and assessment, weWe also believe that our compensation policies and practices for employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

None of our executive officers serve, or in the past year have served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has executive officers who have served on our board of directors or compensation committee. Robert M. Le Blanc, M. Bernard Puckett (Chairman), Glenn S. Schafer, Linda Rosenstock and Bruce A. Yarwood served as the members of the Compensation Committee in 2014 and until the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015.  Since the closing of the Combination, David Reis, John F. DePodesta, Robert H. Fish, David Reis and Arnold Whitman have served as the members of the Compensation Committee.Committee during 2017.  Messrs. Reis and Whitman are parties to various agreements that are considered related party transactions, as follows:

 

Robert M. Le Blanc serves asMessrs. Reis and Whitman, along with Messrs. Fishman, Hartman and Neuberger, indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC PAC Holdings, LLC (“FC PAC”) totaling less than 10% in the aggregate.   Some of the company’s healthcare centers have entered into agreements, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, with companies that are owned indirectly by FC PAC. Pursuant to those agreements, such companies provide mobile radiology and laboratory/diagnostic services to approximately 425 and 180 of the company’s centers, respectively. We are unable to estimate the approximate dollar amount of these transactions because, depending upon the circumstances of each transaction, payments may be made by the center to the provider, by the provider to the center or by a Managing Directorthird party payor to the provider or the center.

Messrs. Reis and Whitman, along with Messrs. Fishman, Hartman and Neuberger, indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC Compassus LLC (“FC Compassus”) totaling less than 10% in the aggregate.  On May 1, 2016, in the ordinary course of Onex Corporationbusiness and on arms-length terms, the company sold the hospice and home health businesses that were operated by subsidiaries of the company to FC Compassus for a purchase price of $84.0 million.  The purchase price was paid $72.0 million in cash and $12.0 million by the delivery to the company of a promissory note.   On May 1, 2016, the Company entered into preferred provider and affiliation agreements with FC Compassus.  Fees for these services amounted to $11.8 million, $12.2 million and $12.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.   The combined note and accrued interest balance of $15.6 million remains outstanding at December 31, 2017.

Messrs. Reis and Whitman, along with Messrs. Fishman, Hartman and Neuberger, indirectly hold ownership interests in Lavie Care Centers, LLC, the parent company of Consulate Health Care (“Consulate”)During 2014, we had an agreement with Onex Partners Manager LP, or Onex Manager,Genesis Rehabilitation Services (“GRS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Onex Corporation,the company, has entered into agreements, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, with healthcare centers operated by Consulate pursuant to which togetherGRS provides therapy and respiratory services to such centers. GRS currently serves approximately 145 Consulate centers.  While it is difficult to determine the approximate dollar amount of these transactions, we estimate that that the aggregate billings by GRS for these services during 2017 was $142.2 million, and GRS collected approximately $130.8 million.  In addition, Consulate comprises $87.0 million, approximately 54%, of the outstanding contract receivables in the rehabilitation services business at December 31, 2017.  In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded customer receivership and other related charges of $55 million associated with its affiliates owned shares representingConsulate.

Mr. Whitman, along with Messrs. Hartman and Fishman, directly or indirectly hold ownership interests in Glenwood Realty totaling approximately 39% in the aggregate. A subsidiary of the company entered into a lease, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, pursuant to which it leases two centers in Alabama from Glenwood Realty. The annualized rent paid to the landlord is currently approximately $1.7 million.

Messrs. Reis and Whitman, along with Messrs. Fishman, Hartman and Neuberger, indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC Domino Acquisition, LLC (“FC Domino”) totaling less than 10% in the aggregate.  On July 1, 2015, in the

ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, a subsidiary of the company acquired 21 out-patient therapy clinics from FC Domino in exchange for a $1.0 million promissory note, which note remains outstanding as of April 24, 2017.

Messrs. Whitman and Reis, along with the holders of a majority of the voting power of our outstandingthe company’s common stock throughout 2014. In exchange for providing us with corporate finance(the “Stockholders”), entered into a Fourth Amended and strategic planning consulting services, we paid Onex Manager an annual fee of $0.5 million. We also reimbursed Onex Manager for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of servicesRestated Voting Agreement, dated February 15, 2018 (the “Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which they agreed that, with respect to all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of which each Stockholder is the agreement. In addition, throughout 2014, stockholders who collectively heldowner or otherwise holds the power to direct the vote at any particular future point in time (the “Shares”): (a) the Stockholders shall vote all of their Shares as determined by the Stockholders holding (i) with regard to the election of directors of the company, a majority of the Shares held by the Stockholders, and (ii) with regard to all other matters, at least seventy-five percent of the Shares held by the Stockholders; and (b) if, (i) with regard to any nominee for election as a director, Stockholders holding at least a majority of the Shares held by the Stockholders cannot agree, the Stockholders shall abstain or vote all of their Shares against such nominee, and (ii) with regard to all matters other than the election of directors, Stockholders holding at least seventy-five percent of the Shares held by the Stockholders cannot agree, the Stockholders shall abstain or vote all of their Shares against such matter. Accordingly, the Stockholders act as a “group,” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, in voting on all matters, including the election of directors. The securities beneficially owned by the parties to the Voting Agreement represent approximately 56.5% of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock on a fully as-converted and as-exchanged basis, and approximately 53.8% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock, including Onex Corporation, were party to an investor stockholders’ agreement. Under this agreement, those stockholders agreed to vote their shares on matters presented to the stockholders as specifically provided in the investor stockholders’ agreement, or, if not so provided, in the same manner as Onex. In particular, each non-Onex party agreed to vote all of its shares to elect to our board of directors such individuals as may be designated by Onex from time to time. Mr. Le Blanc was designated to serve on our board of directors by Onex. Both of the foregoing agreements were terminated upon the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

44



Table of Contents

AUDIT MATTERS

Audit Committee Report

Following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.’s audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 and the notes thereto.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.’s accounting principles) with management. Our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) and for evaluating the effectiveness of those internal controls and for evaluating any changes in those controls that will, or is reasonably likely to, affect internal controls over financial reporting. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) and for evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of our accounting principles) with Ernst & Young LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed Ernst & Young LLP’s Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules.

The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by applicable requirements of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP its independence from us.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. (formerly Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.) that its audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Submitted by:

James H. Bloem (Chair)
John F. DePodesta
Glenn S. Schafer
Members of the Audit Committee

45



Table of Contentscompany.

 

PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are seeking non-binding advisory stockholder approval of the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in the section of this proxy statement entitled “Executive and Director Compensation.” The vote does not address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Although the vote is non-binding, each of the board of directors and the Compensation Committee will review the voting results in connection with theirits regular evaluationsevaluation of our compensation programs.

 

Stockholders are being asked to vote on the following advisory resolution:

 

RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. (formerly Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.) hereby approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and the related tabular and narrative disclosure in the company’s proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

The compensation paid to our executive officers is based on an overall program design that ties a substantial percentage of an executive’s compensation to the attainment of financial and other performance measures (including quality of care that the board of directors and Compensation Committee believe promote the creation of long-term stockholder value and position our company for long-term success. As described more fully in the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, the mix of fixed and performance-based compensation, the terms of our annual performance plan and our long-term incentive awards, as well as the terms of our executives’ employment agreements, are designed to enable us to attract and maintain top talent while, at the same time, aligning performance and compensation.

 

Our board of directors believes that the design of our compensation programs, the information provided above and the disclosure in the Compensation Discussion Analysis section of this proxy statement demonstrate the aforementioned objectives. Stockholders are urged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, which discusses in detail how our compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy.

 

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ADOPTION OF THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION TO APPROVE, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THE COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS SECTION AND THE RELATED TABULAR AND NARRATIVE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT.

46



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3: APPROVAL OF THE GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. 2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLANAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

 

Following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to the company’s audited consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto.

The Audit Committee is composed of three members of our board of directors requests that stockholders approve the 2015 Plan. Thedirectors. Our board of directors has determined that each member is independent under the NYSE listing standards and applicable SEC rules and regulations. Our board of directors has also determined that each member is financially literate in accordance with NYSE listing standards and that our Chair, James H. Bloem, and Terry Allison Rappuhn each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by our board of directors. A copy of this charter is available under the 2015 Plan, subject“Corporate Governance” section of the Company’s website, www.genesishcc.com.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of the company’s accounting principles) with management. Our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) and for evaluating the effectiveness of those internal controls and any changes in those controls that will, or are reasonably likely to, affect internal controls over financial reporting. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) and for evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures.

KPMG LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for planning and conducting an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and for expressing an opinion as to the approvalconformity of these financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and as to the effectiveness of our stockholders.internal controls over financial reporting. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements (including the quality of our accounting principles) with KPMG LLP. The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301, “Communications with Audit Committees,” as adopted by the PCAOB. Further, the Audit Committee reviewed KPMG’s Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K related to its audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules.

 

IfThe Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and the 2015 Plan is approvedletter from KPMG LLP required by our stockholders,applicable requirements of the 2015 Plan will become effective uponPCAOB regarding KPMG LLP’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG LLP its approval (the “Effective Date”), and no further grants will be made under our existing equity incentive plan,independence from us.

The Audit Committee oversees the Amended and Restated Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “Prior Plan”). The 2015 Plan will terminateperformance of the Company’s internal audit function managed by the internal corporate auditors.

Members of the Audit Committee met privately during 2017 with KPMG LLP.

Based on the tenth anniversary ofreview and discussions referred to above, the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier byAudit Committee recommended to the board of directors but awards granted prior to such date may extend beyondof Genesis Healthcare, Inc. that date. If the 2015 Plan is not approved by our stockholders, no awards will be made under the 2015 Plan, but we will likely not have enough shares remaining under the Prior Plan to grant an appropriate amount of equity awardsits audited financial statements for 2015.

If this proposal is approved, the maximum number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan will be 19,000,000 plus (i) the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance, but with respect to which awards have not been made, under the Prior Plan (which, as of April 8, 2015 constituted 1,827,810 shares), and (ii) the number of shares of common stock subject to awards outstanding on the Effective Date under the Prior Plan, which, in each case, are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the plan participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares of common stock surrendered or withheld under the Prior Plan as payment of either the exercise price of an award (including shares of common stock otherwise underlying an award of a share appreciation right that are retained by the company to account for the exercise price of such share appreciation right) and/or withholding taxes in respect of an award shall not be reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Upon the Effective Date, no further awards will be made under the Prior Plan, but outstanding awards will continue in effect in accordance with their terms.

In addition to requesting shareholder approval of the 2015 Plan and the new shares being reserved for issuance (19,000,000), we also are requesting shareholder approval of the material terms of the 2015 Plan in order to allow performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code to be tax-deductible, to the extent applicable to us, including performance measures and maximum individual limits. See “Performance-Based Awards” below. The company is required to obtain this approval for performance-based awards in order to ensure that we can claim an income tax deduction when we pay such awards.

Under Section 162(m) of the Code, annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to individuals who are “covered employees” will not be deductible by us unless it is “performance-based compensation.” The plan administrator may make awards under the 2015 Plan to eligible participants who are covered employees (or to individuals whom the plan administrator believes may become covered employees) that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, to the extent it is applicable to us. To qualify, the exercisability and/or payment of such awards will generally be subject to the achievement of performance criteria based upon one or more performance goals set forth in the 2015 Plan and to certification of such achievement in writing by the Compensation Committee. The performance criteria will be established in writing by that committee not later than the time period prescribed under Section 162(m) of the Code.

Final approval of the 2015 Plan by our stockholders will enable us to grant “incentive stock options,” or “ISOs,” which qualify for certain favorable tax treatment under Section 421 of the Code.

Grants of options, restricted shares, restricted stock units and other share-based awards to our officers, employees, directors, independent contractors and consultants are an important part of our long-term incentive compensation program, which we use in order to strengthen the commitment of such individuals to the company, motivate them to faithfully and diligently perform their responsibilities and attract and retain competent and dedicated individuals whose efforts will result in the long-term growth and profitability of the company.

Board Recommendation

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. 2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The information in the following table may be relevant to your consideration of this proposal. The following table summarizes the company’s compensation plan information (including individual compensation arrangements) as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

47



Table of Contents

Plan Category

 

Number of
securities to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights(1)

 

Weighted-
average

exercise
price of

outstanding
options,
warrants
and rights
($)

 

Number of
securities remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in the first
column)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

782,622

 

$

9.35

(2)

1,110,274

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

782,622

 

$

9.35

(2)

1,110,274

 


(1)Includes restricted stock units and options to purchase the company’s shares of Class A common stock awarded under the Amended and Restated Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan.

(2)Restricted stock units are settled in the company’s shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis; therefore, this weighted-average exercise price does not include outstanding restricted share units.

Historical Annual Share Usage

While the use of equity is an important part of our compensation program, we are mindful of our responsibility to our stockholders to exercise judgment in granting equity awards.

Although our future burn rate will depend upon and be influenced by a number of factors, such as the number of plan participants, the price per share of our common stock and the methodology used to establish the equity award mix, the 19,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan will enable us to continue to utilize stock-based awards as a significant component of our compensation program and help meet our objectives to attract, retain and incentivize talented personnel. In determining the share reserve, we considered an analysis of the company’s overall equity plan dilution and annual share utilization (“burn rate”) relative to a peer group of comparable companies. The results of the analysis indicated that at 19,000,000 shares, our overall plan dilution (shares available and outstanding grants) would be slightly below the median of the peer group.

Overhang

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 1.8 million shares of our common stock subject to outstanding equity awards or available for future equity awards under the Prior Plan, which represented approximately 4.4% of our fully diluted shares of common stock outstanding (or, the “overhang percentage”) as of that date. The 19 million new shares proposed to2017 be included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2015 Plan share reserve would increasefiscal year ended December 31, 2017, for filing with the overhang percentage as of April 8, 2015 (which reflects our outstanding share capital on a post-Combination basis) to approximately 11.0%.SEC.

 

Share Usage

The annual share usage under the company’s equity compensation program for the last three fiscal years is set forth in the following table. For purposes of calculating dilution, unlike time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock, stock options and restricted stock units are not shares of common stock. As a result, stock options and restricted stock units are not included in our basic weighted average common shares outstanding in the table below, and they are therefore added to the number of basic weighted average common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating dilution.

 

 

Fiscal Year
2014

 

Fiscal Year
2013

 

Fiscal Year
2012

 

Average

 

(A) Stock Options Granted

 

 

 

106,748

 

35,583

 

(B) Time-Based Restricted Stock Granted

 

362,239

 

284,245

 

195,127

 

280,537

 

(C) Performance-Based Restricted Stock Granted

 

512,475

 

1,371,984

 

360,535

 

748,331

 

(D) Restricted Stock Units Granted

 

72,848

 

80,480

 

86,328

 

79,885

 

(E) Total Awards Granted (Excluding Stock Options) (B+C+D)

 

947,562

 

1,736,709

 

641,990

 

1,108,754

 

(F) Total Awards Granted (Including Stock Options) (A+E)

 

947,562

 

1,736,709

 

748,738

 

1,144,336

 

(G) Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding

 

38,124,601

 

37,532,740

 

37,388,488

 

37,681,943

 

(H) Annual Share Usage (F / G)

 

2.5

%

4.6

%

2.0

%

3.0

%

(I) Dilution (F / [A+D+G])

 

2.5

%

4.6

%

2.0

%

3.0

%

48

Submitted by:

James H. Bloem (Chair)

John F. DePodesta

Terry Allison Rappuhn

Members of the Audit Committee



Table of Contents

Description of the 2015 Plan

The following is a summary of the material features of the 2015 Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2015 Plan, a copy of which is included as Exhibit A hereto.

Types of Awards

The 2015 Plan provides for the issuance of options, share appreciation rights (referred to as SARs), restricted shares, restricted stock units (referred to as RSUs), other share-based awards and cash awards to our officers, employees, directors, independent contractors and consultants.

Shares Available; Certain Limitations

The maximum number of shares of common stock reserved and available for issuance under the 2015 Plan will be equal to the sum of 19,000,000 plus (i) the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance, but with respect to which awards have not been made, under the Prior Plan, and (ii) the number of shares of common stock subject to awards outstanding on the Effective Date under the Prior Plan, which, in each case, are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the plan participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares of common stock surrendered or withheld under the Prior Plan as payment of either the exercise price of an award (including shares of common stock otherwise underlying an award of a share appreciation right that are retained by the company to account for the exercise price of such share appreciation right) and/or withholding taxes in respect of an award shall not be reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan. Upon the Effective Date, no further awards shall be made under the Prior Plan. No individual (including any individual who is likely to be a “covered employee” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code) may be granted options or SARs during any fiscal year in excess of 2,000,000 shares or restricted shares, RSUs, or other share-based awards in excess of 1,000,000 shares during any single fiscal year. In addition, the maximum cash award that any such individual may receive with respect to a cash award in respect of any annual performance period is $2,500,000 and for any other performance period, such amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months in the performance period and the denominator of which is twelve (12).  In addition, no non-employee director shall be granted awards in any consecutive 12-month period in respect of shares of common stock having a fair market value of more than $750,000, as measured as of the applicable grant date.

Shares of common stock subject to an award under the 2015 Plan that remain unissued upon the cancellation or termination of the award will again become available for grant under the 2015 Plan. However, shares of common stock that are surrendered by a participant or withheld as payment of the exercise price in connection with any award under the 2015 Plan, as well as any shares of common stock exchanged by a participant or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations related to any award, will not be available for subsequent awards under the 2015 Plan. If an award is denominated in shares, but settled in cash, the number of shares of common stock previously subject to the award will again be available for grants under the 2015 Plan. If an award can only be settled in cash, it will not be counted against the total number of shares of common stock available for grant under the 2015 Plan.

Administration

The 2015 Plan will be administered by the board of directors, or if the board does not administer the 2015 Plan, a committee of the board that complies with the applicable requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any other applicable legal or stock exchange listing requirements (the board or committee referred to above being sometimes referred to as the plan administrator). The plan administrator may interpret the 2015 Plan and may prescribe, amend and rescind rules and make all other determinations necessary or desirable for the administration of the 2015 Plan, provided that the plan administrator will not have the authority to re-price or cancel and re-grant any award at a

49



Table of Contents

lower exercise, base or purchase price or cancel any award with an exercise, base or purchase price in exchange for cash, property or other awards without first obtaining the approval of our stockholders.

The 2015 Plan permits the plan administrator to select the eligible recipients who will receive awards, to determine the terms and conditions of those awards, including but not limited to the exercise price or other purchase price of an award, the number of shares of common stock or cash or other property subject to an award, the term of an award and the vesting schedule applicable to an award, and to amend the terms and conditions of outstanding awards.

Restricted Shares and RSUs

Restricted shares and RSUs may be granted under the 2015 Plan. The plan administrator will determine the purchase price, vesting schedule and performance goals, if any, applicable to the grant of restricted shares. If the restrictions, performance goals or other conditions determined by the plan administrator are not satisfied, the restricted shares and RSUs will be forfeited. Subject to the provisions of the 2015 Plan and the applicable individual award agreement, the plan administrator has the sole discretion to provide for the lapse of restrictions in installments or the acceleration or waiver of restrictions (in whole or part) under certain circumstances, including the attainment of certain performance goals, a participant’s termination of employment or service or a participant’s death or disability. The rights of restricted share and RSU holders upon a termination of employment or service will be set forth in individual award agreements.

Unless the applicable award agreement provides otherwise, participants with restricted shares will generally have all of the rights of a shareholder during the restricted period, including the right to receive dividends declared with respect to such shares; provided, however, that dividends declared during the restricted period with respect to an award that vests or becomes payable upon the achievement of performance goals shall only become payable if (and to the extent) that the performance goals underlying the award are achieved. During the restricted period, participants with RSUs will generally not have any rights of a shareholder, but may be credited with dividend equivalent rights if the applicable individual award agreement so provides.

Options

We may issue non-qualified stock options and “incentive stock options” or “ISOs” (within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code) under the 2015 Plan. No more than 8,500,000 shares may be made subject to ISOs. The terms and conditions of any options granted to a participant will be set forth in an award agreement and, subject to the provisions in the 2015 Plan, will be determined by the plan administrator. The exercise price of any option granted under our 2015 Plan must be at least equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date the option is granted (110% of fair market value in the case of ISOs granted to ten percent stockholders). The maximum term of an option granted under our 2015 Plan is ten (10) years. The amount of incentive stock options that become exercisable for the first time in a particular year cannot exceed a value of $100,000 per participant, determined using the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant.

Subject to our 2015 Plan, the plan administrator will determine the vesting and other terms and conditions of options granted under our 2015 Plan and the plan administrator will have the authority to accelerate the vesting of any option in its sole discretion. Unless the applicable option award agreement provides otherwise, in the event of a participant’s termination of employment or service for any reason other than for cause, disability or death, such participant’s options (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until 90 days after such termination and then expire. Unless the applicable option agreement provides otherwise, in the event of a participant’s termination of employment or service due to disability or death, such participant’s options (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until six (6) months after such termination and will then expire. Options that were not exercisable on the date of termination for any reason other than for cause will expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. In the event of a participant’s termination of employment or service for cause, such participant’s outstanding options will expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination. In no event, however, may an option be exercised after the expiration of its term.

Share Appreciation Rights

SARs may be granted under the 2015 Plan either alone or in conjunction with all or part of any option granted under the 2015 Plan. A free-standing SAR granted under the 2015 Plan entitles its holder to receive, at the time of exercise, an amount per share up to the excess of the fair market value (at the date of exercise) of a share common stock over the exercise price of the free-standing SAR multiplied by the number of shares in respect of which the SAR is being exercised. A SAR granted in conjunction with all or part of an option under the 2015 Plan entitles its holder to receive, at the time of exercise of the SAR and surrender of the related option, an amount per share up to the excess of the fair market value (at the date of exercise) of a share of common stock over the exercise price of the related option multiplied by the number of shares in respect of which the SAR is being exercised. Each SAR will be granted with an exercise price that is not less than 100% of the fair market value of the related shares of common stock on the date of grant. Unless the applicable SAR award agreement provides otherwise, in the event of an participant’s termination of employment or service for any reason other than for cause, disability or death, such participant’s SARs (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until 90 days after such termination and then expire. Unless the applicable SAR award agreement provides otherwise, in the event of a

50



Table of Contents

participant’s termination of employment or service due to disability or death, such participant’s SARs (to the extent exercisable at the time of such termination) generally will remain exercisable until six (6) months after such termination and will then expire. SARs that were not exercisable on the date of termination for any reason other than for cause will expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. In the event of a participant’s termination of employment or service for cause, such participant’s outstanding SARs will expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination. The maximum term of all SARs granted under the 2015 Plan will be determined by the plan administrator, but may not exceed ten (10) years. The plan administrator may determine to settle the exercise of a SAR in shares of common stock, cash, or any combination thereof.

Each free-standing SAR will vest and become exercisable (including in the event of the SAR holder’s termination of employment or service) at such time and subject to such terms and conditions as determined by the plan administrator in the applicable individual free-standing SAR agreement. SARs granted in conjunction with all or part of an option will be exercisable at such times and subject to all of the terms and conditions applicable to the related option.

Other Share-Based Awards

Other share-based awards, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, shares of common stock (including dividend equivalents) may be granted under the 2015 Plan. The plan administrator will determine the terms and conditions of such other share-based awards, including the number of shares of common stock to be granted pursuant to such other share-based awards, the manner in which such other share-based awards will be settled (e.g., in shares of common stock, cash or other property), and the conditions to the vesting and payment of such other share-based awards (including the achievement of performance goals). The rights of participants granted other share-based awards upon the termination of employment or service to the company will be set forth in the award agreement.

Cash Awards

Bonuses that are payable solely in cash may also be granted under the 2015 Plan, and may be granted contingent upon the achievement of performance goals. The rights of participants granted cash awards upon the termination of employment or service to the company will be set forth in the applicable award agreement.

Performance Goals

The vesting of awards that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code will be based upon one or more of the following criteria: (i) earnings, including one or more of operating income, net operating income, earnings before or after taxes, earnings before or after interest, depreciation, amortization, adjusted EBITDA, economic earnings, or extraordinary or special items or book value per share (which may exclude nonrecurring items); (ii) pre-tax income or after-tax income; (iii) earnings per share (basic or diluted); (iv) operating profit; (v) revenue, revenue growth or rate of revenue growth; (vi) return on assets (gross or net), return on investment, return on capital, or return on equity; (vii) returns on sales or revenues; (viii) operating expenses; (ix) share price appreciation; (x) cash flow, cash flow per share, free cash flow, cash flow return on investment (discounted or otherwise), net cash provided by operations, or cash flow in excess of cost of capital; (xi) implementation or completion of critical projects or processes; (xii) cumulative earnings per share growth; (xiii) operating margin or profit margin; (xiv) cost targets, reductions and savings, productivity and efficiencies; (xv) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion, customer satisfaction, quality of patient care, employee satisfaction, human resources management, supervision of litigation, information technology, and goals relating to acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and similar transactions, and budget comparisons; (xvi) personal professional objectives, including any of the foregoing performance goals, the implementation of policies and plans, the negotiation of transactions, the development of long term business goals, formation of joint ventures, research or development collaborations, and the completion of other corporate transactions; (xvii) any combination of, or a specified increase in, any of the foregoing, (xviii) economic value created; and (xix) share price or total shareholder return.

The criteria may be expressed in terms of attaining a specified level of the particular criteria or the attainment of a percentage increase or decrease in the particular criteria, and may be applied to us or any of our affiliates, or one of our divisions or strategic business units or a division or strategic business unit of any of our affiliates, or may be applied to our performance relative to a market index, a group of other companies or a combination thereof, all as determined by the plan administrator. The criteria may also be subject to a threshold level of performance below which no payment will be made, levels of performance at which specified payments will be made, and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment will be made. The criteria will be determined in accordance with GAAP (to the extent applicable) and achievement of the criteria will require certification by the plan administrator. To the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code, the plan administrator will have the authority to make equitable adjustments to the criteria in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting us or any of our affiliates or our financial statements or the financial statements of any of our affiliates, in response to changes in applicable laws or regulations, or to account for items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related to the disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting principles.

51



Table of Contents

Equitable Adjustments

In the event of a merger, amalgamation, consolidation, reclassification, recapitalization, spin-off, spin-out, repurchase, reorganization, special or extraordinary dividend or other extraordinary distribution (whether in the form of shares of common stock, cash or other property), stock split, reverse stock split, share subdivision or consolidation, combination, exchange of shares, or other change in corporate structure affecting the shares of common stock, an equitable substitution or proportionate adjustment shall be made in (i) the aggregate number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan, (ii) the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be subject to awards granted to any participant in any calendar or fiscal year, (iii) the kind and number of securities subject to, and the exercise price of, any outstanding options and SARs granted under the 2015 Plan, and (iv) the kind, number and purchase price of shares of common stock, or the amount of cash or amount or type of property, subject to outstanding restricted shares, RSUs and other share-based awards granted under the 2015 Plan. Equitable substitutions or adjustments other than those listed above may also be made as determined by the plan administrator. In addition, the plan administrator may terminate all outstanding awards for the payment of cash or in-kind consideration having an aggregate fair market value equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of common stock, cash or other property covered by such awards over the aggregate exercise price, if any, of such awards, but if the exercise price of any outstanding award is equal to or greater than the fair market value of the shares of common stock, cash or other property covered by such award, the board may cancel the award without the payment of any consideration to the participant.  With respect to awards subject to foreign laws, adjustments will be made in compliance with applicable requirements.  Except to the extent determined by the plan administrator, adjustments to incentive stock options will be made only to the extent not constituting a “modification” within the meaning of Section 424(h)(3) of the Code.

Change in Control

In the event that a “change in control” of the company or FC-GEN, our major affiliate (in each case, as defined in the 2015 Plan) occurs, then (a) with respect to awards not subject to performance conditions, the restrictions (including exercise restrictions), deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to any award will lapse and such unvested awards will be deemed fully vested, (b) any award subject to performance conditions which are tied to a price of a share of common stock will only vest to the extent performance conditions are met as of the date of the change in control, and (c) any award subject to performance conditions which are not determined by reference to the price of a share of common stock will only vest to the extent performance conditions are on track to be met based on the performance through the date of the change in control, as determined in the sole discretion of the plan administrator. The plan administrator will also have the discretion to provide that all options or stock appreciation rights outstanding immediately prior to such change in control will expire on the effective date of such change in control.

Tax Withholding

Each participant will be required to make arrangements satisfactory to the plan administrator regarding payment of the minimum amount of applicable taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to any award granted under the 2015 Plan. The company has the right, to the extent permitted by law, to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the participant. With the approval of the plan administrator, the participant may satisfy the foregoing requirement by either electing to have us withhold from delivery of shares of common stock, cash or other property, as applicable, or by delivering already owned unrestricted shares of common stock, in each case, having a value not exceeding the applicable taxes to be withheld and applied to the tax obligations. We may also use any other method of obtaining the necessary payment or proceeds, as permitted by law, to satisfy our withholding obligation with respect to any award.

Amendment and Termination of the 2015 Plan

The 2015 Plan provides the board of directors with authority to amend, alter or terminate the 2015 Plan, but no such action may impair the rights of any participant with respect to outstanding awards without the participant’s consent. The plan administrator may amend an award, prospectively or retroactively, but no such amendment may materially impair the rights of any participant without the participant’s consent. Shareholder approval of any such action will be obtained if required to comply with applicable law.

2015 Plan Term

The 2015 Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date (although awards granted before that time will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms).

52



Table of Contents

U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of certain United States federal income tax consequences of awards under the 2015 Plan. It does not purport to be a complete description of all applicable rules, and those rules (including those summarized here) are subject to change.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

A participant who has been granted a non-qualified stock option will not recognize taxable income upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option. Rather, at the time of exercise of such non-qualified stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary income for income tax purposes in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over the exercise price. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at such time and in the same amount that the participant recognizes ordinary income. If shares acquired upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option are later sold or exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon such sale or exchange and the fair market value of such shares on the date of such exercise will generally be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the shares are a capital asset of the participant) depending upon the length of time such shares were held by the participant.

Incentive Stock Options

In general, no taxable income is realized by a participant upon the grant of an ISO. If shares of common stock are purchased by a participant, or option shares, pursuant to the exercise of an ISO granted under the 2015 Plan and the participant does not dispose of the option shares within the two-year period after the date of grant or within one year after the receipt of such option shares by the participant, such disposition a disqualifying disposition, then, generally (1) the participant will not realize ordinary income upon exercise and (2) upon sale of such option shares, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price paid for the option shares will be taxed to such participant as capital gain (or loss). The amount by which the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the exercise date of an ISO exceeds the purchase price generally will constitute an item which increases the participant’s “alternative minimum taxable income.” If option shares acquired upon the exercise of an ISO are disposed of in a disqualifying disposition, the participant generally would include in ordinary income in the year of disposition an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of the option shares), over the exercise price paid for the option shares. Subject to certain exceptions, an option generally will not be treated as an ISO if it is exercised more than three months following termination of employment. If an ISO is exercised at a time when it no longer qualifies as an ISO, such option will be treated as a nonqualified stock option as discussed above. In general, we will receive an income tax deduction at the same time and in the same amount as the participant recognizes ordinary income.

Share Appreciation Rights

A participant who is granted a SAR generally will not recognize ordinary income upon receipt of the SAR. Rather, at the time of exercise of such SAR, the participant will recognize ordinary income for income tax purposes in an amount equal to the value of any cash received and the fair market value on the date of exercise of any shares received. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at such time and in the same amount, if any, that the participant recognizes as ordinary income. The participant’s tax basis in any shares of common stock received upon exercise of a SAR will be the fair market value of the shares common stock on the date of exercise, and if the shares are later sold or exchanged, then the difference between the amount received upon such sale or exchange and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise will generally be taxable as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss (if the shares are a capital asset of the participant) depending upon the length of time such shares were held by the participant.

Restricted Shares

A participant generally will not be taxed upon the grant of restricted shares, but rather will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at the earlier of the time the shares become transferable or are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (within the meaning of the Code). We generally will be entitled to a deduction at the time when, and in the amount that, the participant recognizes ordinary income on account of the lapse of the restrictions. A participant’s tax basis in the shares will equal their fair market value at the time the restrictions lapse, and the participant’s holding period for capital gains purposes will begin at that time. Any cash dividends paid on the shares before the restrictions lapse will be taxable to the participant as additional compensation and not as dividend income. Under Section 83(b) of the Code, a participant may elect to recognize ordinary income at the time the restricted shares are awarded in an amount equal to their fair market value at that time, notwithstanding the fact that such shares are subject to restrictions on transfer and a substantial risk of forfeiture. If such an election is made, no additional taxable income will be recognized by such participant at the time the restrictions lapse, the participant will have a tax basis in the shares equal to their fair market value on the date of their award, and the participant’s holding period for capital gains purposes will begin at that time. We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the time when, and to the extent that, ordinary income is recognized by such participant.

53



Table of Contents

RSUs

In general, the grant of RSUs will not result in income for the participant or in a tax deduction for us. Upon the settlement of such an award in cash or shares, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the aggregate value of the payment received, and we generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the same time and in the same amount.

Other Awards

With respect to other awards granted under the 2015 Plan, including other share-based award and cash awards, generally when the participant receives payment with respect to an award, the amount of cash and/or the fair market value of any shares of common stock or other property received will be ordinary income to the participant, and we generally will be entitled to a tax deduction at the same time and in the same amount.

Section 162(m)

Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction for certain annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to individuals who are “covered employees” unless it qualifies as “performance-based compensation.” The plan administrator may make awards under the 2015 Plan to eligible participants who are covered employees (or to individuals whom the plan administrator believes may become covered employees) that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. To qualify, the exercisability and/or payment of such awards must generally be subject to the achievement of performance criteria based upon one or more performance goals set forth in the 2015 Plan and to certification of such achievement in writing by the plan administrator. The performance criteria must be established in writing by the plan administrator not later than the time period prescribed under Section 162(m) of the Code.

New Plan Benefits

We have determined to award the number or dollar value, as the case may be, of RSUs to the individuals and groups identified below, subject to approval by our stockholders of the 2015 Plan. Other benefits to be provided under the 2015 Plan will be granted at the discretion of the Compensation Committee and accordingly are not determinable at this time.

Name and Position

 

Dollar Value ($) of
Restricted Stock
Units

 

Number of
Restricted Stock
Units

 

George V. Hager, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer

 

 

113,000

 

Robert A. (“Mike”) Reitz
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

 

 

58,000

 

Thomas DiVittorio
Chief Financial Officer

 

 

51,000

 

Dan Hirschfeld

 

 

46,000

 

Executive Vice President and President, Genesis Rehabilitation Services, Respiratory Health Services and CareerStaff Unlimited

 

 

 

 

 

Michael S. Sherman
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary and Assistant Treasurer

 

 

32,000

 

JoAnne Reifsnyder
Senior Vice President, Clinical Operations and Chief Nursing Officer

 

 

38,000

 

Executive Group

 

 

338,000

 

Non-Executive Director Group

 

$

1,200,000

 

 

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

 

 

4,812,000

 

54



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4: 3: RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF 
 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee of our board of directors has selected KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015,2018, and has further directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accountants for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. A representative of KPMG LLP is expected to attend the annual meeting, and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Although ratification by our stockholders is not a prerequisite to the ability of the Audit Committee to select KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, we believe such ratification is desirable and in the best interests of our stockholders. Accordingly, stockholders are being requested to ratify, confirm and approve the selection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG LLP, the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm will be reconsidered by the Audit Committee; provided, however, that the Audit Committee may select KPMG LLP notwithstanding the failure of the stockholders to ratify its selection. If the appointment of KPMG LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee will continue to conduct an ongoing review of KPMG LLP’s scope of engagement, pricing and work quality, among other factors, and will retain the right to replace KPMG LLP at any time.

 

For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, Ernst & Young LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm. On February 16, 2015, the Audit Committee chose to (i) dismiss Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm, and (ii) formally engage KPMG LLP to be our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.  For additional information regarding the change in independent registered public accounting firm, please see “—Dismissal of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” below.

Board Recommendation

 

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015.2018.

 

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Ernst & YoungKPMG LLP, which served as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, provided audit, audit-related and tax services to us during those fiscal years as follows:years. The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm:

 

Type of Fees

 

Fiscal 2014

 

Fiscal 2013

 

 

Fiscal 2017

 

Fiscal 2016

 

Audit Fees

 

$

1,046,504

 

$

1,050,091

 

 

$

5,115,000

 

$

4,010,000

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

 

 

 

 

93,500

 

Tax Fees

 

143,900

 

502,250

 

 

400,000

 

633,342

 

All Other Fees

 

983,024

 

 

 

3,477

 

47,009

 

Total

 

$

2,173,428

 

$

1,404,966

 

 

$

5,518,477

 

$

4,783,851

 

 

Audit Fees

 

This category includes fees associated with our annual audit and the review of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of our interim financial statements, and thestatements.  In 2017, this category included assistance with the review of our SEC registration statements.

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

ThisIn 2016, this category includes fees associated with accounting consultations and attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation.  No fees were incurred for these items in 2014 or 2013.attributable to retirement plan compliance audits.

 

Tax Fees

 

In 2014,2017, this category included $9,000$300,000 in fees associated with tax return preparation and $134,900$100,000 in fees associated with our tax receivable agreement. In 2016, this category included $425,000 in fees associated with tax return preparation and $208,342 in fees associated with tax planning and advice. In 2013, this category included $210,000 in fees associated with tax return preparation and $144,875 in fees associated with tax planning and advice.

55



Table of Contents

 

All Other Fees

 

In 2014,2017, this category included $983,024$3,477 in fees associated with due diligencecost reporting software.  In 2016, this category included $5,000 in fees associated with cost reporting software and $42,009 in fees related to other advisory services. We did not engage Ernst & Young LLP to provide any other services in 2013.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

Pursuant to its charter, the Audit Committee is required to pre-approve audit or non-audit services before the independent auditor is engaged by the Companycompany or its subsidiaries. The Chairman of the Audit Committee is also authorized to grant pre-approvals, provided such approvals are presented to the Audit Committee at a subsequent meeting.  In fiscal years 2017 and 2016 all audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees were pre-approved in accordance with the Audit Committee’s charter.

 

The Audit Committee specifically approved all of the audit and non-audit services performed by Ernst & YoungKPMG LLP and determined the rendering of such non-audit services was compatible with maintaining Ernst & Young LLP’s independence. In fiscal years 2014 and 2013 all audit fees, audit-related fees, and tax fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee directly.

Dismissalindependence of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Combination of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. and FC-GEN was treated as a “reverse acquisition” for accounting purposes and, as such, the historical financial statements of the accounting acquirer, FC-GEN, which were audited by KPMG LLP, will become the historical financial statements of Genesis Healthcare.

On February 16, 2015, the Audit Committee chose to (i) dismiss Ernst & Young LLP as Genesis Healthcare’s independent registered public accounting firm, and (ii) formally engage KPMG LLP to be the independent registered public accounting firm for Genesis Healthcare for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. The dismissal of Ernst & Young LLP became effective upon the issuance by Ernst & Young LLP of its reports on the company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 for inclusion in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014.

Ernst & Young LLP’s reports on the company’s financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or qualification or modification as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles. In addition, during the company’s two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its report.

Genesis Healthcare has provided Ernst & Young LLP with a copy of the foregoing disclosures and requested that Ernst & Young LLP furnish a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether it agreed with the above statements made by the company. A copy of such letter, dated February 19, 2015, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on February 20, 2015.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and subsequent period through the date of this report, neither the company nor anyone on its behalf consulted with KPMG LLP regarding (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the company’s financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the company that KPMG LLP concluded was an important factor considered by the company in reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue; or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a “disagreement” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K) or a “reportable event” (as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K).

56



Table of ContentsLLP.

 

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

 

Policy Regarding Related Person Transactions

 

Since 2007, ourOur board of directors has had a written policy to which all related party transactions are subject. Related party transactions are transactions between us and our directors or members of senior management, as defined by Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act of 1933.1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Under SEC rules, a related party is, or any time since the beginning of the last fiscal year was, a director, executive officer, nominee for director, a 5% stockholder of the company, or an immediate family member (as defined under applicable SEC rules) of such persons, or a 5% stockholderany of the Company.foregoing. A related party transaction is any transaction, arrangement or relationship (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships) in which the Companycompany or a subsidiary is a participant, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related party had, has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Pursuant to the policy, existing related party transactions are reviewed on a biannualan annual basis with the goals of ensuring that such transactions are being pursued in accordance with all of the understandings and commitments made at the time they were previously approved, ensuring that payments being made with respect to such transactions are appropriately reviewed and documented and reaffirming the continuing desirability of and need for each related party arrangement.

 

Newly proposed related party transactions are fullysubject to review and carefully reviewedapproval by the Audit Committee for evaluation and approval. The Audit Committee has the authority to hire and consult with outside financial, legal and other advisors as it deems appropriate in its evaluation of any such proposed transactions.Committee. The information provided to the directors reviewing a transaction must be sufficiently comprehensive so that the Audit Committee can reach informed decisions about related party transactions.

 

In addition, our board of directors takes active measures to ensure that the entities providing these related party services are being held to the same standards that we would demand of unaffiliated third-party service providers and there is a clear and articulable reason for procuring the services from a related party.

 

Except as set forth below, each of the transactions identified below was approved by our Audit Committee.

 

Related Person Transactions

Agreement with Onex Partners Manager LP

Throughout 2014 we had an agreement with Onex Partners Manager LP, or Onex Manager, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Onex Corporation, which together with its affiliates owned shares representing a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock throughout 2014. In exchange for providing us with corporate finance and strategic planning consulting services, we paid Onex Manager an annual fee of $0.5 million. We also reimbursed Onex Manager for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of services pursuant to the agreement. Robert M. Le Blanc, who served as one of our directors throughout 2014, and Joshua Hausman, who has served as one of our directors since February 2015, currently serve as Managing Directors of Onex Corporation. This agreement was originally negotiated and entered into in conjunction with Onex’s acquisition of our predecessor company in 2005. This agreement was terminated upon the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

Stockholders’ Agreement

Throughout 2014 stockholders who collectively held a majority of the voting power of our outstanding common stock, including Onex Corporation and certain of its affiliates, were party to an investor stockholders’ agreement. Under this agreement, those stockholders agreed to vote their shares on matters presented to the stockholders as specifically provided in the investor stockholders’ agreement, or, if not so provided, in the same manner as Onex. In particular, each non-Onex party agreed to vote all of its shares to elect to our board of directors such individuals as may be designated by Onex from time to time. Mr. Le Blanc was designated to serve on our board of directors by Onex. This agreement was originally negotiated and entered into in conjunction with Onex’s acquisition of our predecessor company in 2005. This agreement was terminated upon the closing of the Combination on February 2, 2015.

Agreement with Executive Search Solutions

Throughout 2014 we were party to an employee placement agreement with Executive Search Solutions, LLC, or ESS, a provider of recruiting services to the healthcare services industry, pursuant to which we paid ESS $13,905 a month to provide us with qualified candidates based on our specified criteria for positions including director of nursing, business office manager and nursing home administrator and overhead positions at a director level or above. Our former President and Chief Operating Officer, Jose C. Lynch (whose employment with us ended in January 2014), served as a managing member of and held an ownership interest in ESS. We paid ESS a total of $152,955 in 2014. This agreement was terminated in January 2015.

57



Table of Contents

Separation Agreements with Named Executive Officers

As discussed above, our Compensation Committee adopted certain retention and separation payment programs applicable to our Named Executive Officers in connection with the Combination. Each of the Named Executive Officers entered into customary separation and release agreements with the company upon their respective terminations of employment, which gave effect to the retention and separation payments contemplated by the aforementioned programs. Mr. Fish, who remains a member of our board of directors, participated in the aforementioned programs, part of which includes the continuation of his healthcare benefits for a period of 24 months following his termination of employment as our Chief Executive Officer upon the completion of the Combination in February 2015. Please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control — Combination Retention and Separation Program” above for more information regarding these programs and the related payments made to the Named Executive Officers as a result of them.

Consulting Agreement with Roland G. Rapp

Following the termination of his employment in March 2015, we retained Roland G. Rapp, who is our former Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary, and one of our Named Executive Officers for 2014, as a consultant in connection with an ongoing HUD-financing related project that the company is working on. The term of the consulting agreement ends on December 31, 2015. Under the arrangement, Mr. Rapp will receive reimbursement of his reasonable business expenses incurred on the project, and will be paid a success fee equal to 1/10 of 1% of the amount of the HUD-insured loans that are funded in connection with the project, if any. He will also be entitled to receive an additional success fee of 1/20 of 1% of the funded amount, if any, if certain criteria are met. There is no guarantee that any such loans will actually be funded at any time, or that Mr. Rapp will receive any associated success fee(s).

 

Tax Receivable Agreement

 

In connection with the closing of the Combination, on February 2, 2015, we entered into a tax receivable agreement (the “TRA”) with certain members of FC-GEN, which is now a subsidiary of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. that provides for the payment by us to such members of FC-GEN of 90% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we actually realize as a result of (a) any increase in tax basis attributable to the exchange of FC-GEN Class A Units for shares of Class A Common Stock by such members of FC-GEN and (b) the tax benefits related to imputed interest we are deemed to pay under the Code or any provision of state, local or non-U.S. tax law as a result of our payment obligations to such members under the TRA.

 

The holders of FC-GEN Class A Units (other than Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries) have the right (subject to certain limitations) to exchange their FC-GEN Class A Units for shares of our Class A Common Stock or, at the option of Sun Healthcare Group, Inc. (of which we own 100% of the shares), cash. As a result of such exchanges, our indirect share of the tax basis in the assets owned by FC-GEN and certain of its subsidiaries may increase. Any such increases in tax basis are likely to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions and therefore reduce the amount of income tax that we otherwise would be required to pay in the future. These increases in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain capital assets to the extent the increased tax basis is allocated to those capital assets. The Internal Revenue Service, however, may challenge all or part of the existing tax basis, tax basis increase and increased deductions, and a court could sustain such a challenge.

Under the TRA, the benefits we are deemed to realize as a result of the increase in tax basis attributable to the members of FC-GEN generally will be computed by comparing our actual income tax liability to the amount of such taxes that we would have been required to pay had there been no such increase in tax basis.

 

Estimating the amount of payments that may be made under the TRA is by its nature imprecise, insofar as the calculation of amounts payable depends on a variety of factors. The actual increase in tax basis and deductions, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, will vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of exchanges, the price of shares of our Class A Common Stock at the time of an exchange, and the amount and timing of our income.

 

The TRA also provides that upon certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control, our obligations under the TRA would be based on certain assumptions. As a result of such assumptions, we could be required to make payments under the TRA that are greater or less than the specified percentage of the actual benefits we realize that are subject to the TRA. In addition, if we elect to terminate the TRA early, we would be required to make an early termination payment, which upfront payment may be made significantly in advance of the anticipated future tax benefits.

 

Payments under the TRA generally will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine. Although we do not expect the Internal Revenue Service to challenge our tax reporting positions, we will not be reimbursed for any payments previously made under the TRA, but any overpayments will reduce future payments. As a result, in certain circumstances, payments could be made under the TRA in excess of the benefits that we actually realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the TRA.

 

58



Table of Contents

The full text of the TRA was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our first Form 8-K filed on February 6, 2015. While our Audit Committee did not review or approve the TRA, our full board of directors unanimously reviewed and approved the form of TRA in conjunction with the board’s approval of the Combination in August 2014.2014 by our board of directors.

 

Voting Agreement

 

The holders of a majority of the voting power of the company’s common stock (the “Stockholders”) entered into an Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, dated February 2, 2015, (thea Second Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, as of July 29, 2016, a Third Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, as of July 31, 2017, and a Fourth Amended and Restated Voting Agreement, as of February 15, 2018 (as most currently amended and restated, the “Voting Agreement”), pursuant to which they agreed that, with respect to all shares of Class A Common Stock and Class C Common Stock of which each Stockholder is the owner or otherwise holds the power to direct the vote at any particular future point in time (the “Shares”): (a) the Stockholders shall vote all of their Shares as determined by the Stockholders holding (i) with regard to the election of directors of the company, a majority of the Shares held by the Stockholders, and (ii) with regard to all other matters, at least seventy-five percent of the Shares held by the Stockholders; and (b) if, (i) with regard to any nominee for election as a director, Stockholders holding at least a majority of the Shares held by the Stockholders cannot agree, the Stockholders shall abstain or vote all of their Shares against such nominee, and (ii) with regard to all matters other than the election of directors, Stockholders holding at least seventy-five percent of the Shares held by the Stockholders cannot agree, the Stockholders shall abstain or vote all of their Shares against such matter. Accordingly, the Stockholders act as a “group,” within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, in voting on all matters, including the election of directors.

 

The shares of Class A Common Stock, Class C Common StockShares and OP units beneficially owned by the parties to the Voting Agreement represent approximately 63.4%56.5% of the outstanding shares of our Class A Common Stock on a fully as-converted and as-exchanged basis, and approximately 63.4%53.8% of the voting power of the company.

 

The full text of the Voting Agreement was filed as Exhibit 51 to the Schedule 13D13D/A filed by the Stockholders on February 12, 2015. Since16, 2018. Because neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are parties to the Voting Agreement, our Audit Committee has neither reviewed nor approved the agreement.

 

Board Observer Rights AgreementAgreements

 

The company entered into a board observer rights agreement, dated February 2, 2015, with Isaac Neuberger, the managing member of stockholders that collectively hold approximately 10.9%10.5% of the voting securities of the company on a fully as-converted and as-exchanged basis as of April 8, 2015,December 31, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Neuberger has been granted observer rights on the board of directors. The agreement provides that the company will invite Mr. Neuberger to attend, in a nonvoting observer capacity, meetings of the board of directors and Mr. Neuberger will have the right to be heard at any such meeting. The company may exclude Mr. Neuberger from access to materials or meetings under certain circumstances. The agreement provides that the company will reimburse Mr. Neuberger for reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors. The rights under the agreement will terminate if

certain entities of which Mr. Neuberger is the managing member cease to beneficially own more than five (5) percent of our class A common stock. While our Audit Committee did not review or approve the board observer rights agreement, our full board of directors unanimously approved entering into the board observer arrangement in conjunction with the board’s approval of the Combination in August, 2014.2014 by our board of directors.

The company entered into a board observer rights agreement, dated October 10, 2017, with Steve Fishman, the managing member of stockholders that collectively hold approximately 11.3% of the voting securities of the company on a fully as-converted and as-exchanged basis as of December 31, 2017, pursuant to which Mr. Fishman has been granted observer rights on the board of directors. The agreement provides that the company will invite Mr. Fishman to attend, in a nonvoting observer capacity, meetings of the board of directors and Mr. Fishman will have the right to be heard at any such meeting. The company may exclude Mr. Fishman from access to materials or meetings under certain circumstances. The agreement provides that the company will reimburse Mr. Fishman for reasonable and documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the board of directors. The rights under the agreement will terminate upon written notice to Mr. Fishman. Our Governance Committee and full Board reviewed and approved the board observer rights agreement with Mr. Fishman.

 

Service Agreements with Subsidiaries of FC PAC Holdings, LLC

 

Some of the company’s healthcare centers have entered into agreements, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, with companies that are owned indirectly by FC PAC Holdings, LLC (“FC PAC”). Pursuant to those agreements, such companies provide hospice, mobile radiology and laboratory/diagnostic services to approximately 130, 325425 and 170180 of the company’s centers, respectively. Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC PAC totaling less than 10% in the aggregate. Until March 31, 2015, a subsidiary of Genesis also indirectly held ownership interests in FC PAC and was a party to certain joint venture agreements related thereto with Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman or entities controlled by such individuals. We are unable to estimate the approximate dollar amount of these transactions because, depending upon the circumstances of each transaction, payments may be made by the center to the provider, by the provider to the center or by a third party payor to the provider or the center. As of March 31, 2015,April 26, 2018, neither Genesis nor any of its subsidiaries directly or indirectly owns any ownership interest in FC PAC. Our Audit Committee did not review or approve

Hospice and Home Health Sale

Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC Compassus LLC (“FC Compassus”) totaling less than 10% in the aggregate.  On May 1, 2016, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, the company sold the hospice and home health businesses that were operated by subsidiaries of the company to FC Compassus for a purchase price of $84.0 million.  The purchase price was paid $72.0 million in cash and $12.0 million by the delivery to the company of a promissory note.   On May 1, 2016, the Company entered into preferred provider and affiliation agreements with FC Compassus.  Fees for these agreements.services amounted to $11.8 million, $12.2 million and $12.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.   The combined note and accrued interest balance of $15.6 million remains outstanding at December 31, 2017.

 

Therapy Agreements with Centers Operated by Consulate Healthcare

 

Genesis Rehabilitation Services (“GRS”), a subsidiary of the company, has entered into approximately 180 agreements, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, with healthcare centers operated by Consulate Health Care (“Consulate”) pursuant to which GRS provides therapy and respiratory services to such centers. Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman indirectly hold ownership interests in Lavie Care Centers, LLC, the parent company of Consulate. InConsulate Health Care (“Consulate”).  Genesis Rehabilitation Services (“GRS”), a subsidiary of the aggregate, Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman beneficially own a majority of the

59



Table of Contents

ownership interests of Consulate. While it is difficult to estimate the approximate dollar amount of these transactions, it is possible that the aggregate dollar amount of payments to GRS for these transactions during 2014 was more than $150 million. Our Audit Committee did not review or approve these agreements.

Ownership Interest in National Home Care Holdings, LLC

The company, holds an approximate 6.8% ownership interest in National Home Care Holdings, LLC (doing business as Millennium Home Care, “NHCH”) and Messrs. Fishman, Whitman, Reis and Hartman hold, directly or indirectly, an ownership interest in NHCH totaling less than 10% in the aggregate. The company is a party to certain joint venture agreements with Messrs. Fishman, Whitman, Reis and Hartman regarding NHCH. GRS has entered into a therapy services agreement with NHCHagreements, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, with healthcare centers operated by Consulate pursuant to which GRS providedprovides therapy and respiratory services to NHCH in ansuch centers. GRS currently serves approximately 145 Consulate centers.  While it is difficult to determine the approximate dollar amount of $250,000these transactions, we estimate that that the aggregate billings by GRS for these services during 2017 was $142.2 million, and GRS collected approximately $130.8 million.  In addition, Consulate comprises $87.0 million, approximately 54%, of the outstanding contract receivables in 2014. Our Audit Committee did not review or approve these agreements.the rehabilitation services business at December 31, 2017.  In the year ended December 31, 2017, we recorded customer receivership and other related charges of $55 million associated with Consulate.

 

Facility Lease

 

A subsidiary of the company entered into a lease, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, pursuant to which it leases one centertwo centers in Alabama from Glenwood Realty. Messrs. Hartman, Fishman and Whitman directly or indirectly hold ownership interests in Glenwood Realty totaling approximately 39% in the aggregate. The annualized rent paid to the landlord is currently approximately $1.4$1.7 million.  Our Audit Committee did not review or approve this lease.

ProStep Acquisition

On July 1, 2015, in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms, a subsidiary of the company acquired 21 out-patient therapy clinics from FC Domino Acquisition, LLC (“FC Domino”) in exchange for a $1.0 million promissory note

that bears interest at 5%.  Messrs. Fishman, Hartman, Neuberger, Reis and Whitman indirectly beneficially hold ownership interests in FC Domino totaling less than 10% in the aggregate.

 

Indemnification Agreements

 

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors containing provisions that may require us, among other things, to indemnify them against certain liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors.

 

We believe that all of these related party transactions were either on terms at least as favorable to us as could have been obtained through arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties or, if the transactions were negotiated in connection with acquisitions, the overall terms of whichsuch acquisitions were as favorable to us as could have been obtained through arm’s-length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

60



Table of Contents

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

We know of no other matters that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting. If any other business properly comes before the annual meeting, it is the intention of the proxy holders to vote the shares they represent as the board of directors may recommend. Discretionary authority with respect to such other business is expressly granted by the completion of the enclosed proxy card. The proxy holders will vote at their discretion on any procedural matters that may come before the meeting.

 

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations

 

Proposals Pursuant to Rule 14a-8.14a-8

 

Pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), stockholders may present proper proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement and for consideration at our next annual meeting of stockholders if they satisfy certain requirements as specified in the rule. While our board of directors will consider stockholder proposals for inclusion in our proxy statement, we reserve the right to omit from our proxy statement stockholder proposals that we are not required to include under the Exchange Act, including Rule 14a-8. Nothing in our bylaws affects any rights of stockholders to request inclusion of proposals in our proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8. Any stockholder desiring to present a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders must deliver the proposal to the Corporate Secretary by December 26, 2015.27, 2018.

 

Stockholder Proposals

 

In addition to any other applicable requirements, forFor business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must, pursuantin addition to our bylaws, which were most recently amended and restated on February 2, 2015, have givenany other applicable requirements, give timely notice thereof in proper written form to our Corporate Secretary.Secretary pursuant to our bylaws. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be delivered to or be mailed and received at our principal executive office not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within twenty-five (25) days before or after the anniversary date of the preceding annual meeting, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever occurs first. In no event will the adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting, or the public announcement of such an adjournment or postponement, commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. If our 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders is held within twenty-five (25) days before or after June 3, 2016,6, 2019, to be timely a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive office between February 4, 20166, 2019 and March 5, 2016.8, 2019.

 

To be in proper written form, a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must include all of the applicable information required to be in such notices under our bylaws. A stockholder providing notice of business proposed to be brought before an annual meeting must further update and supplement such notice, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice pursuant to the company’s bylaws is true and correct as of the date of the annual meeting and such update and supplement must be delivered to or be mailed and received by the Corporate Secretary at the principal executive office of the company prior to the annual meeting.

 

Stockholder Nominations of Directors

 

Pursuant to our bylaws, only persons who are nominated in accordance with the following procedures are eligible for election as directors of the company, except as may be otherwise provided in our certificate of incorporation with respect to the right of holders of preferred stock of the company to nominate and elect a specified number of directors in certain circumstances. Nominations of persons for election to the board of directors may be made at any annual meeting of

stockholders, or at any special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, (i) by or at the direction of the board of directors (or any duly authorized committee thereof) or (ii) by any stockholder of the company (A) who is a stockholder of record on the date of the giving of the notice provided for in the bylaws and on the record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting or special meeting and (B) who complies with the notice procedures set forth in the bylaws.

 

In addition to any other applicable requirements, for a nomination to be made by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to our Corporate Secretary. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be delivered to or be mailed and received at our principal executive office (i) in the case of an annual meeting, not less than ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the anniversary date of the

61



Table of Contents

immediately preceding annual Meeting of stockholders; provided, however, that if the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within twenty-five (25) days before or after the anniversary date, notice by the stockholder in order to be timely must be so received not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which the notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever occurs first and (ii) in the case of a special meeting of stockholders called for the purpose of electing directors, not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which notice of the date of the special meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the date of the special meeting was made, whichever occurs first. In no event will the adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting or a special meeting called for the purpose of electing directors, or the public announcement of such an adjournment or postponement, commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a stockholder’s notice as described above. If our 20162019 annual meeting of stockholders is held within twenty-five (25) days before or after June 3, 2016,6, 2019, to be timely a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must be delivered to or mailed and received at our principal executive office between February 4, 20166, 2019 and March 5, 2016.8, 2019.

 

To be in proper written form, a stockholder’s notice to the Corporate Secretary must include all of the applicable information required to be in such notices under our bylaws. A stockholder providing notice of any nomination proposed to be made at an annual meeting or special meeting must further update and supplement such notice, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice pursuant to our bylaws is true and correct as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting or special meeting, and the update and supplement must be delivered to or be mailed and received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive office not later than five (5) business days after the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to receive notice of the annual meeting or special meeting.

 

No person will be eligible for election as a director of the company unless nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws. If the chairperson of the meeting determines that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures set forth in our bylaws, the chairman must declare to the meeting that the nomination was defective and the defective nomination must be disregarded.

 

General

 

You may write to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive office, 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348, to deliver the notices discussed above and for a copy of the relevant bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making stockholder proposals and nominating director candidates pursuant to our bylaws. Our bylaws are available, free of charge, on the corporate governance page in the investor relations section of our website at www.genesishcc.com.

 

Householding of Proxy Materials

 

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements, annual reports and other proxy materials (including Internet Availability Notices) with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

 

A number of banks and brokers with account holders who are our stockholders will be householding our proxy materials this year. A single set of proxy materials will be delivered to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate set of proxy materials, please notify your bank or broker, direct your written request to Genesis Healthcare, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 101 East State Street, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348, or contact the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. Investor Relations department at investorrelations@genesishcc.com or (610) 925-2000. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker.

Incorporation by Reference

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of our previous filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, which might incorporate future filings made by us under those statutes, neither the preceding Compensation Committee Report nor the Audit Committee Report included in this proxy statement will be incorporated by reference into any of those prior filings, nor will any such report be incorporated by reference into any future filings made by us under those statutes, except to the extent we specifically incorporate such reports by reference therein. In addition, information on our website, other than our

62



Table of Contents

proxy statement, notice and form of proxy, is not part of the proxy soliciting material and is not incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

 

GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC.

 

 

Michael S. Sherman

 

Senior Vice President, General Counsel,

 

Secretary and Assistant Treasurer

 

6342



Table of Contents

Exhibit A

GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC.
2015 OMNIBUS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

Section 1. Purpose of Plan.

The nameIf you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, 123,456,789,012.12345 TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. For All Withhold All For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the Plan is the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan. The purposes of the Plan are to provide an additional incentive to selected employees, directors, independent contractors and consultants of the Company or its Affiliates whose contributions are essential to the growth and success of the Company’s business, in order to strengthen the commitment of such persons to the Company and its Subsidiaries, motivate such persons to faithfully and diligently perform their responsibilities and attract and retain competent and dedicated persons whose efforts will result in the long-term growth and profitability of the Company. To accomplish such purposes, the Plan provides that the Company may grant Options, Share Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Other Share-Based Awards, Cash Awards or any combination of the foregoing.

Section 2. Definitions.

For purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall be defined as set forth below:

(a) “Administrator” means the Board, or, if and to the extent the Board does not administer the Plan, the Committee in accordance with Section 3 hereof.

(b) “Affiliate” means a Person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the Person specified. An entity shall be deemed an Affiliate of the Company for purposes of this definition only for such periods as the requisite ownership or control relationship is maintained. In addition, FC-GEN and all of its affiliates shall be deemed an affiliate of the Company.

(c) “Applicable Laws” means the applicable requirements under U.S. federal and state corporate laws, U.S. federal and state securities laws, including the Code, any stock exchange or quotation system on which the Common Stock is listed or quoted and the applicable laws of any other country or jurisdiction where Awards are granted under the Plan, as are in effect from time to time.

(d) “Award” means any Option, Share Appreciation Right, Restricted Share, Restricted Stock Unit, Other Share-Based Award or Cash Award granted under the Plan.

(e) “Award Agreement” means any written agreement, contract or other instrument or document evidencing an Award.

(f) “Beneficial Owner” (or any variant thereof) has the meaning defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.

(g) “Board” means the Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Robert H. Fish 02 George V. Hager, Jr. 03 Arnold Whitman The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. 2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the Company.

(h) “Bylaws” meancompensation of our named executive officers. For 0 0 Against 0 0 Abstain 0 0 3. To ratify the bylawsselection of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the Company,fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. NOTE: Such other business as may be amended and/or restated from time to time.

(i) “Cash Award” means cash awarded under Section 11 ofproperly come before the Plan, including cash awarded as a bonus or upon the attainment of Performance Goals or otherwise as permitted under the Plan.

(j) “Cause” shall have the meaning assigned to such term in any individual employment or severance agreement or Award Agreement with the Participant or, if no such agreement exists or if such agreement does not define “Cause,” Cause means (i)  conviction of, or plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, by the Participant to any felony (whether or not involving the Companymeeting or any other member of the Company Group, as defined below) or any other crime involving moral turpitude which subjects, or if generally known, would subject, any member of the Company Group to public ridicule or embarrassment, (ii) fraud or other willful misconduct in respect of Participant’s duties of the office held by Participant, or (ii) Participant’s continued willful and intentional failure to substantially comply with the reasonable mandates of the Company commensurate with his/her position after a written demandadjournment thereof. (see reverse for substantial compliance is delivered to him/her by the Company, which demand specifically identifies the mandate(s) with which the Company believes he/she has not substantially complied, and which failure is not substantially corrected by him/her within 10 days after receipt of such demand. Any voluntary

A-1



Table of Contents

termination of Employment by the Participant in anticipation of an involuntary termination of the Participant’s employment for Cause shall be deemed to be a termination for Cause.

(k)  “Change in Capitalization” means any (i) merger, amalgamation, consolidation, reclassification, recapitalization, spin-off, spin-out, repurchase or other reorganization or corporate transaction or event, (ii) special or extraordinary dividend or other extraordinary distribution (whether in the form of cash, Common Stock or other property), stock split, reverse stock split, share subdivision or consolidation, (iii) combination or exchange of shares or (iv) other change in corporate structure, which, in any such case, the Administrator determines, in its sole discretion, affects the Shares such that an adjustment pursuant to Section 5 hereof is appropriate.

(l) “Change in Control” means Change in Control of the Company or Change in Control of FC-GEN. Notwithstanding the foregoing, for each Award that constitutes deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code, and to the extent required to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, a Change in Control shall be deemed to have occurred under the Plan with respect to such Award only if a change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or FC-GEN, as applicable, or a change in ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company or FC-GEN, as applicable, shall also be deemed to have occurred under Section 409A of the Code.

(m) “Change in Control of the Company” means an event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs shall have occurred:

(1) any Person is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such Person or any securities acquired directly from the Company or any Affiliate thereof) representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities, excluding any Person who becomes such a Beneficial Owner in connection with a transaction described in clause (i) of paragraph (3) below; or

(2) there is consummated a merger or consolidation of the Company or any direct or indirect Subsidiary with any other corporation or other entity, other than (i) a merger or consolidation which results in (A) the voting securities of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof), in combination with the ownership of any trusteeinstructions) Yes No Investor Address Line 3 John Sample attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, holding securities under an employee benefitplease give full ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 02 0000000000 1 OF 1 1 2 0000371494_1 R1.0.1.17 For address change/comments, mark here. 0 Please indicate if you plan of the Company or any Subsidiary, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation and (B) the directors then still in office who either were directors on the date hereof or whose appointment, election or nomination for election was previously so approved or recommended (“Incumbent Directors”) continuing immediately thereafter to represent at leastattend this meeting00 Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a majority of the board of directors of the Company, the entity surviving such merger or consolidation or, if the Company or the entity surviving such merger or consolidation is then a Subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof, or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no Person is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company (not including in the securities Beneficially Owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates) representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; or

(3) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, other than (A) a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity, at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned by stockholders of the Company following the completion of such transaction in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company immediately prior to such sale or (B) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which such assets are sold or disposed or, if such entity is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control of the Company shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the holders of Common Stock immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same proportionate ownership in an entity which owns all or substantially all of the assets of the Company immediately following such transaction or series of transactions.

(n) “Change in Control of FC-GEN” means an event set forth in any one of the following paragraphs shall have occurred:

A-2



Table of Contents

(1) any Person (other than the Company or its Affiliate) is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of FC-GEN (not including in the securities beneficially owned by such Person or any securities acquired directly from the Company or any Affiliate thereof) representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of FC-GEN’s, as applicable, then outstanding securities, excluding any Person who becomes such a Beneficial Owner in connection with a transaction described in clause (i) of paragraph (3) below; or

(2) there is consummated a merger or consolidation of FC-GEN with any other corporation or other entity (other than the Company or any of its Affiliates), other than (i) a merger or consolidation which results in (A) the voting securities of FC-GEN, as applicable, outstanding immediately prior to such merger or consolidation continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company, FC-GEN or any Subsidiary thereof, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the securities of FC-GEN, as applicable, such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation and (B) the Incumbent Directors continuing immediately thereafter to represent at least a majority of the board of directors of the Company, the entity surviving such merger or consolidation or, if FC-GEN or the entity surviving such merger or consolidation is then a Subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof, or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement a recapitalization of FC-GEN (or similar transaction) in which no Person is or becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of securities of FC-GEN (not including in the securities Beneficially Owned by such Person any securities acquired directly from the Company or its Affiliates) representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s or FC-GEN’s then outstanding securities; or

(3) the equity holders of FC-GEN approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of FC-GEN or there is consummated an agreement for the sale or disposition by FC-GEN of all or substantially all of FC-GEN’s assets, other than (A) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of FC-GEN’s assets to an entity, at least fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the voting securities of which are owned directly or indirectly by direct or indirect equityholders of the Company and FC-GEN following the completion of such transaction in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of the Company and FC-GEN immediately prior to such sale or (B) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of FC-GEN’s assets immediately following which the individuals who comprise the Board immediately prior thereto constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of the entity to which such assets are sold or disposed or, if such entity is a subsidiary, the ultimate parent thereof.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) a Change in Control of FC-GEN shall not be deemed to have occurred by virtue of the consummation of any transaction or series of integrated transactions immediately following which the holders of Common Stock and equity securities of FC-GEN (other than the Company) immediately prior to such transaction or series of transactions continue to have substantially the same direct or indirect proportionate ownership in an entity which, directly or indirectly, owns all or substantially all of the assets of FC-GEN immediately following such transaction or series of transactions and (ii) direct or indirect acquisition of additional equity interest in FC-GEN by the Company shall not result in a Change in Control.

(o) “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, or any successor thereto.

(p) “Committee” means any committee or subcommittee the Board may appoint to administer the Plan. Subject to the discretion of the Board, the Committee shall be composed entirely of individuals who meet the qualifications of an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code (but only to the extent necessary and desirable to maintain qualification of Awards as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code), a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act and any other qualifications required by the applicable stock exchange on which the Common Stock is traded. If at any time or to any extent the Board shall not administer the Plan, then the functions of the Administrator specified in the Plan shall be exercised by the Committee. Except as otherwise provided in the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Company, any action of the Committee with respect to the administration of the Plan shall be taken by a majority vote at a meeting at which a quorum is duly constituted or unanimous written consent of the Committee’s members.

(q) “Common Stock” means the common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company.

(r) “Company” means Genesis Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation (or any successor company, except as the term “Company” is used in the definition of “Change in Control” above).

(s) “Covered Employee” has the meaning ascribed to the term “covered employee” set forth in Section 162(m) of the Code.

A-3



Table of Contents

(t) “Disability” means, with respect to any Participant, that such Participant (i) as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion, is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, or (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three (3) months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company or an Affiliate thereof.

(u) “Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 19 hereof.

(v) “Eligible Recipient” means an employee, director, independent contractor or consultant of the Company or any Affiliate of the Company who has been selected as an eligible participant by the Administrator; provided, however, to the extent required to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, an Eligible Recipient of an Option or a Stock Appreciation Right means an employee, non-employee director, independent contractor or consultant of the Company or any Affiliate of the Company with respect to whom the Company is an “eligible issuer of service recipient stock” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code.

(w) “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time.

(x) “Exercise Price” means, with respect to any Option, the per share price at which a holder of such Option may purchase Shares issuable upon exercise of such Award, and, with respect to a Share Appreciation Right, the base price per share of such Share Appreciation Right, which, with respect to Options and Share Appreciation Rights, in any event will not be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a related share of Common Stock on the date of grant.

(y) “Fair Market Value” of a share of Common Stock or another security as of a particular date shall mean the fair market value as determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion; provided, however, (i) if the Common Stock or other security is admitted to trading on a national securities exchange, the fair market value on any date shall be the closing sale price reported on such date, or if no shares were traded on such date, on the last preceding date for which there was a sale of a share of Common Stock on such exchange, or (ii) if the Common Stock or other security is then traded in an over-the-counter market, the fair market value on any date shall be the average of the closing bid and asked prices for such share in such over-the-counter market for the last preceding date on which there was a sale of such share in such market.

(z) “FC-GEN” means FC-GEN Operations Investment LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company.

(aa) “ISO” means an Option intended to be and designated as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code.

(bb) “Nonqualified Stock Option” shall mean an Option that is not designated as an ISO.

(cc) “Option”  means an option to purchase shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to Section 7 hereof.  The term “Option” as used in the Plan includes the terms “Nonqualified Stock Option” and “ISO.”

(dd) “Other Share-Based Award” means a right or other interest granted pursuant to Section 10 hereof that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to, the Common Stock, including, but not limited to, unrestricted Shares, restricted stock units, dividend equivalents or performance units, each of which may be subject to the attainment of Performance Goals or a period of continued employment or other terms or conditions as permitted under the Plan.

(ee) “Participant” means any Eligible Recipient selected by the Administrator, pursuant to the Administrator’s authority provided for in Section 3 below, to receive grants of Awards, and, upon his or her death, his or her successors, heirs, executors and administrators, as the case may be.

(ff) “Performance Goals” means performance goals based on one or more of the following criteria: (i) earnings, including one or more of operating income, net operating income, earnings before or after taxes, earnings before or after interest, depreciation, amortization, adjusted EBITDA, economic earnings, or extraordinary or special items or book value per share (which may exclude nonrecurring items); (ii) pre-tax income or after-tax income; (iii) earnings per share (basic or diluted); (iv) operating profit; (v) revenue, revenue growth or rate of revenue growth; (vi) return on assets (gross or net), return on investment, return on capital, or return on equity; (vii) returns on sales or revenues; (viii) operating expenses; (ix) share price appreciation; (x) cash flow, cash flow per share, free cash flow, cash flow return on investment (discounted or otherwise), net cash provided by operations, or cash flow in excess of cost of capital; (xi) implementation or completion of critical projects

A-4



Table of Contents

or processes; (xii) cumulative earnings per share growth; (xiii) operating margin or profit margin; (xiv) cost targets, reductions and savings, productivity and efficiencies; (xv) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion, customer satisfaction, quality of patient care, employee satisfaction, human resources management, supervision of litigation, information technology, and goals relating to acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures and similar transactions, and budget comparisons; (xvi) personal professional objectives, including any of the foregoing performance goals, the implementation of policies and plans, the negotiation of transactions, the development of long term business goals, formation of joint ventures, research or development collaborations, and the completion of other corporate transactions; (xvii) any combination of, or a specified increase in, any of the foregoing, (xviii) economic value created; and (xix) share price or total shareholder return.  Where applicable, the Performance Goals may be expressed in terms of attaining a specified level of the particular criteria or the attainment of a percentage increase or decrease in the particular criteria, and may be applied to one or more of the Company or any Affiliate thereof, or a division or strategic business unit of the Company or any Affiliate thereof, or may be applied to the performance of the Company relative to a market index, a group of other companies or a combination thereof, all as determined by the Committee. The Performance Goals may include a threshold level of performance below which no payment shall be made (or no vesting shall occur), levels of performance at which specified payments shall be made (or specified vesting shall occur), and a maximum level of performance above which no additional payment shall be made (or at which full vesting shall occur). Each of the foregoing Performance Goals shall be determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (to the extent applicable) and shall be subject to certification by the Committee; provided, that, to the extent permitted by Section 162(m) of the Code to the extent applicable, the Committee shall make equitable adjustments to the Performance Goals in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting the Company or any Affiliate thereof or the financial statements of the Company or any Affiliate thereof, in response to changes in Applicable Laws or regulations, or to account for items of gain, loss or expense determined to be extraordinary or unusual in nature or infrequent in occurrence or related to the disposal of a segment of a business or related to a change in accounting principles.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall take any actions pursuant to this paragraph to the extent necessary and desirable to maintain qualification of Awards as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

(gg) “Person” shall have the meaning given in Section 3(a)(9) of the Exchange Act, as modified and used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) thereof, except that such term shall not include (i) the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, (ii) a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof, (iii) an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, or (iv) a corporation owned, directly or indirectly, by the stockholders of the Company in substantially the same proportions as their ownership of shares of the Company.

(hh) “Plan” means this 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.

(ii) “Restricted Shares” means Shares granted pursuant to Section 9 below subject to certain restrictions that lapse at the end of a specified period (or periods) and/or upon attainment of specified performance objectives.

(jj) “Restricted Stock Unit” means the right granted pursuant to Section 9 hereof to receive a Share at the end of a specified restricted period (or periods) of time and/or upon attainment of specified performance objectives.

(kk) “Shares” means Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan, as adjusted pursuant to the Plan, and any successor (pursuant to a merger, amalgamation, consolidation or other reorganization) security.

(ll) “Share Appreciation Right” means the right pursuant to an Award granted under Section 8 below to receive an amount equal to the excess, if any, of (i) the aggregate Exercise Price, as of the date such Award or portion thereof is surrendered, of the Shares covered by such Award or such portion thereof, over (ii) the aggregate Exercise Price of such Award or such portion thereof.

(mm) “Subsidiary” means, with respect to any Person, as of any date of determination, any other Person as to which such first Person owns or otherwise controls, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting shares or other similar interests or a sole general partner interest or managing member or similar interest of such other Person. An entity shall be deemed a Subsidiary of the Company for purposes of this definition only for such periods as the requisite ownership or control relationship is maintained.

Section 3. Administration.

(a) The Plan shall be administered by the Administrator and shall be administered in accordance with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code (but only to the extent necessary and desirable to maintain qualification of Awards as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code) and, to the extent applicable, Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 16b-3”).

A-5



Table of Contents

(b) Pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Administrator, subject, in the case of any Committee, to any restrictions on the authority delegated to it by the Board, shall have the power and authority, without limitation:

(1) to select those Eligible Recipients who shall be Participants;

(2) to determine whether and to what extent Options, Share Appreciation Rights, Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units, Cash Awards, Other Share-Based Awards or a combination of any of the foregoing, are to be granted hereunder to Participants;

(3) to determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;

(4) to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, of each Award granted hereunder (including, but not limited to, (i) the restrictions applicable to Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units and the conditions under which restrictions applicable to such Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units shall lapse, (ii) the performance goals and periods applicable to Awards, (iii) the Exercise Price of each Award, (iv) the vesting schedule applicable to each Award, (v) the number of Shares or amount of cash or other property subject to each Award and (vi) subject to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code (to the extent applicable), any amendments to the terms and conditions of outstanding Awards, including, but not limited to, extending the exercise period of such Awards and accelerating the vesting schedule of such Awards);

(5) to determine the terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, which shall govern all written instruments evidencing Awards;

(6) to determine the Fair Market Value in accordance with the terms of the Plan;

(7) to determine the duration and purpose of leaves of absence which may be granted to a Participant without constituting termination of the Participant’s employment for purposes of Awards granted under the Plan;

(8) to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules, regulations, guidelines and practices governing the Plan as it shall from time to time deem advisable;

(9) to construe and interpret the terms and provisions of, and supply or correct omissions in, the Plan and any Award issued under the Plan (and any Award Agreement relating thereto), and to otherwise supervise the administration of the Plan and to exercise all powers and authorities either specifically granted under the Plan or necessary and advisable in the administration of the Plan; and

(10) to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to sub-plans established for the purpose of satisfying applicable foreign laws or for qualifying for favorable tax treatment under applicable foreign laws, which rules and regulations may be set forth in an appendix or appendixes to the Plan.

(c) Subject to Section 5, neither the Board nor the Committee shall have the authority to reprice or cancel and regrant any Award at a lower exercise, base or purchase price or cancel any Award with an exercise, base or purchase price in exchange for cash, property or other Awards without first obtaining the approval of the Company’s shareholders.

(d) All decisions made by the Administrator pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final, conclusive and binding on all persons, including the Company and the Participants. No member of the Board or the Committee, nor any officer or employee of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof acting on behalf of the Board or the Committee, shall be personally liable for any action, omission, determination or interpretation taken or made in good faith with respect to the Plan, and all members of the Board or the Committee and each and any officer or employee of the Company and of any Subsidiary thereof acting on their behalf shall, to the maximum extent permitted by law, be fully indemnified and protected by the Company in respect of any such action, omission, determination or interpretation.

Section 4. Shares Reserved for Issuance Under the Plan.

(a) Subject to Section 5 hereof, the number of Shares of Common Stock that are reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (i) 19,000,000 Shares, (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance, but with respect to which awards have not been made, under the Amended and Restated Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Award Plan (the “Prior Plan); and (iii) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to awards outstanding on the Effective Date under the Prior Plan, which, in each case, are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the

A-6



Table of Contents

Participant.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, shares of Common Stock surrendered or withheld under the Prior Plan as payment of either the exercise price of an award (including shares of Common Stock otherwise underlying an award of a share appreciation right that are retained by the Company to account for the exercise price of such share appreciation right) and/or withholding taxes in respect of an award shall not be reserved for issuance under the Plan. Upon the Effective Date, no further awards shall be made under the Prior Plan.

(b) Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, and subject to the adjustment as provided by Section 5, from and after such time as the Plan is subject to 162(m) of the Code:

(1) No individual (including an individual who is likely to be a Covered Employee) will be granted Options or Share Appreciation rights in in excess of 2,000,000 Shares during any single fiscal year.

(2) No individual (including an individual who is likely to be a Covered employee) will be granted Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units or Other Share-Based Awards in excess of 1,000,000 Shares during any single fiscal year.

(3) The maximum Cash Award that any Covered Employee may receive with respect to a Cash Award in respect of any annual performance period is $2,500,000 and for any other performance period, such amount multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months in the performance period and the denominator of which is twelve.

(c) Shares issued under the Plan may, in whole or in part, be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares that shall have been or may be reacquired by the Company in the open market, in private transactions or otherwise. If any Shares subject to an Award are forfeited, cancelled, exchanged or surrendered or if an Award otherwise terminates or expires without a distribution of shares to the Participant, the Shares with respect to such Award shall, to the extent of any such forfeiture, cancellation, exchange, surrender, termination or expiration, again be available for Awards under the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Shares surrendered or withheld as payment of either the Exercise Price of an Award (including Shares otherwise underlying an Award of a Share Appreciation Right that are retained by the Company to account for the Exercise Price of such Share Appreciation Right) and/or withholding taxes in respect of an Award shall no longer be available for grant under the Plan.  In addition, (i) to the extent an Award is denominated in shares of Common Stock, but paid or settled in cash, the number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which such payment or settlement is made shall again be available for grants of Awards pursuant to the Plan and (ii) shares of Common Stock underlying Awards that can only be settled in cash shall not be counted against the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock available for Awards under the Plan.

(d) No more than 8,500,000 Shares shall be issued pursuant to the exercise of ISOs.

Section 5. Equitable Adjustments.

In the event of any Change in Capitalization, an equitable substitution or proportionate adjustment shall be made in (i) the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 4 and the maximum number of Shares that may be subject to Awards granted to any Participant in any calendar or fiscal year, (ii) the kind, number of securities subject to, and Exercise Price subject to outstanding Options and Share Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan, and (iii) the kind, number and purchase price of Shares or other securities or the amount of cash or amount or type of other property subject to outstanding Restricted Shares, Restricted Stock Units or Other Share-Based Awards granted under the Plan; provided, however, that any fractional shares resulting from the adjustment shall be eliminated. Such other equitable substitutions or adjustments shall be made as may be determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in connection with a Change in Capitalization, the Administrator may provide, in its sole discretion, but subject in all events to the requirements of Section 409A of the Code, for the cancellation of any outstanding Award granted hereunder in exchange for payment in cash or other property having an aggregate Fair Market Value of the Shares covered by such Award, reduced by the aggregate Exercise Price or purchase price thereof, if any; provided, however, that if the Exercise Price or purchase price of any outstanding Award is equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock, cash or other property covered by such Award, the Board may cancel such Award without the payment of any consideration to the Participant.  Further, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, with respect to Awards subject to foreign laws, adjustments made hereunder shall be made in compliance with applicable requirements.  Except to the extent determined by the Administrator, any adjustments to ISOs under this Section 5 shall be made only to the extent not constituting a “modification” within the meaning of Section 424(h)(3) of the Code.  The Administrator’s determinations pursuant to this Section 5 shall be final, binding and conclusive.

A-7



Table of Contents

Section 6. Eligibility.

The Participants under the Plan shall be selected from time to time by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, from those individuals that qualify as Eligible Recipients, provided, however, that no non-employee director under the Plan shall be granted Awards in any consecutive 12-month period in respect of Shares having a Fair Market Value of more than $750,000, as measured as of the applicable grant date.

Section 7. Options.

(a) General.  Options granted under the Plan shall be designated as Nonqualified Stock Options or ISOs.  Each Participant who is granted an Option shall enter into an Award Agreement with the Company, containing such terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, which Award Agreement shall set forth, among other things, the Exercise Price of the Option, the term of the Option and provisions regarding exercisability of the Option, and whether the Option is intended to be an ISO or a Nonqualified Stock Option (and in the event the Award Agreement has no such designation, the Option shall be a Nonqualified Stock Option).  The provisions of each Option need not be the same with respect to each Participant.  More than one Option may be granted to the same Participant and be outstanding concurrently hereunder. Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section 7 and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator shall deem desirable and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

(b) Exercise Price. The Exercise Price of Shares purchasable under an Option shall be determined by the Administrator in its sole discretion at the time of grant, but in no event shall the exercise price of an Option be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on the date of grant.

(c) Option Term. The maximum term of each Option shall be fixed by the Administrator, but no Option shall be exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date such Option is granted. Each Option’s term is subject to earlier expiration pursuant to the applicable provisions in the Plan and the Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator shall have the authority to accelerate the exercisability of any outstanding Option at such time and under such circumstances as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.

(d) Exercisability. Each Option shall be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions, including the attainment of pre-established performance goals, as shall be determined by the Administrator in the applicable Award Agreement. The Administrator may also provide that any Option shall be exercisable only in installments, and the Administrator may waive such installment exercise provisions at any time, in whole or in part, based on such factors as the Administrator may determine in its sole discretion. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, an Option may not be exercised for a fraction of a share.

(e) Method of Exercise. Options may be exercised in whole or in part by giving written notice of exercise to the Company specifying the number of whole Shares to be purchased, accompanied by paymentpartnership, please sign in full of the aggregate Exercise Price of the Shares so purchased in cashcorporate or its equivalent, as determined by the Administrator. As determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, with respect to any Option or category of Options, payment in whole or in part may also be made (i) by means of consideration received under any cashless exercise procedure approved by the Administrator (including the withholding of Shares otherwise issuable upon exercise), (ii) in the form of unrestricted Shares already owned by the Participant which have a Fair Market Value on the date of surrender equal to the aggregate exercise price of the Shares as to which such Option shall be exercised, (iii) any other form of consideration approved by the Administrator and permitted by Applicable Laws or (iv) any combination of the foregoing.

(f) ISOs. The terms and conditions of ISOs granted hereunder shall be subject to the provisions of Section 422 of the Code and the terms, conditions, limitations and administrative procedures established by the Administrator from time to time in accordance with the Plan.  At the discretion of the Administrator, ISOs may be granted only to an employee of the Company, its “parent corporation” (as such term is defined in Section 424(e) of the Code) or a Subsidiary.

(1) ISO Grants to 10% Stockholders.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, if an ISO is granted to a Participant who owns shares representing more than ten percent (10%) of the voting power of all classes of shares of the Company, its “parent corporation” (as such term is defined in Section 424(e) of the Code) or a Subsidiary, the term of the ISO shall not exceed five (5) years from the time of grant of such ISO and the Exercise Price shall be at least one hundred and ten percent (110%) of the Fair Market Value of the Shares on the date of grant.

(2) $100,000 Per Year Limitation For ISOs.  To the extent the aggregate Fair Market Value (determined on the date of grant) of the Shares for which ISOs are exercisable for the first time by any Participant during any

A-8



Table of Contents

calendar year (under all plans of the Company) exceeds $100,000, such excess ISOs shall be treated as Nonqualified Stock Options.

(3) Disqualifying Dispositions.  Each Participant awarded an ISO under the Plan shall notify the Company in writing immediately after the date he or she makes a “disqualifying disposition” of any Share acquired pursuant to the exercise of such ISO.  A “disqualifying disposition” is any disposition (including any sale) of such Shares before the later of (i) two years after the date of grant of the ISO and (ii) one year after the date the Participant acquired the Shares by exercising the ISO.  The Company may, if determined by the Administrator and in accordance with procedures established by it, retain possession of any Shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of an ISO as agent for the applicable Participant until the end of the period described in the preceding sentence, subject to complying with any instructions from such Participant as to the sale of such shares.

(g) Rights as Stockholder. A Participant shall have no rights to dividends, dividend equivalents or distributions or any other rights of a stockholder with respect to the Shares subject to an Option until the Participant has given written notice of the exercise thereof, and has paid in full for such Shares and has satisfied the requirements of Section 16 hereof.

(h) Termination of Employment or Service.  Unless otherwise provided by the Committee or in the applicable Award Agreement:

(1) In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and all Affiliates thereof (including by reason of the Participant’s employer ceasing to be an Affiliate of the Company) shall terminate for any reason other than Cause, Disability, or death, (A) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they are exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the date that is ninety (90) days after such termination, on which date they shall expire, and (B) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were not exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of its term.

(2) In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and all Affiliates thereof shall terminate on account of the Disability or death of the Participant, (A) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the date that is six (6) months after such termination, on which date they shall expire and (B) Options granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were not exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Option shall be exercisable after the expiration of its term.

(3) In the event of the termination of a Participant’s employment or service for Cause, all outstanding Options granted to such Participant shall expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination.

(i) Other Change in Employment Status. An Option shall be affected, both with regard to vesting schedule and termination, by leaves of absence, including unpaid and un-protected leaves of absence, changes from full-time to part-time employment, partial Disability or other changes in the employment status of a Participant, in the discretion of the Administrator.

Section 8. Share Appreciation Rights.

(a) General. Share Appreciation Rights may be granted either alone (“Free Standing Rights”) or in conjunction with all or part of any Option granted under the Plan (“Related Rights”). Related Rights may be granted either at or after the time of the grant of such Option. The Administrator shall determine the Eligible Recipients to whom, and the time or times at which, grants of Share Appreciation Rights shall be made.  Each Participant who is granted a Share Appreciation Right shall enter into an Award Agreement with the Company, containing such terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, which Award Agreement shall set forth, among other things, the number of Shares to be awarded, the Exercise Price per Share, and all other conditions of Share Appreciation Rights. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Related Right may be granted for more Shares than are subject to the Option to which it relates. The provisions of Share Appreciation Rights need not be the same with respect to each Participant. Share Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan shall be subject to the following terms and conditions set forth in this Section 8 and shall contain such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Administrator shall deem desirable, as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

A-9



Table of Contents

(b) Awards; Rights as Stockholder. A Participant shall have no rights to dividends or any other rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Common Stock, if any, subject to a Stock Appreciation Right until the Participant has given written notice of the exercise thereof and has satisfied the requirements of Section 16 hereof.

(c) Exercisability.

(1) Share Appreciation Rights that are Free Standing Rights shall be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Administrator in the applicable Award Agreement.

(2) Share Appreciation Rights that are Related Rights shall be exercisable only at such time or times and to the extent that the Options to which they relate shall be exercisable in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 hereof and this Section 8 of the Plan.

(d) Payment Upon Exercise.

(1) Upon the exercise of a Free Standing Right, the Participant shall be entitled to receive up to, but not more than, that number of Shares equal in value to the excess of the Fair Market Value as of the date of exercise over the Exercise Price per share specified in the Free Standing Right multiplied by the number of Shares in respect of which the Free Standing Right is being exercised.

(2) A Related Right may be exercised by a Participant by surrendering the applicable portion of the related Option. Upon such exercise and surrender, the Participant shall be entitled to receive up to, but not more than, that number of Shares equal in value to the excess of the Fair Market Value as of the date of exercise over the Exercise Price specified in the related Option multiplied by the number of Shares in respect of which the Related Right is being exercised. Options which have been so surrendered, in whole or in part, shall no longer be exercisable to the extent the Related Rights have been so exercised.

(3) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Administrator may determine to settle the exercise of a Share Appreciation Right in cash (or in any combination of Shares and cash).

(e) Termination of Employment or Service.  Unless otherwise provided by the Committee or in the applicable Award Agreement:

(1) In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and all Affiliates thereof (including by reason of the Participant’s employer ceasing to be an Affiliate of the Company) shall terminate for any reason other than Cause, Disability, or death, (A) Share Appreciation Rights granted to such Participant, to the extent that they are exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the date that is ninety (90) days after such termination, on which date they shall expire, and (B) Share Appreciation Rights granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were not exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Share Appreciation Right shall be exercisable after the expiration of its term.

(2) In the event that the employment or service of a Participant with the Company and all Affiliates thereof shall terminate on account of the Disability, or death of the Participant, (A) Share Appreciation Rights granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were exercisable at the time of such termination, shall remain exercisable until the date that is six (6) months after such termination, on which date they shall expire and (B) Share Appreciation Rights granted to such Participant, to the extent that they were not exercisable at the time of such termination, shall expire at the close of business on the date of such termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Share Appreciation Right shall be exercisable after the expiration of its term.

(3) In the event of the termination of a Participant’s employment or service for Cause, all outstanding Share Appreciation Rights granted to such Participant shall expire at the commencement of business on the date of such termination.

(f) Term.

(1) The term of each Free Standing Right shall be fixed by the Administrator, but no Free Standing Right shall be exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date such right is granted.

(2) The term of each Related Right shall be the term of the Option to which it relates, but no Related Right shall be exercisable more than ten (10) years after the date such right is granted.

A-10



Table of Contents

(g) Other Change in Employment Status. Share Appreciation Rights shall be affected, both with regard to vesting schedule and termination, by leaves of absence, including unpaid and un-protected leaves of absence, changes from full-time to part-time employment, partial Disability or other changes in the employment status of a Participant, in the discretion of the Administrator.

Section 9. Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units.

(a) General. Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units may be issued either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan. The Administrator shall determine the Eligible Recipients to whom, and the time or times at which, Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units shall be made.  Each Participant who is granted Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units shall enter into an Award Agreement with the Company, containing such terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, which Award Agreement shall set forth, among other things, the number of Shares to be awarded; the price, if any, to be paid by the Participant for the acquisition of Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units; the period of time restrictions, Performance Goals or other conditions that apply to delivery or vesting of such Awards (the “Restricted Period”); and all other conditions applicable to the Restricted Shares and Restricted Stock Units. If the restrictions, Performance Goals or conditions established by the Administrator are not attained, a Participant shall forfeit his or her Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units, in accordance with the terms of the grant. The provisions of the Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units need not be the same with respect to each Participant.

(b) Awards and Certificates.  Except as otherwise provided below in Section 9(c), (i) each Participant who is granted an Award of Restricted Shares may, in the Company’s sole discretion, be issued a share certificate in respect of such Restricted Shares; and (ii) any such certificate so issued shall be registered in the name of the Participant, and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions and restrictions applicable to any such Award.

The Company may require that the share certificates, if any, evidencing Restricted Shares granted hereunder be held in the custody of the Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed, and that, as a condition of any Award of Restricted Shares, the Participant shall have delivered a share transfer form, endorsed in blank, relating to the Shares covered by such Award.  Certificates for shares of unrestricted Common Stock may, in the Company’s sole discretion, be delivered to the Participant only after the Restricted Period has expired without forfeiture in such Restricted Stock Award.

With respect to Restricted Stock Units to be settled in Shares, at the expiration of the Restricted Period, share certificates in respect of the shares of Common Stock underlying such Restricted Stock Units may, in the Company’s sole discretion, be delivered to the Participant, or his legal representative, in a number equal to the number of shares of Common stock underlying the Restricted Stock Units Award.

Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, any Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units to be settled in Shares (at the expiration of the Restricted Period, and whether before or after any vesting conditions have been satisfied) may, in the Company’s sole discretion, be issued in uncertificated form.

Further, notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, with respect to Restricted Stock Units, at the expiration of the Restricted Period, Shares, or cash, as applicable, shall promptly be issued (either in certificated or uncertificated form) to the Participant, unless otherwise deferred in accordance with procedures established by the Company in accordance with Section 409A of the Code, and such issuance or payment shall in any event be made within such period as is required to avoid the imposition of a tax under Section 409A of the Code.

(c) Restrictions and Conditions. The Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to this Section 9 shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions and any additional restrictions or conditions as determined by the Administrator at the time of grant or, subject to Section 409A of the Code where applicable, thereafter:

(1) The Administrator may, in its sole discretion, provide for the lapse of restrictions in installments and may accelerate or waive such restrictions in whole or in part based on such factors and such circumstances as the Administrator may determine, in its sole discretion, including, but not limited to, the attainment of certain Performance Goals, the Participant’s termination of employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate thereof, or the Participant’s death or Disability, subject to any requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code in the case of any Award which is intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon a Change in Control, the outstanding Awards shall be subject to Section 13 hereof.

(2) Except as provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the Participant shall generally have the rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to Restricted Shares during the Restricted Period; provided, however, that dividends declared during the Restricted Period with respect to an Award that vests or becomes payable based upon the

A-11



Table of Contents

achievement of Performance Goals, shall only become payable if (and to the extent) the performance goals of the underlying Award are achieved. Except as provided in the applicable Award Agreement, the Participant shall generally not have the rights of a stockholder with respect to Shares subject to Restricted Stock Units during the Restricted Period; provided, however, that, subject to Section 409A of the Code, an amount equal to dividends declared during the Restricted Period with respect to the number of Shares covered by Restricted Stock Units or Restricted Shares that vest upon the achievement of Performance Goals shall, unless otherwise set forth in an Award Agreement, be paid to the Participant at the time (and to the extent) Shares in respect of the related Restricted Stock Units are delivered to the Participant or the Restricted Period with respect to the Restricted Shares that vest upon the achievement of Performance Goals expires, provided that the Participant is then providing services to the Company. Certificates for Shares of unrestricted Common Stock may, in the Company’s sole discretion, be delivered to the Participant only after the Restricted Period has expired without forfeiture in respect of such Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units, except as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, shall otherwise determine.

(3) The rights of Participants granted Restricted Shares or Restricted Stock Units upon termination of employment or service as a director, independent contractor or consultant to the Company or to any Affiliate thereof terminates for any reason during the Restricted Period shall be set forth in the Award Agreement.

(d) Form of Settlement.  The Administrator reserves the right in its sole discretion to provide (either at or after the grant thereof) that any Restricted Stock Unit represent the right to receive the amount of cash per unit that is determined by the Administrator in connection with the Award.

Section 10. Other Share-Based Awards.

Other forms of Awards valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, Common Stock, including but not limited to dividend equivalents, may be granted either alone or in addition to other Awards (other than in connection with Options or Share Appreciation Rights) under the Plan. Any dividend or dividend equivalent awarded hereunder shall be subject to the same restrictions, conditions and risks of forfeiture as the underlying Award.  Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Administrator shall have sole and complete authority to determine the individuals to whom and the time or times at which such Other Share-Based Awards shall be granted.  Each Participant who is granted an Other Share-Based Award shall enter into an Award Agreement with the Company, containing such terms and conditions as the Administrator shall determine, in its sole discretion, which Award Agreement shall set forth, among other things, the number of shares of Common Stock to be granted pursuant to such Other Share-Based Awards, or the manner in which such Other Share-Based Awards shall be settled (e.g., in shares of Common Stock, cash or other property), or the conditions to the vesting and/or payment or settlement of such Other Share-Based Awards (which may include, but not be limited to, achievement of performance criteria) and all other terms and conditions of such Other Share-Based Awards.

Section 11. Cash Awards.

The Administrator may grant Awards that are denominated in, or payable to Participants solely in, cash, as deemed by the Administrator to be consistent with the purposes of the Plan, and, such Cash Awards shall be subject to the terms, conditions, restrictions and limitations determined by the Administrator, in its sole discretion, from time to time.  Awards granted pursuant to this Section 11 may be granted with value and payment contingent upon the achievement of Performance Goals.

Section 12. Special Provisions Regarding Certain Awards.

The Administrator may make Awards hereunder to Covered Employees (or to individuals whom the Administrator believes may become Covered Employees) that are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. The exercisability and/or payment of such Awards may, to the extent required to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, be subject to the achievement of performance criteria based upon one or more Performance Goals and to certification of such achievement in writing by the Committee. The Committee may in its discretion reduce the amount of such Awards that would otherwise become exercisable and/or payable upon achievement of such Performance Goals and the certification in writing of such achievement, but may not increase such amounts. Any such Performance Goals shall be established in writing by the Committee not later than the time period prescribed under Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations thereunder. Notwithstanding anything set forth in the Plan to contrary, all provisions of such Awards which are intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code shall be construed in a manner to so comply.

Section 13. Change in Control.

In the event that a Change in Control occurs, then:

A-12



Table of Contents

(a) the restrictions (including exercise restrictions), deferral limitations, payment conditions and forfeiture conditions applicable to an Award granted under the Plan shall lapse and such Awards shall be deemed fully vested;

(b) notwithstanding the foregoing, (i) any Award subject to performance conditions which are tied to a price of a share of Common Stock will only vest to the extent performance conditions are met as of the date of the Change in Control as if the date of the Change in Control was the last date of the performance period; and (ii) any Award subject to performance conditions which are not determined by reference to the price of a share of Common Stock will only vest to the extent performance conditions are on track to be met based on the performance through the date of the Change in Control, as determined in the sole discretion of the Administrator.

The Administrator shall have discretion to provide that all Options and/or Share Appreciation Rights outstanding immediately prior to such Change in Control shall expire on the effective date of such Change in Control.

Section 14. Amendment and Termination.

The Board may amend, alter or terminate the Plan, but no amendment, alteration or termination shall be made that would impair the rights of a Participant under any Award theretofore granted without such Participant’s consent. Unless the Board determines otherwise, the Board shall obtain approval of the Company’s stockholders for any amendment that would require such approval in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code, any rules of the stock exchange on which the Common Stock is traded or other Applicable Law. The Administrator may amend the terms of any Award theretofore granted, prospectively or retroactively, but, subject to SectionInvestor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 of the Plan and the immediately preceding sentence, no such amendment shall materially impair the rights of any Participant without his or her consent.

Section 15. Unfunded Status of Plan.

The Plan is intended to constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive compensation. With respect to any payments not yet made to a Participant by the Company, nothing contained herein shall give any such Participant any rights that are greater than those of a general creditor of the Company.

Section 16. Withholding Taxes.

Each Participant shall, no later than the date as of which the value of an Award first becomes includible in the gross income of such Participant for purposes of applicable taxes, pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Administrator regarding payment of, the minimum amount of any such applicable taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to the Award.  The obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be conditional on the making of such payments or arrangements, and the Company shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to such Participant.  Whenever cash is to be paid pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to deduct therefrom an amount sufficient to satisfy any applicable withholding tax requirements related thereto.  Whenever Shares or property other than cash are to be delivered pursuant to an Award, the Company shall have the right to require the Participant to remit to the Company in cash an amount sufficient to satisfy any related taxes to be withheld and applied to the tax obligations; provided, that, with the approval of the Administrator, a Participant may satisfy the foregoing requirement by either (i) electing to have the Company withhold from delivery of Shares or other property, as applicable, or (ii) by delivering already owned unrestricted shares of Common Stock, in each case, having a value not exceeding the applicable taxes to be withheld and applied to the tax obligations.  Such already owned and unrestricted shares of Common Stock shall be valued at their Fair Market Value on the date on which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined and any fractional share amounts resulting therefrom shall be settled in cash.  Such an election may be made with respect to all or any portion of the Shares to be delivered pursuant to an award.  The Company may also use any other method of obtaining the necessary payment or proceeds, as permitted by law, to satisfy its withholding obligation with respect to any Award.

Section 17. Transfer of Awards.

Until such time as the Awards are fully vested and/or exercisable in accordance with the Plan or an Award Agreement, no purported sale, assignment, mortgage, hypothecation, transfer, charge, pledge, encumbrance, gift, transfer in trust (voting or other) or other disposition of, or creation of a security interest in or lien on, any Award or any agreement or commitment to do any of the foregoing (each, a “Transfer”) by any holder thereof in violation of the provisions of the Plan or an Award Agreement will be valid, except with the prior written consent of the Administrator, which consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of the Administrator. Any purported Transfer of an Award or any economic benefit or interest therein in violation of the Plan or an Award Agreement shall be null and void ab initio and shall not create any obligation or liability of the Company, and any Person purportedly acquiring any Award or any economic benefit or interest therein transferred in violation of the Plan or an Award Agreement shall not be entitled to be recognized as a holder of such Shares or

A-13



Table of Contents

other property underlying such Award. Unless otherwise determined by the Administrator in accordance with the provisions of the immediately preceding sentence, an Option or a Share Appreciation Right may be exercised, during the lifetime of the Participant, only by the Participant or, during any period during which the Participant is under a legal Disability, by the Participant’s guardian or legal representative.

Section 18. Continued Employment.

Neither the adoption of the Plan nor the grant of an Award shall confer upon any Eligible Recipient any right to continued employment or service with the Company or any Affiliate thereof, as the case may be, nor shall it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Affiliate thereof to terminate the employment or service of any of its Eligible Recipients at any time.

Section 19. Effective Date.

The Plan was adopted by the Board on March 24, 2015 and shall become effective upon approval of the Company’s stockholders, the date of such approval is the “Effective Date”.

Section 20. Electronic Signature.

Participant’s electronic signature of an Award Agreement shall have the same validity and effect as a signature affixed by hand.

Section 21. Term of Plan.

No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date, but Awards theretofore granted may extend beyond that date.

Section 22. Securities Matters and Regulations.

(a)Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the obligation of the Company to sell or deliver Shares with respect to any Award granted under the Plan shall be subject to all Applicable Laws, rules and regulations, including all applicable federal and state securities laws, and the obtaining of all such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed necessary or appropriate by the Administrator. The Administrator may require, as a condition of the issuance and delivery of certificates evidencing shares of Common Stock pursuant to the terms hereof, that the recipient of such shares make such agreements and representations, and that such certificates bear such legends, as the Administrator, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or advisable.

(b)Each Award is subject to the requirement that, if at any time the Administrator determines that the listing, registration or qualification of Shares is required by any securities exchange or under any state or federal law, or the consent or approval of any governmental regulatory body is necessary or desirable as a condition of, or in connection with, the grant of an Award or the issuance of Shares, no such Award shall be granted or payment made or Shares issued, in whole or in part, unless listing, registration, qualification, consent or approval has been effected or obtained free of any conditions not acceptable to the Administrator.

(c)In the event that the disposition of Shares acquired pursuant to the Plan is not covered by a then current registration statement under the Securities Act and is not otherwise exempt from such registration, such Shares shall be restricted against transfer to the extent required by the Securities Act or regulations thereunder, and the Administrator may require a Participant receiving Common Stock pursuant to the Plan, as a condition precedent to receipt of such Common Stock, to represent to the Company in writing that the Common Stock acquired by such Participant is acquired for investment only and not with a view to distribution.

Section 23. Section 409A of the Code.

The Plan as well as payments and benefits under the Plan are intended to be exempt from, or to the extent subject thereto, to comply with Section 409A of the Code, and, accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted, the Plan shall be interpreted in accordance therewith. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, to the extent required in order to avoid accelerated taxation and/or tax penalties under Section 409A of the Code, the Participant shall not be considered to have terminated employment or service with the Company and its Affiliates for purposes of the Plan and no payment shall be due to the Participant under the Plan or any Award until the Participant would be considered to have incurred a “separation from service” from the Company and its Affiliates within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code. Any payments described

A-14



Table of Contents

in the Plan that are due within the “short term deferral period” as defined in Section 409A of the Code shall not be treated as deferred compensation unless Applicable Law requires otherwise. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, to the extent that any Awards (or any other amounts payable under any plan, program or arrangement of the Company or any of its Affiliates) are payable upon a separation from service and such payment would result in the imposition of any individual tax and penalty interest charges imposed under Section 409A of the Code, the settlement and payment of such awards (or other amounts) shall instead be made on the first business day after the date that is six (6) months following such separation from service (or death, if earlier). Each amount to be paid or benefit to be provided under this Plan shall be construed as a separate identified payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code.  The Company makes no representation that any or all of the payments or benefits described in this Plan will be exempt from or comply with Section 409A of the Code and makes no undertaking to preclude Section 409A of the Code from applying to any such payment. The Participant shall be solely responsible for the payment of any taxes and penalties incurred under Section 409A. For purposes of a deferral of compensation under the Plan, in applying Treasury Regulation §1.414(c)-2 for purposes of determining trades or businesses (whether or not incorporated) that are under common control for purposes of section 414(c) of the Code, the language“atleast20percent”shallbeusedinsteadof “atleast80percent”ateachplaceitappearsinTreasuryRegulation§1.414(c)-2.

Section 24. Notification of Election Under Section 83(b) of the Code.

If any Participant shall, in connection with the acquisition of shares of Common Stock under the Plan, make the election permitted under Section 83(b) of the Code, such Participant shall notify the Company of such election within ten (10) days after filing notice of the election with the Internal Revenue Service.

Section 25. No Fractional Shares.

No fractional shares of Common Stock shall be issued or delivered pursuant to the Plan. The Administrator shall determine whether cash, other Awards, or other property shall be issued or paid in lieu of such fractional shares or whether such fractional shares or any rights thereto shall be forfeited or otherwise eliminated.

Section 26. Beneficiary.

A Participant may file with the Administrator a written designation of a beneficiary on such form as may be prescribed by the Administrator and may, from time to time, amend or revoke such designation. If no designated beneficiary survives the Participant, the executor or administrator of the Participant’s estate shall be deemed to be the Participant’s beneficiary.

Section 27. Paperless Administration.

In the event that the Company establishes, for itself or using the services of a third party, an automated system for the documentation, granting or exercise of Awards, such as a system using an internet website or interactive voice response, then the paperless documentation, granting or exercise of Awards by a Participant may be permitted through the use of such an automated system.

Section 28. Severability.

If any provision of the Plan is held to be invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions of the Plan shall not be affected but shall be applied as if the invalid or unenforceable provision had not been included in the Plan.

Section 29. Clawback.

Notwithstanding any other provisions in this Plan, any Award which is subject to recovery under any law, government regulation or stock exchange listing requirement, will be subject to such deductions and clawback as may be required to be made pursuant to such law, government regulation or stock exchange listing requirement (or any policy adopted by the Company pursuant to any such law, government regulation or stock exchange listing requirement).

Section 30. Governing Law.

The Plan shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of law of such state.

A-15



Table of Contents

1234 ANYWHERE STREET SHARES CUSIP # JOB #SEQUENCE # VOTE BY THE INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up untilinformation. Vote by 11:59 p.m.  Eastern Time the day before the meeting date.P.M. ET on 06/05/2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m.  Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. on 06/05/2018. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE John Sample 234567VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 1234567 1234567NY 11717.

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following:

1. Election of Directors

01

Robert H. Fish

o For All

o Withhold All

o For All Except

02

George V. Hager, Jr.

03

Arnold Whitman

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) here:                                 

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals NAME THE COMPANY NAME INC. - COMMON THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS A THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS B THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS C THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS D THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS E THE COMPANY NAME INC. - CLASS F THE COMPA N Y NAME INC. - 401 K CONTROL #  SHARES123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 123,456,789,012.12345 x PAGE1 OF 2 3 and 4:

2. Advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

o For

o Against

o Abstain

3. To approve the Genesis Healthcare, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.

o For

o Against

o Abstain

4. To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015.

o For

o Against

o Abstain

NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED OR, IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN, WILL BE VOTED AS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS AS SET FORTH ABOVE.

Please check this box if you plan to attend the meeting in person:

Yes o

No o

Address Change? Mark box, sign, and indicate changes below:

o

Date:

Signature(s) in Box

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.



Table of Contents

GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. 101 E. STATE STREET KENNETT SQUARE, PA 19348 Investor Address Line 1 Investor Address Line 2 Investor Address Line 3 Investor Address Line 4 Investor Address Line 5 8 8 8 1 1234 ANYWHERE STREET ANY CITY, ON A1A 1A1 234567 234567 234567 234567

GRAPHIC

 


ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

June 3, 2015

9:00 a.m.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice &and Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders (10-K Wrap)Form 10-K Wrap are available at www.proxyvote.com.

Genesis Healthcare, Inc.

101 East State Street

Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348

proxy

www.proxyvote.com GENESIS HEALTHCARE, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders June 6, 2018 8:30 AM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors.

Directors The stockholder(s)shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Thomas DiVittorio and Michael S. Sherman, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of Genesis Healthcare, Inc. that the stockholder(s)shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m.8:30 AM, local time on June 3, 2015, at the company’s office located6, 2018, at 101 EastE. State Street, Kennett Square, PennsylvaniaPA, 19348, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.

This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’Directors' recommendations.

Address change/comments: (If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on the reverse side 0000371494_2 R1.0.1.17

GRAPHIC